Too old, too white and too male

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dante1
    BARRELED IN @ SBR!
    • 10-31-05
    • 38647

    #1
    Too old, too white and too male
    these words being spoken by many R politicians and strategists today, but not the nit wits on this forum, they think everything is okay.




    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83472.html
  • milwaukee mike
    BARRELED IN @ SBR!
    • 08-22-07
    • 26914

    #2
    ron paul is whiter, older, and more of a man

    and MUCH more deserving to be president than romney or obama

    if ron paul got 1/5th the tv time that romney and obama got he would've won in a landslide
    Comment
    • CarpeDime
      SBR Hall of Famer
      • 09-01-09
      • 7873

      #3
      America is done

      the day of the white establishment is over

      hope your happy

      4 years ago we got us a BROTHER in the White House, could not fukin believe it. AND THEN HOMEBOY WON AGAIN!!! I mean what country IS THIS??? Do these people voting know what a fukin American looks like?? IT LOOKS LIKE OPIE AND BIGDAY!!!

      We should send some SBR guys out, go door to door to all registered Democrat households, with a glossy pic of Opie, and just knock on the doors, and say "hey a*shole, sorry to interrupt your day, I just wanted to show you a picture of what a FUKIN REAL AMERICAN LOOKS LIKE OK??? This guy. His name is opie1988 he posts at SBR Forum. Thanks for your time, and please consider rooting FOR America at some point in the future"
      Comment
      • dante1
        BARRELED IN @ SBR!
        • 10-31-05
        • 38647

        #4
        MM really, even though he is a crazy person. I don't think so, he couldn't get 10% of the R probably wouldn't even get 5% of the D's
        Comment
        • Darkside Magick
          SBR Posting Legend
          • 05-28-10
          • 12638

          #5
          there is only 2 people on the elephant side that can win in 2016...marco rubio and condy rice. if they trot anybody else out they get stomp again
          Comment
          • dante1
            BARRELED IN @ SBR!
            • 10-31-05
            • 38647

            #6
            Originally posted by CarpeDime
            America is done

            the day of the white establishment is over

            hope your happy

            4 years ago we got us a BROTHER in the White House, could not fukin believe it. AND THEN HOMEBOY WON AGAIN!!! I mean what country IS THIS??? Do these people voting know what a fukin American looks like?? IT LOOKS LIKE OPIE AND BIGDAY!!!

            We should send some SBR guys out, go door to door to all registered Democrat households, with a glossy pic of Opie, and just knock on the doors, and say "hey a*shole, sorry to interrupt your day, I just wanted to show you a picture of what a FUKIN REAL AMERICAN LOOKS LIKE OK??? This guy. His name is opie1988 he posts at SBR Forum. Thanks for your time, and please consider rooting FOR America at some point in the future"


            another crazy person, they never seem to stop.
            Comment
            • dante1
              BARRELED IN @ SBR!
              • 10-31-05
              • 38647

              #7
              “Our party needs to realize that it’s too old and too white and too male and it needs to figure out how to catch up with the demographics of the country before it’s too late,” said Al Cardenas, the head of the American Conservative Union and a longtime GOP leader. “Our party needs a lot of work to do if we expect to be competitive in the near future.”

              Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories...#ixzz2Bg7Hz3Ly
              Comment
              • TheRifleman
                SBR Hall of Famer
                • 08-30-12
                • 7284

                #8
                The media, particularly the liberal and “left” supporters of the Democratic Party, were quick to hail the re-election of Obama as a major triumph. The International Socialist Organization, for example, began its editorial, “Barack Obama has won re-election, thanks to a strong turnout by the Democratic Party’s core supporters in every place the president needed to win.”
                In fact, Obama saw a substantial drop in his vote across the board, with millions more Americans choosing not to vote in this election. Little remains of the enthusiasm of 2008, when Obama was swept into power on a wave of popular hostility to the Bush administration.
                Obama’s total vote count was approximately 9 million less than what he received in 2008, falling from 69.5 million to 60.5 million, or by about 13 percent. For his part, Romney pulled in only 57.5 million votes, about 2.5 million less than John McCain in 2008. That is, Obama just barely received more votes than his Republican challenger four years ago.



                Comment
                • TheRifleman
                  SBR Hall of Famer
                  • 08-30-12
                  • 7284

                  #9
                  I don't even understand what that means, too white, too old, too male? The Republican party stands for traditional American values. What exactly does the D party stand for? I still haven't figured it out. Does anyone know? Seriously?
                  Comment
                  • TheRifleman
                    SBR Hall of Famer
                    • 08-30-12
                    • 7284

                    #10
                    The sharp fall in Obama’s vote as he won his second term is virtually unprecedented in the history of American politics. It is in fact exceedingly rare for a president to win a second term with less votes than in the first election. George W. Bush, for example, increased his vote from 50 million in 2000 to 62 million in 2004. Clinton increased his vote from 45 million in 1992 to 47.5 million in 1996. Reagan increased his vote from 44 million in 1980 to 54.5 million in 1984.
                    Indeed, the last time that a president won reelection with a decline in his popular vote came in the elections of 1944 and 1940, as Franklin Delano Roosevelt saw his enormous advantage over his Republican challengers fall somewhat in his bids for third and fourth terms after his landslide election in 1932.
                    However, a comparison to Roosevelt’s votes is itself instructive in understanding the scale and significance of Obama’s decline. In 1936, Roosevelt was elected to a second term in the midst of the Great Depression, seven years after the Wall Street crash of 1929. In that election, FDR increased his popular vote from 23 million to 28 million, a growth of more than 20 percent. His Republican challenger, Alf Landon, won only 36.5 percent of the popular vote, carrying just two states, Vermont and Maine, for a total of eight electoral votes. In the next two elections, Roosevelt’s total vote fell to 27.3 million and then 25.6 million.
                    As with FDR, Obama was elected under conditions of deep economic and social crisis, taking over from the most hated president in US history, George Bush. However, in four years he managed to almost entirely dissipate whatever advantage he had over his Republican challengers.



                    Comment
                    • DwightShrute
                      SBR Aristocracy
                      • 01-17-09
                      • 103512

                      #11
                      Dante, you throw out that word "crazy" almost as often as "the" or "and"

                      The guys you call crazy love American as much as you. I would argue more actually, but that can't be proven. What can be proven is they understand that free shit isn't free. Someone has to pay for it.

                      Loyalty to the country always. Loyalty to the government when it deserves it - Mark Twain
                      Comment
                      • dante1
                        BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                        • 10-31-05
                        • 38647

                        #12
                        Originally posted by DwightShrute
                        Dante, you throw out that word "crazy" almost as often as "the" or "and"

                        The guys you call crazy love American as much as you. I would argue more actually, but that can't be proven. What can be proven is they understand that free shit isn't free. Someone has to pay for it.

                        Loyalty to the country always. Loyalty to the government when it deserves it - Mark Twain


                        Dwight, did I ever call you crazy. I only call people crazy that are. You know even if you don't admit it that chuck connors is crazy. He wants to kill 1 billion people. I and you probably know that many on the tea party side are also crazy. When you make comments that are crazy I call you a crazy. It is a common name for the very very right wing R. Ever hear me call IP crazy no. Car man is a crazy person it fits. Only the crazies do I call crazy and if you search your soul you will say I am correct.

                        Loving your country is great, but if you love your country and say that 1 billion catholics should be killed you are crazy. Are you not?

                        Hitler and Stalin only killed in the millions and they were crazy, chuck wants to kill a billion what should I call him maybe a humanitarian or a Christian? I think crazy is correct.
                        Comment
                        • Carseller4
                          SBR Posting Legend
                          • 10-22-09
                          • 19627

                          #13
                          Originally posted by dante1
                          “Our party needs to realize that it’s too old and too white and too male and it needs to figure out how to catch up with the demographics of the country before it’s too late,” said Al Cardenas, the head of the American Conservative Union and a longtime GOP leader. “Our party needs a lot of work to do if we expect to be competitive in the near future.”

                          Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories...#ixzz2Bg7Hz3Ly
                          Al Cardenas...Fukk you. When you need cash for your "Conservative" Union, who are you going to call on? That's right...OLD, WHITE, MALES...and I hope they tell you to shove it up your ass.

                          Conservatism works, and it works for everyone regardless of color, sex, or age.

                          This is the problem the Republican establishment and their namby pamby, John Boehner crybaby, just get along with the enemy mentality. They blame conservatives, they blame the TEA Party, but expect their full support for their RINO sissy ass candidates.

                          FUKK "EM
                          Comment
                          • d2bets
                            BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                            • 08-10-05
                            • 39995

                            #14
                            Originally posted by TheRifleman
                            The media, particularly the liberal and “left” supporters of the Democratic Party, were quick to hail the re-election of Obama as a major triumph. The International Socialist Organization, for example, began its editorial, “Barack Obama has won re-election, thanks to a strong turnout by the Democratic Party’s core supporters in every place the president needed to win.”
                            In fact, Obama saw a substantial drop in his vote across the board, with millions more Americans choosing not to vote in this election. Little remains of the enthusiasm of 2008, when Obama was swept into power on a wave of popular hostility to the Bush administration.
                            Obama’s total vote count was approximately 9 million less than what he received in 2008, falling from 69.5 million to 60.5 million, or by about 13 percent. For his part, Romney pulled in only 57.5 million votes, about 2.5 million less than John McCain in 2008. That is, Obama just barely received more votes than his Republican challenger four years ago.


                            Don't you think you should wait until all the votes are counting before declaring how many votes the candidates received? As of now, Obama is up to 60,913,288. However, the results are not all in, not even close. CA is at 70% in; OR 75%; WA 55%; NY 86% and so on.

                            I know how you guys hate numbers and such.
                            Comment
                            • KingJD31
                              SBR Hall of Famer
                              • 11-04-11
                              • 8167

                              #15
                              Lmao 86% Obama in NY, no
                              Originally posted by d2bets
                              Don't you think you should wait until all the votes are counting before declaring how many votes the candidates received? As of now, Obama is up to 60,913,288. However, the results are not all in, not even close. CA is at 70% in; OR 75%; WA 55%; NY 86% and so on.

                              I know how you guys hate numbers and such.
                              Comment
                              • dante1
                                BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                                • 10-31-05
                                • 38647

                                #16
                                Originally posted by KingJD31
                                Lmao 86% Obama in NY, no
                                I think you are misinterpreting these numbers, not surprised though
                                Comment
                                • dante1
                                  BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                                  • 10-31-05
                                  • 38647

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by Carseller4
                                  Al Cardenas...Fukk you. When you need cash for your "Conservative" Union, who are you going to call on? That's right...OLD, WHITE, MALES...and I hope they tell you to shove it up your ass.

                                  Conservatism works, and it works for everyone regardless of color, sex, or age.

                                  This is the problem the Republican establishment and their namby pamby, John Boehner crybaby, just get along with the enemy mentality. They blame conservatives, they blame the TEA Party, but expect their full support for their RINO sissy ass candidates.

                                  FUKK "EM

                                  "the enemy" this is why you are a crazy. Do you see Dwight he is a crazy.
                                  Comment
                                  • KingJD31
                                    SBR Hall of Famer
                                    • 11-04-11
                                    • 8167

                                    #18
                                    Lincoln would be a liberal right? You can just picture him demandin under parentsg health insurance cover kids until 26 and free.birth control
                                    Originally posted by dante1
                                    I think you are misinterpreting these numbers, not surprised though
                                    Comment
                                    • dante1
                                      BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                                      • 10-31-05
                                      • 38647

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by KingJD31
                                      Lincoln would be a liberal right? You can just picture him demanding health insurance cover kids until 26 and free.birth control

                                      I am talking sir about the numbers in the chart.

                                      And yes of course Lincoln was a liberal for the times, actually he was a radical liberal.

                                      But get back to the chart and find your mistake. Read it again please
                                      Comment
                                      • KingJD31
                                        SBR Hall of Famer
                                        • 11-04-11
                                        • 8167

                                        #20
                                        I know he said 86% of votes have been counted, I know inferno
                                        Comment
                                        • dante1
                                          BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                                          • 10-31-05
                                          • 38647

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by KingJD31
                                          I know he said 86% of votes have been counted, I know inferno


                                          ok, but you didn't know that when you responded, you thought something different. don't get pissy with the inferno stuff.
                                          Comment
                                          • TheRifleman
                                            SBR Hall of Famer
                                            • 08-30-12
                                            • 7284

                                            #22
                                            IDIOT brain-washed liberals have NO basis for their claims that "Lincoln would have been a liberal" LMFAO! and they think that his anti-slavery stance, which was what the Republican Party was founded and still operates on, was "liberal Democratic." Not only is this demonstrably false (because given Abraham Lincoln's political positions and actions, he would be more disgusted with liberal/progressive Democrats than he was with southern Democrats), it's outrageous and, to an extent, very dangerous.

                                            Abraham Lincoln was not and would not be by any means a "liberal Democrat." One can make a case with classical liberalism, but modern liberalism is a definite "no." Why do liberals and progressives use Abraham Lincoln as ammunition to attack conservatives and to feed their "the parties switched sides in the 60's" falsehood? Don't they know that he was faithful to Republicanism and would never be a Democrat?

                                            If you think that the parties switched sides, I have a pack of wet matches I'd like to sell you. Oh, and here's a quote by Lincoln to you idiot liberals:

                                            “You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich.
                                            You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.
                                            You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift.
                                            You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down.
                                            You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred.
                                            You cannot build character and courage by taking away people's initiative and independence.
                                            You cannot help people permanently by doing for them, what they could and should do for themselves.”
                                            Comment
                                            • milwaukee mike
                                              BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                                              • 08-22-07
                                              • 26914

                                              #23
                                              so 95% of the people are anti-war yet we have forever wars.
                                              95% of the people are anti-deficits, for legalizing gambling and marijuana, etc yet we get none of those things.

                                              and anyone suggesting that the people actually get what they want is labeled crazy or a conspiracy nut.

                                              the ONLY candidate i would consider in 2016 is jesse ventura, and even he won't go far enough and say the obvious fact that israel controls the u.s.
                                              Comment
                                              • rkelly110
                                                BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                                                • 10-05-09
                                                • 39691

                                                #24
                                                Originally posted by CarpeDime
                                                America is done

                                                the day of the white establishment is over

                                                hope your happy

                                                4 years ago we got us a BROTHER in the White House, could not fukin believe it. AND THEN HOMEBOY WON AGAIN!!! I mean what country IS THIS??? Do these people voting know what a fukin American looks like?? IT LOOKS LIKE OPIE AND BIGDAY!!!

                                                We should send some SBR guys out, go door to door to all registered Democrat households, with a glossy pic of Opie, and just knock on the doors, and say "hey a*shole, sorry to interrupt your day, I just wanted to show you a picture of what a FUKIN REAL AMERICAN LOOKS LIKE OK??? This guy. His name is opie1988 he posts at SBR Forum. Thanks for your time, and please consider rooting FOR America at some point in the future"
                                                Pete, I'd love for you to make a video of what you posted. I'd be great watching you go off.
                                                Comment
                                                • dww123
                                                  SBR Sharp
                                                  • 07-06-11
                                                  • 441

                                                  #25
                                                  I think people are finally realizing white males are HORRIBLE at running things whether it be a household, small business, corporation or an entire country. I mean sure you've got Abraham Lincoln, Augustus Ceasar, Winston Churchill, Charlemagne, Alexander the Great, Julius Caesar, Thomas Jefferson, Steve Jobs, Warren Buffett, Ronald Reagan, Lee Iacocca, Walt Disney, Andrew Carnegie, J.D Rockafeller etc.. But all in all white males are a bit of a joke that have done little to advance human civilization.
                                                  Comment
                                                  Search
                                                  Collapse
                                                  SBR Contests
                                                  Collapse
                                                  Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                                                  Collapse
                                                  Working...