Originally Posted by
noyb
i couldn't disagree more with your entire post.
first of all, you have no proof whatsover the OP is lying. you might strongly believe this is the case, but you have no proof (and even if the OP is not a woman, but an old fat guy who hoped he would get more sympathy from us this way, where's the relevance with regards to the case before us???)
who really is the shot taker here? the book knew (or should have known) from the beginning the person that signed up here appeared to be from CR -> they did nothing, since they expected the bettor to lose, like they almost always do. that's their right, but imo they also at that time give up their right doing something about it at a later time when it better suits them.
unfortunately, the bettor turned out to be a winner, and then (and only then) did the book cry foul.
these kinds of practices are no better than any bettor taking a shot, it's very difficult to see how anyone would side with the book in these kind of matters.