-
Comment -
that is what happens when I start tailing someone, lose tiebreaks. Dodig dominated the whole match except for the tiebreak.Comment -
I know, it is just so sick what happens right now, I had three buzzer-beaters going against me in CBB and I sent 3 three teams with points into OT and lost. And I am winning 20% of my tiebreaks this year in tennis, which is still profitable, but could be so much more with 50% won.Comment -
hey matt,
an idea came to my mind earlier on how to play your picks.
as an example: you are saying Guillmero Garcia Lopez will not win in 3 sets.
I figured to take his Team Total (Player Total) Under 12.5, since there seems to be a huge chance he wins in 2 sets giving you a good chance to cash or he loses in 2 sets which would let your bet win anyway. ALso there is a small chance to cash when it does go 3 sets and he loses. What do you think?
GL rest of the wayComment -
Hey, it seems when I post these plays that for the most part, the favs follow the trend. They won't win in 3 sets. Berrer won in 3 sets today, but I mean it's not 100% everytime. It's hit about 90% of the time so far. I would recommend maybe playing the dog here @ + money. They seem to win the 3rd set more than the favorite does. The other hard part is if it doesn't go to 3 sets the Fav usually wipes the floor with there opponent.
I will ill come up with some percentages in the next few days on what side to play. It's hard to do write ups and entertain the GF at the same time lolComment -
ATP Play #48 Memphis
Not Pryziensny in 3 sets. Russle hasn't been playing that well. Prsienzy has just bumped into stiff opponent but he's been playing well.
2-0 @2.20 is worth a shot hereComment -
przys wins 9 of the first 12 games...then implodes, winning just 1 of the following 13 games...beyond maddening...they should check for a cabbage-like growth on the back of his neck
Comment -
Not sure how you guys can tail plays when the guys math or methods don't make any sense. GL tho, I chuckled at the I said don't take someone in 3 sets so that means to take the under, not even taking into account that 2 set matches can go over depending on the line. Whacko stuff going on in here.
Best way to welcome myself to the party, what up?????Comment -
R u serious man? Right off the bat I'm telling you who won't win in 3 sets. Yes my analysis was off on a few plays but take a look throughout the entire thread... Maybe 5 plays out of 20+ havnt hit. Take the dog when's its close to a 50/50 match, when the fav isn't supposed to win in 3 sets.$$$
if you were reading above, these plays are just suggestions. My real plays are in my other thread.Comment -
I've read through. I actually think you know what you're talking about just fine but the way you're presenting these suggestions and their success is simply flawed. The guy above was pointing it out pretty clearly but gave up because I'm assuming he didn't feel like beating his head against a wall a bunch of times.
If these are mere suggestions why are you posting a 29-13 ytd record which isn't sustainable with the system or whatever it is you're employing/suggesting? Just a mere observation not trying to ruffle any feathers.Comment -
cultural reference to one of the great sci-fi/horror classic movies of all time..."Invasion of the Body Snatchers"...super easy to watch online for free (i'd recommend u try "project free tv"...but I'd be surprised if there isn't a super convenient youtubing of it available as well)...watch the 1956 original first...then the 1978 remake...they're both great...
BTW, your avatar (of Toronto thug-mayor) makes a good icon for one of "them"Comment -
What your saying is pretty much what I'm implying. The guy above didnt understand me. I keep a record because I wanted to see how correct the trend was. when I say someone dosnt win in 3 sets it usually hits. My book has a line where I merely just fade it. It works well too. I'll be a little more clear in the future. Sorry I figured by giving who wasn't gonna win in 3 sets would help people out in here. Did u notice how I went huge on Venus Williams 2-0 sets.... One of the few ones that hit this morning... With ease. That was part of the trend. That was a 10 unit play.... First one I've done in a few weeks.Comment -
Let's stop this discussion and get back to talking about making money. All of is wanna do that lolComment -
How you feel about bouchard in straights?Comment -
Or about ATP or WTP picks? My books don't have challenger matchesComment -
Play # 49
Not Kanepi in 3 sets. I seem to jinx this shit everytime when I say 2-0 sets so I'm just going to leave it at this. She has the game to win in straightsComment -
Play # 50
Pliskova 2-0 sets 1.57Comment -
Play # 51
Cibulkova 2-0 sets 1.67 *** Hammer timeComment -
Play # 52
*Bouchard 2-0 sets 2.10Comment -
Play # 53
Not svitolina in 3 sets. If you thinks this goes 3 sets, take Zakapolova MLComment -
Play # 54
Petkovic 2-0 sets 1.67Comment -
Play # 55
Not gulbis in 3 sets.Comment -
Play # 56
Chardy 2-0 sets 1.67Comment -
Play # 57
Parlay based on trends... Kanepi/cibulkova/Bouchard/Chardy @ 3.10
Comment
