Sets wagering. Something I've been noticing with some books

[therealdealau]

Cheering for Gasquet in 2 matt, lets get it.

[matt1216]

Play #38

Bencic 2-0 3.00

Winner

[matt1216]

sorry guys. This is why I hate Monfilis. The guy lost a set to vegetablelized Nemo! Of course he takes 2 sets from Gasguet, no problem. I'll just avoid any Monfilis shit shows. What a joke

[fitguy67]

in reality, there are two Gael Monfils...one is accurately ranked as #5 in the world...the other is accurately ranked as #155...

we just never know which one will show up

[matt1216]

Play # 42

Fognini 2-0 1.80 x 2 units Fognini 2-1 3.75 x 1 unit

[matt1216]

Play # 42

Fognini 2-0 1.80 x 2 units Fognini 2-1 3.75 x 1 unit

Win

[gooze]

What's the win of that? $6 on a $30 bet?

[SirtySree]

0.6 units won from 3 units making the bet only @1.2 odds.

I hate to keep pointing this out but just don't want to see u lose money. I know u said u thought this out but this method isnt going to win u anything. Stick to just betting 1 play for each match like 2-0 set and u will profit much more.

[matt1216]

0.6 units won from 3 units making the bet only @1.2 odds.

I hate to keep pointing this out but just don't want to see u lose money. I know u said u thought this out but this method isnt going to win u anything. Stick to just betting 1 play for each match like 2-0 set and u will profit much more.

Actually its 1.4... Wich was better than the 1.29 ML ... Trust me dude. This has been working

[matt1216]

0.6 units won from 3 units making the bet only @1.2 odds.

I hate to keep pointing this out but just don't want to see u lose money. I know u said u thought this out but this method isnt going to win u anything. Stick to just betting 1 play for each match like 2-0 set and u will profit much more.

Once again u failed to understand the thread. Most people would have taken under 21.5@ 1.83. I told u I was eliminating possibilities

[matt1216]

What's the win of that? $6 on a $30 bet?

200$ to win 180$ for 2-0 sets

100$ to win 275$ for 2-1 sets

bet A) wins 180$ -bet B) 100$


total money won 80$.... 200$ to win 80$ in the end is 1.40... You guys need to learn math

[matt1216]

0.6 units won from 3 units making the bet only @1.2 odds.

I hate to keep pointing this out but just don't want to see u lose money. I know u said u thought this out but this method isnt going to win u anything. Stick to just betting 1 play for each match like 2-0 set and u will profit much more.

i will tally up the money I've made so far on this thread a bit later tonight. I literally spent may 45mins combined on all these plays.. We will see what my hourly wage is

[SirtySree]

You are still not understanding me =.="

It is not 200 to win 80 as stated by u above, it is 300 to win 80. U cnt just take the winning pot only, u have to take the whole lot as the whole lot has the potential chance to lose. Thats y i keep telling u wen u bet 2-0 both ways @3 each, it isnt a @2 bet, it is only @1.5 which books also offer as they understand the concept.

As for the 2nd post above, how do u play the over/under games wen u got 2-0 and 2-1?

Not trying to be a dick or anything bout just trying to let u know ur concept is slightly off and this is not profitable i nthe long run. Your 2-0 bets for only 1 side r doing well tho and that is the rite concept which u should b sticking to

[gooze]

200$ to win 180$ for 2-0 sets

100$ to win 275$ for 2-1 sets

bet A) wins 180$ -bet B) 100$


total money won 80$.... 200$ to win 80$ in the end is 1.40... You guys need to learn math

$200 * 1.80 = $360 = $160 profit!!!

Who will learn math??

[SirtySree]

i will tally up the money I've made so far on this thread a bit later tonight. I literally spent may 45mins combined on all these plays.. We will see what my hourly wage is

Dont count ur 2-0 set bets that u put on one side only as that concept is correct. Do a tally for only the other bets. I did a rough one for the past 10 games and the loss is massive.

[matt1216]

Dont count ur 2-0 set bets that u put on one side only as that concept is correct. Do a tally for only the other bets. I did a rough one for the past 10 games and the loss is massive.

What?? Dude what r u talking about?

[matt1216]

29-13 ytd

[matt1216]

$200 * 1.80 = $360 = $160 profit!!!

Who will learn math??

Lol, woops.... Yes I take that back. Minor error. Still a profit 60$

[SirtySree]

Ugh nevermind. I tried to help but its fine.

[matt1216]

Dont count ur 2-0 set bets that u put on one side only as that concept is correct. Do a tally for only the other bets. I did a rough one for the past 10 games and the loss is massive.

Dude, your killing me. When I say not Vasseline in 3 sets for example, I'm telling you to take the under... Holly crist man.

[gooze]

Lol, woops.... Yes I take that back. Minor error. Still a profit 60$

Yes it's easy to miscalculate when you do it fast;-). Maybe you have something intresting there so keep it up!

[SirtySree]

Dude, your killing me. When I say not Vasseline in 3 sets for example, I'm telling you to take the under... Holly crist man.

Why cant you say that then? Cause not Vasselin in 3 could still mean the other guy can win in 3 also so its not under. Plus my main concern was the ones where u say 2-0 player 1/2-1 player 2 making the under/over games not a play.


Regardless, good luck. I cant help anymore then I have. I have given u numerous examples bt doesnt look like its helping.

[matt1216]

Ugh nevermind. I tried to help but its fine.

Dude, have u seen my other there lately??? Take a look. I post these plays here as possibilities of what will happen. I understand your logic. Take a look and compare both threads for a second. I have Bencic in here 2-0 @ 3.00 odds. My other thread has her 1.87ml x 5 units..... This thread is JUST a suggestion because my book is giving away essentially wich side will win... The 2-0 sets that I've gotten wrong I've pretty much guessed on... This morning my book gave away that gasquet would not win in 3 sets... I keep eliminating sets. Trust me you will see.

the guys that follow saw that I took 600$ up to 46K last September. Trust me I will be ok

[matt1216]

Why cant you say that then? Cause not Vasselin in 3 could still mean the other guy can win in 3 also so its not under. Plus my main concern was the ones where u say 2-0 player 1/2-1 player 2 making the under/over games not a play.


Regardless, good luck. I cant help anymore then I have. I have given u numerous examples bt doesnt look like its helping.

I understand what your saying.... Watch the next few plays, I won't guess either.. Then watch my other thread for my official play on this pick.... I respect your opinion you are right. I will mention if I feel it's the over or under from now on

[gooze]

Looks intresting this thing you have going! I will keep looking for sure.

[matt1216]

Looks intresting this thing you have going! I will keep looking for sure.

Thanks for pointing out my mistake(math) lol


I will explain the plays as I post from now on

[gooze]

Thanks for pointing out my mistake(math) lol


I will explain the plays as I post from now on

Your welcome, hehe I will stay tuned

[matt1216]

Play #42 Rotterdamn

Not Dodig in 3 sets. I think Dodig wins in 2 sets here. My book Is giving Mattieu PH @ 6.00 for 2-0 or 2-1. I think this is a red flag as my book dosnt seem to care what part of PH you take. Dodig serves well on indoor hardcourt

[matt1216]

Play #43

Not Berrer in 3 sets. I will look into this more

[matt1216]

Play # 44

Not Garcia Lopez in 3 sets. I will look into this more

[matt1216]

Play # 45 Federation Cup

Suarrez Navarro 2-0 sets 1.80/ under if you have it

[matt1216]

Play # 46

Barthel 2-0 sets 2.00

[matt1216]

Play # 47

Venus Williams 2-0 sets 1.71/under if you have it

[Vinnie Paz]

Thanks man

[matt1216]

no prob, let's hope these hit