The GOP’s Supercommittee Backlash

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jw
    SBR MVP
    • 10-25-09
    • 3999

    #1
    The GOP’s Supercommittee Backlash


    Congressmen coming back from Thanksgiving break are hoping that a seasonal spirit of forgiveness—or the lingering effects of a food coma—will erase the supercommittee’s stain of failure.

    It won’t. There will be an enduring political price to pay for last week’s pathetic face-plant. And while confidence in the entire institution’s capacity to reason together will continue to decline, polls show that congressional Republicans are taking the brunt of the blame, specifically among swing voters.

    Here’s why: all the 2010 talk about dealing with the generational theft of deficits and debt ended up taking a back seat to antitax theology when it mattered most.

    To add insult to the injury of this lost opportunity, there was actually broad agreement among the American public about a balanced plan that could have reduced the long-term deficit and debt while sacrificing Republican and Democrat sacred cows. People understand this was a failure of political will produced by the disproportionate influence of special interests.

    Dig beneath the surface of Gallup’s new poll showing that 55 percent of Americans blame both parties for the failure of the supercommittee, and you’ll see the remaining breakdown leans decidedly against the GOP: 24 percent say Republicans were to blame, while 15 percent point the finger at Democrats. Among independent voters the split is even starker: 21 percent say the GOP was to blame, while just 9 percent say Democrats were the primary problem.

    This corresponds with a CNN poll taken the week before the supercommittee decided to wave the white flag. It showed that 40 percent of independent voters would blame Republicans more for a supercommittee failure, while 24 percent would blame the Democrats. Likewise, 47 percent of self-identified centrists said they would blame the GOP, while 25 percent said the Dems would be most at fault.

    The key dynamic to watch is the nearly 2-to-1 split when independents and centrists are asked which party is to blame for supercommittee failure. It’s not news to note that partisans are polarized along party lines when assigning blame—the real news is the verdict from these swing voters that Republicans are the primary culprit.

    It’s consistent with the dynamics driving congressional approval rates to historic lows. Remember that independent voters swung the 2010 elections to the GOP by a 17-point margin. But a recent CNN poll showed only 15 percent of independents approve of Republican leadership in Congress, compared with 21 percent of Democrats—still a pathetic poll number but notably less bad from voters who reject both parties by definition.

    Likewise, only 14 percent of moderate voters approve of Republican leadership in Congress—surprisingly, that’s same percentage of liberals who approve of the GOP leadership—while 31 percent approve of Democrats in Congress. Again, there’s that 2-to-1 margin despite the fact that everyone is underwater in Washington.

    Of course, the real question is why such a split exists on the supercommittee. One answer can be found in the support that existed for the broad outlines of a bipartisan compromise.

    Keep in mind that two thirds of Americans rarely agree on anything—but CNN polling earlier this month found that 67 percent of Americans supported raising taxes on higher-income Americans and businesses as part of a supercommittee plan to deal with the deficit and debt. Likewise, 66 percent supported major spending cuts to domestic government programs.

    In contrast, only 12 percent of Americans supported raising taxes on middle-class or lower-income Americans as part of a deficit deal. And just 40 percent supported major cuts to the military, like the kind that now loom due to the sequestration scheduled to take effect because of the supercommittee’s failure.

    Interestingly, while only 41 percent supported making major changes to Social Security and Medicare—a phrasing that plays into "Medi-scare" fears far beyond the modest formula adjustments that could create real long-term savings—that number was up from 35 percent in August.

    In other words, there was ample public support for a grand bargain in addition to the congressional Gang of 150. A not-incidental 54 percent of independents say that they wanted to see more compromise from the supercommittee in pursuit of a deal. The supercommittee failed because of a lack of political will—particularly on the part of Republicans who refused to consider any revenue increases unless they were accompanied by major reductions in the top tax rate or a permanent extension of all the Bush tax cuts.
  • rkelly110
    BARRELED IN @ SBR!
    • 10-05-09
    • 39410

    #2
    People wonder why the prez uses executive orders.

    It's a little hard to take the Repubs seriously, when a RICH guy tells or pays them to
    sign a pledge to not raise taxes on the rich. I'll bet if the Dems agreed to raising taxes
    on the middle class, the Repubs would be running to sign.

    Toomey is in my state. He won't get my vote.
    Comment
    • itchypickle
      SBR Posting Legend
      • 11-05-09
      • 21452

      #3
      Did anyone really think they were going to come to an agreement?

      These were the same people appointed, who were having the same argument for over a year before.....just giving them a deadline will not change their opinions. The triggers were set up to ONLY take effect after the 2012 election for crying out loud...so this sham was just a way to end the debt ceiling debate in the summer and have this one come to pass....now it will be hashed out as a new crisis in Jan once the holidays are over.

      You can present one new 'blue ribbon committee' per month from now until Nov 2012....if one half wants more taxes to promote their agenda for reelection and the other half wants no more taxes to promote their reason for votes.....guess what....50/50 equals no decision.
      Comment
      • DwightShrute
        SBR Aristocracy
        • 01-17-09
        • 101235

        #4
        another example of the lack of leadership from Obama. He hires a economic committee to make suggestions, they do but he dismisses them. Then he appoints a "super committee" to do his job. Obama is clueless, smug and arrogant. The complete opposite of what a leader should be.

        Maybe if Obama spend less time campaigning for re-election, he would have time to do his job. Maybe his special interest groups and unions don't agree he should.
        Comment
        Search
        Collapse
        SBR Contests
        Collapse
        Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
        Collapse
        Working...