Anyone else thinking of playing exclusively at Rebatewager in 2010?

MonkeyF0cker · 12-31-09, 01:31 PM

Originally posted by Nicky Santoro

poker,

don't believe him buddy, he's full of shit.. most of his bets have not been beaten the closers.. i am following this to a tee. he's counting betting -5 -110 as beating the closer because he has it at -5 even..LOL. that's not beating the closer at all, but he seems to want to think so...

what a moron..

Wrong on all counts. Weird.

Nicky Santoro · 12-31-09, 01:33 PM

Originally posted by MonkeyF0cker

Wrong on all counts. Weird.

Right on all counts.. NOT weird.

MonkeyF0cker · 12-31-09, 01:36 PM

Originally posted by BLACKIE

I'm glad you guys are all having fun here. Maybe when it's over we will laugh about it over a couple of beers.

I have one question for you. Are you playing of the lines posted on SBR odds or playing of the lines on our site?

I'm copying/pasting off of your site. This is incredibly fun. I really appreciate this.

MonkeyF0cker · 12-31-09, 01:39 PM

Originally posted by Nicky Santoro

Right on all counts.. NOT weird.

List every wager and the Pinny closer off of SBR Odds then. Prove it.

Nicky Santoro · 12-31-09, 01:42 PM

Originally posted by MonkeyF0cker

List every wager and the Pinny closer off of SBR Odds then. Prove it.

you think i am going to spend 2 hrs going through all your 31 plays today. it's freakin dec 31st and tons of games going off.

not all went against you, but i'd say easily more than half remained same or went against you. remaining the same is not +ev..

tullamore · 12-31-09, 01:43 PM

Originally posted by Nicky Santoro

poker,

don't believe him buddy, he's full of shit.. most of his bets have not been beaten the closers.. i am following this to a tee. he's counting betting -5 -110 as beating the closer because he has it at -5 even..LOL. that's not beating the closer at all, but he seems to want to think so...

what a moron..

nicky, I know you like to sh1t on Monkey. But instead of just staying he is wrong, why not prove he is wrong. Can you do that?

MonkeyF0cker · 12-31-09, 01:44 PM

Originally posted by pokernut9999

Nicky I will you give you credit , you are the only guy on this site that proved he can hit at a high percentage

Nicky , I played with so called poker pros for 3 years in Biloxi and they all had the same thing in common.

They all lost in the long run and one of the guys even had books published on how to win at poker. No lie the guy never had ONE winning session in the 3 years I played with him.

LOL. Nicky was betting against stale morning lines. I'm betting into Pinny clones. I wouldn't expect you to understand the difference though.

GamblingStacy · 12-31-09, 01:44 PM

I really love the idea of getting rebates from gambling losses!

MonkeyF0cker · 12-31-09, 01:46 PM

Originally posted by Nicky Santoro

you think i am going to spend 2 hrs going through all your 31 plays today. it's freakin dec 31st and tons of games going off.

not all went against you, but i'd say easily more than half remained same or went against you. remaining the same is not +ev..

Are you saying that you HAVEN'T done this? How do you know that I haven't beaten most closers then? LOL. Do you EVER not talk out of your fukkin fat ass?

Nicky Santoro · 12-31-09, 01:49 PM

did you forget i am grading this.. i look at each bet and the # you got it at and 64% of them you had zero edge.. zero.. as in ZERO.. as in 0.

and a few were -ev.. and even you know this..

tullamore · 12-31-09, 01:49 PM

Originally posted by Nicky Santoro

you think i am going to spend 2 hrs going through all your 31 plays today. it's freakin dec 31st and tons of games going off.

not all went against you, but i'd say easily more than half remained same or went against you. remaining the same is not +ev..

Why would you have to look anything up. You already said he didn't beat the closing #.

How do you know this without previously looking up the closing numbers.

Nicky Santoro · 12-31-09, 01:50 PM

read post # 535..

Thank You,

Nicky

MonkeyF0cker · 12-31-09, 01:51 PM

Dec 31 235 STANFORD
2:00PM 236 OKLAHOMA u54½-110

MonkeyF0cker · 12-31-09, 01:52 PM

You have the chance to prove it. Otherwise, kindly shut the fuk up.

tullamore · 12-31-09, 01:53 PM

Originally posted by Nicky Santoro

read post # 535..

Thank You,

Nicky

read post #530.

Thank You

Tully

MonkeyF0cker · 12-31-09, 01:54 PM

Dec 31 235 STANFORD
2:00PM 236 OKLAHOMA -10-110

MonkeyF0cker · 12-31-09, 01:55 PM

And yes, I know the market doesn't suggest value on Oklahoma -10, but there is some.

Nicky Santoro · 12-31-09, 01:55 PM

when i grade each game, i peak at pinny closer and i always laugh how he NEVER hardly beats the closer. it's alwys same as pinny, or half pt worse. this happens on 70% of his games, i swear..

lets keep track the next few days and lets see.. ok??

Thank You,

Nicky

pokernut9999 · 12-31-09, 01:56 PM

Originally posted by MonkeyF0cker

LOL. Nicky was betting against stale morning lines. I'm betting into Pinny clones. I wouldn't expect you to understand the difference though.

All I know is you have yet to hit 50% , but time will tell.

MonkeyF0cker · 12-31-09, 01:57 PM

My objective is to find inefficient game markets now. I'm not going to care about the closer on many of my picks from here forward.

BubbleBobble · 12-31-09, 01:59 PM

Originally posted by MonkeyF0cker

My objective is to find inefficient game markets now. I'm not going to care about the closer on many of my picks from here forward.

So you are flipping a coin - good choice, as betting into Pinny clones is exactly that. Meaningless contest from the beginning.

MonkeyF0cker · 12-31-09, 02:01 PM

No. Not every closer is efficient on Pinny.

MonkeyF0cker · 12-31-09, 02:05 PM

Dec 31 573 ORAL ROBERTS
8:00PM 574 SOUTH DAKOTA ST +2-110

Nicky Santoro · 12-31-09, 02:05 PM

Originally posted by BubbleBobble

So you are flipping a coin - good choice, as betting into Pinny clones is exactly that. Meaningless contest from the beginning.

bubble,

i am starting to feel bad for the kid. i swear he has no idea what the fuk he's doing. .man, i knew he was a square, but i had no idea he was this much of a square.. lol
poor kid, i am starting to really feel bad for him.

this contest brought out his true colors. i was right all these years about him..

MonkeyF0cker · 12-31-09, 02:06 PM

Dec 31 565 NC STATE
6:00PM 566 NC GREENSBORO +10-110

BubbleBobble · 12-31-09, 02:07 PM

Originally posted by MonkeyF0cker

No. Not every closer is efficient on Pinny.

Yea

But instead of wasting your time with those clowns, you could make some money.

I prefer things like this, instead of smashing my brain and figuring out if Okla -10 -110 has value...

NCAA, Football Stanford 31-December-2009 11:00 AM PST Spread +10 for Game +115 Risking 1,960.00 to Win 2,254.00 EUR

Dec 31 2:06pm Football - Pending 2200.00 to win 2000.00 1. Football - Oklahoma - spread -10 (-110)
for the entire game held on Dec 31 at 2:00pm [pending]

And yea i know it's nothing special, but i can get drunk from the result.

MonkeyF0cker · 12-31-09, 02:13 PM

True, Bubble, but I want to finally prove these idiots wrong. I'm tired of them. My real wagers come before this contest.

MonkeyF0cker · 12-31-09, 02:17 PM

Dec 31 533 UL LAFAYETTE +9½-110
6:00PM 534 WESTERN KENTUCKY

onthewhat · 12-31-09, 02:20 PM

Originally posted by MonkeyF0cker

My real wagers come before this contest.

Already working on his excuse if he doesn't hit 50%

MonkeyF0cker · 12-31-09, 02:29 PM

If I wanted an excuse, I'd say that if every wager had a 4% edge I'm 85.630941% to hit over 50%. Thank God I didn't though.

smitch124 · 12-31-09, 02:30 PM

Originally posted by Nicky Santoro

one day i'll teach you how.. you're still an unexperienced gambler.. you have a lot to learn. it's so easy. i bet i can beat RW's closing line 95 out of 100 times.. there's a way to do it..

Originally posted by Nicky Santoro

are you nuts or are you just crazy?? 190 out of 200 to beat the #?? not even Billy Walters can pull that off consistently. lol.. durito, do you think i was born yesterday to take that bet.. and the funniest thing was not that, it was giving me only +150.lol..

Chi_archie · 12-31-09, 02:32 PM

good catch smitch

MonkeyF0cker · 12-31-09, 02:32 PM

Nicky just loves to make a fool of himself, smitch. Nothing new.

Nicky Santoro · 12-31-09, 02:41 PM

it wasn't a catch at all.. i stick by it. it would be impossible to do it here because i would have to put in my bet asap, then come in here and post it, and by the time i do that, line changes.. there's not enough time to do this.. and it would probably hurt my betting if i had to rush it.. not worth it at all. i have nothing to prove to you guys anything. i know what i am capable of and that's it.

with the amount of volume that i give each week, i'd be broke 24 yrs ago if i was betting into real #'s..

mcbaseball10 · 12-31-09, 02:43 PM

Originally posted by pokernut9999

There is no confusion at all , he stated his plays were not profitable. I guess you are going to tell us you bet the 14 winners and passed on the 16 losers. Call it what you want, if you bet the same plays you get the same results .

I have bet one of his plays so far. But I will continue to see what plays he is making and see if there is an advantage to the game. That's how I follow somebody elses' plays. Take the free info and use it if it makes sense. Don't use it if it does not.