[Vetal888]

Hello! Be very careful with VictorChandler!!! They very artfully and dishonestly arrive.
If you win against them, they it to you will close your account, but their this right - they don't want to play with strong players.
But that as they arrive with the accepted rates after in the world in all offices the quotation has strongly fallen to game, they to you can change it to that which it will be favourable. They to me so have made. They speak "at us there was an essential error". It is lie! Any an error at them wasn't.
I put in victorchandler on game Holland - San Marino for 5 days prior to the beginning of a match. Throughout 5 days the quotation on my rate has fallen in all offices, and they took and have changed my quotation on that which was already in all offices directly ahead of the game. The quotation has strongly changed because many players put the given rate. The quotation changed gradually throughout 5 days.
I long corresponded with them, but they don't want to give money which I has fairly earned. They speak that "there was an essential error", I give all of them screenshots about that that I am right that quotation falling was gradual, but representatives victorchandler as robots tell one and too "an essential error". On my question in details to understand they don't want because they aren't right.

[Vetal888]

There are no forces with victorchandler more to communicate, I have sent the complaint on help@sportsbookreview.com with all proofs - screenshots :
Description: Hello! Help to restore justice please. Bukmekerkaja office VC has dishonestly calculated to me the rate. Long correspondences with them give nothing. They as robots answer same and don't want to understand the conflict. I have put the rate on August, 29th on a match Holland - the Dignity - Marino of more than 5,5 goals for $500 *2.3. On August, 30th I couldn't come to myself into the account on VC site and I have contacted a support service.
To me have informed that VC don't want to play more with me, and the rate to Holland more than 5,5 is last rate which you at me accept and August, 30th "12:09:10AM: Nina - Contact Centre: this will be honored and any winnings will be returned to you"
After a while on August, 30th to me on an electronic box have sent the letter
"The balance of this Account now stands at zero with one outstanding bet that will be honoured.
24620614400
USD 500.00 Single: OVER 5.5 @ 2 .300 [Over/Under 5.5 - 90 Mins] - Netherlands v San Marino Euro - 2012
As explained in our Terms and Conditions, a Traders decision is final and will not be over turned.
We would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your custom."
The match has taken place on September, 2nd (I staked for 5 days prior to the beginning of a match). The account of a match 11-0. After a match I have found out in myself on a box the letter from VC date on September, 2nd. They before the match beginning have written to me that they have changed the quotation with 2,3 on 1,571 - they have sounded the reason of the decision that it they have made a typing error. I confirm that it is a lie! Any typing error wasn't. Initially all offices which left some days before a match gave high quotations on more 5,5, namely Bwin gave on more than 5,5 quotation 2,1, VC gave on more than 5,5 quotation 2,3, Titanbet gave on more than 5,5 quotation 1,95. (Analysts of offices have initially given such quotations because from last 18 matches Holland on more 5,5 has played only 1 matches, also Holland already played this year from San Marino, in a match 5 balls have been hammered.) But I as well as considered many players that Holland after defeat malicious and should win at 8-10 balls. Therefore I put on more 5,5. Gradually quotations on more 5,5 decreased. VC initially gave on more than 5,5 quotation 2,3 / on less than 5,5 quotation 1,6. In two days VC gave on more than 5,5 quotation 2 / on less than 5,5 quotation 1,73. I in office Bwin have added on October, 31st the rate more than 5,5 for 1,91.
Even on September, 1st quotations on a match on more than 5,5 I put in the express train in Jetbull for 1,7.
And only on September, 2nd in day of a match the maximum quotation on more 5,5 in a match was 1,62
That VC tells that that instead of 2,3 on more than 5,5 they should give 1,571 is a lies. At them the line was more than 5,5 for 2,3/less than 5,5 for 1,6 then they have changed a line more than 5,5 for 2,1/less than 5,5 for 1,73. Quotations 1,571 at them never was on the given match neither on more nor on less.
In the given match of the quotation on more 5,5 changed gradually initially there were big quotations on more 5,5 in all who gave some days before a match and only in day of a match of the quotation have fallen to the minimum. Falling of quotations was gradual.
VC concludes a bet, and then before a match looks as in the world quotations on the given event and if they have strongly fallen that they have changed speak to the player that they had a typing error. It after all dishonest game.
Pinnaclesports always arrives fairly and never even if in the world the quotation they always will very strongly fall to event pay under that quotation on which have accepted.
I have all screenshots which confirm my correctness. I send them to you on
help@sportsbookreview.com

[lukahh]

good luck.
if price was fair, you should have the case.

i have good experience with VC. Except for that they booted me after playing there for 3 years.

[Vetal888]

victorchandler has solved: what for to pay 500*2,3 if it is possible to pay 500*1,571, and that that the rate has been made 5 days prior to game and the quotation in all offices fell gradually?
Whence they took factor 1,571??? After all on more than 5,5 they gave 2,3, and on less 1,6, then in two days on more 2, on less 1,73..... Why 1,571? I ask them, where you such figure took?... On what they answer me that we regret, you are upset that won't play any more.... I won't be on the contrary glad what to play with such dishonest office. I am upset because of dishonesty. So the bet can't be concluded, have concluded at one price, and then have changed for that price which it was generated in 5 days.
Holland from the last 18 matches only 1 has played on more 5,5 therefore their analysts and have given a line and have thought that in a match will be less than 5,5.
Authoritative office Pinnaclesports has given the given match only in day of game though other matches has given 10 days prior to game. The given game was difficult for analytics, on the one hand Holland as a rule hammers in 3-4 balls and calms down and from the last 18 matches 1 only on more 5,5 (From San Marino they also played and have won 5-0), and on the other hand Holland after defeat should be rehabilitated and with what account will want with such and will win against San Marino.
And analysts victorchandler and some other offices have thought that they the cleverest and distances the given match for 5 days prior to the beginning.
But all have calculated and Viktorchandler has decided to use cunning and save money.

[bigboydan]

VictorChandler (SBR Rated B) is usually pretty fair with things from what most players have told me. Not always but in most cases.

[Vetal888]

VictorChandler (SBR Rated B) is usually pretty fair with things from what most players have told me. Not always but in most cases.

I too VC considered as good office, even when they have told that don't want to play with me and the rate Holland - San Marino more than 5,5 for 2,3 is last rate which they at me accept. Even after that I considered as their reliable office, their this right not to play with strong players. I when play poker and I see that players have gathered strong behind a table and they beat me I rise because of this table, it is heavy to me to play against players which more strongly me.
But when they they after in the world within 5 days the line on more 5,5 has strongly fallen and they have changed conditions of my bet with them in 5 days is already a deceit! After that I don't consider VC as good office.
Though probably top management VC doesn't know about the given situation. At VC in my opinion weak analysts and is possible not to remain the unemployed, these analysts and have thought up in that case as with me a variant of change of the quotation on more favourable to them, and to an average link of managers with which I corresponded analysts speak that they in dispute with the client insisted that there was a typing error. If fairly to consider the given situation that any person can see that the typing error wasn't, and there was a gradual decrease in the quotation in all offices

[Vetal888]

I have made the complaint in SBR and the help has been rendered me. Initially victorchandler carefully didn't investigate the arisen problem. But after intervention SBR with me has communicated Charlie McCann (Director of online Public Relations VictorChandler.com) and has promised carefully to investigate my complaint.
And at last it was made, to me have fairly calculated the rate under which quotation I put for 5 days prior to the beginning of a match.
Many thanks SBR for that that they help to restore justice!

[laconic]

Well done to all.

[bigboydan]

I have made the complaint in SBR and the help has been rendered me. Initially victorchandler carefully didn't investigate the arisen problem. But after intervention SBR with me has communicated Charlie McCann (Director of online Public Relations VictorChandler.com) and has promised carefully to investigate my complaint.
And at last it was made, to me have fairly calculated the rate under which quotation I put for 5 days prior to the beginning of a match.
Many thanks SBR for that that they help to restore justice!

I'm glad to hear this matter was resolved to your satisfaction sir.