The 36 year old fraud QB without a playoff win isn't getting one this week. Everyone hanging off Arizona's sack like they've won something.. they haven't accomplished anything and Palmer is a loser same with that arrogant prick Arians. Everyone left Green Bay for dead, but this is a battle tested team who has been in this situation before. Arizona tipped their hand a few weeks ago and McCarthy and Co. will adjust and you can bank on that. Palmer made it through the season without getting injured that is his big accomplishment time to pack it in.
-
Comment -
Good points I must admit.. Still this is the playoffs now and not a regular season game in week 4 against the Rams.. Cards have been one of the hottest teams down the stretch... Same can't be said for the Packers.. Packers did show up and beat the Skins or it's more like the Skins beat themselves.. That was some horrible football the skins played...Originally posted by habitualwinning
Cards will be ready and rested..
Comment -
Green Bay reminds me a little of the Giant teams from a few years ago. Disrespected and written off.Comment -
Boys your going to get Aaron Rodgers best performance on Sunday.Comment -
Will that be the season ending press conference? Game is Saturday night.Originally posted by PorkChopComment -
Originally posted by meader99
Got my tickets todayComment -
I can see Arizona winning, but -7.5?
The first game was still just 17-0 at half and then Starks 10 yard run turned into a fumble and game was over ... usually doesn't happen like that again.
The question is, does Adams absence actually help Green Bay? Aaron can say what he wants but DaVonte was pretty much a liability all year.Comment -
Originally posted by StackinGreen
DaVante's loss is actually very large. Not a killer, but will hurt some. (And yes, he was dreadful during regular season). Was sensational in Washington. This will result with using Cobb more in the backfield, and inside slot, line Abbrederis outside to stretch field. He'll be the keyComment -
The key is always protection. They won't be able to protect Rodgers this week. You guys think Rodgers had some kind of reincarnation last week, fact is he still missed guys that were wide open on throws he would normally make. Something ain't right with him.Originally posted by PorkChopComment -
Reminds me of the cardinals team that went into new Orleans a few years ago as 7 point dogs and got blown out of the building.Originally posted by JassieJamesComment -
The line has settled in at Arizona -7. Don't expect much movement either way, if any. The fact that I brought up last week still holds true for this week. Green Bay is a much better away team than a home team. Counting last week's playoff game, the Pack is now 4-1 S/U in their past 5 away games. They have scored 30, 27, 30, 8, and 35 points in those 5 games. Arizona has just 3 losses, but two of them came at home. I have my 7 middle so I will just sit back and enjoy this game.Comment -
I think it'll be a pretty close game hard to blow out teams in the playoffs nowComment -
Finally, JJ, a good insight.Originally posted by jjgoldComment -
You might be right (I do agree this'll be a close one) but the teams they played at home were 3 divisional opponents and Dallas, who had a good D. The points came against Oakland, Washington, Detroit (27, 20 before hail mary), but at Vikings and at Carolina goes to your point (latter with really late late points)Originally posted by BigdaddyQHComment -
Honey Badger didn't play in that game against the Packers. He tore his ACL the week before.Originally posted by YoungGamblerPeople forget Honey Badger got injured that game. They will not play their left guard in left tackle this game.
In Packers I trust Spread + ML
Comment -
Ariz is fav to win it all...Comment -
Rodgers will have no time they lose 28 to 7Comment -
-
What's up with that ? I can see Sea/Car/NE/Den/GB/KC all having a legit chance of beating them. How are they the favs to win it all, with an unproven and old, injury-prone QB ?Originally posted by nyplayer33Comment -
arizona 5.5 to 1 bet365Comment -
To be fair, NE/Den/Car/Sea are all given almost the same odds.Comment -
Originally posted by nyplayer33
If the Packers lose by 21, I'll pay JJ's rent for a monthComment -
Just to clear, how much is that?Originally posted by PorkChopComment -
Can anyone explain why if KC is +220-250 this game, and I presume they'll be a +4 or a bit higher against Denver if they win, so around +210 again ... why the AFC championship odds are like 4-1?
Who actually bets these futures?
Doing the math for those that can't, fair price for KC to win the AFC should be no less than +900, and that's using the math on bad moneylines to begin withComment -
Spread would be only +3 at Denver if KC beats New England. So than you have +220/250 @ New England, combined with +155/175 @ Denver. Combine those and there you have the +440 to win AFC right now. (+1050 to win SuperBowl). Odds are correct.Originally posted by StackinGreenComment -
What?!?!?!Originally posted by PorkChop
+220 and +155 = +716 oddsComment -
Yup, I'm very disappointed in PorkChop's math ability. SBR has an easy parlay calculator to use:Originally posted by moses millsap
Comment -
Originally posted by slacker00
LOL. I know that boys, but that's not how the Future Odds are calculatedComment -
Yes, and that's bare bones minimum with bad ML to start, as I said. For anyone who wants to know how it is calculated (I could show you favorite lines later), it is a one-up of the money line (+220 is 3.2, +155 is 2.55) and a multiplier, 3.2 x 2.55 = 8.16, but that includes the wager, so you subtract one every time for 7.16 = +716Originally posted by moses millsap
Originally posted by PorkChop
No offense, but you don't know math and then you tell us that's not how they are calculated? Ummm, I'm pretty sure I know exactly how they are calculated, which is my first gripe, PorkChop. The answer is that they know bare bones it should be +716, and they even have an edge with that, but they deliberately put horrible numbers out to gouge you, not because it has anything to do with "calculations"Comment -
At the very worst your argument would have to be it's a separate pool ... but even so I think they are charging exotic racing wager type vigs in that pool (25+%), which proves my point yet again. Horrible bet nowhere near reality.Comment -
Wisconsin native here: zona covers. Davante loss is BIG. He was just getting confidence and turning it on.Comment -
Barclay who is essentially an average guard and sometimes backup for Bulaga at RT played LT against Arizona, he got exposed real bad at LT. Bulaga the RT was also injured in the Arizona game, 3rd quarter I think and didn't return. They're going to have their entire offensive line that started this season healthy for this game FWIW. Adams is out though, expect to see them moving Cobb around a lot like they did in Washington; whether it works against Zona is another story. I have my doubts, this Zona team is so loaded; think they're going all the way unless Palmer just caves under the pressure.Originally posted by meader99Comment -
I know Barclay is the back up, but he did start every game at RT all year last season when Bulaga was hurt. Frankly I think Bakhtiari stinks, he's a walking penalty. Not sure why they scrapped the plan of moving Bulaga to LT to play alongside Sitton making the left side a strength. Perhaps 69 is better at RT, but even if he isn't, Barclay is more suited to play RT. Barclay is a much better run blocker than pass blocker however. I do agree with you that Arizona will go to the bowl, and then win it.Originally posted by StevedoreComment -
I know Rodgers says he steps it up in the playoffs, but the guy has clearly been a huge disappointment this year, almost a liability at WR. I'm not so sure it isn't a good thing.Originally posted by WiscoBets
All in all, it's too many points, I'm leaning Arizona for the win but will say GB will absolutely compete and cover that line.Comment -
WowComment
