Canbet, Centrebet, Ladbrokes, Stan James vs Pinny, CRIS, DSI, Greek etc - RANT

[noyb]

Canbet/IASBet simply copy the odds of SBOBET and add some juice. So actually they have _never_ better odds than SBOBET and therefore at the moment I don't use them.

in general you're absolutely right about the copying of odds with added juice (they used to copy them without any added juice before the summer, but apparently they weren't making enough money on that). you should change never to almost never though. there are situations when they do have the best price on soccer, better than sbo, if you hadn't noticed when or where i'm not gonna tell you, because these situations can be quite profitable if you're the first to spot it

[donjuan]

You are worthy of them, your input was certain to cause friction, and you still choose to fan the flames.

THAT is pathetic.

Or I was actually being quite helpful in a post not directed to you in any way. Again, pathetic.

[englishmike]

Come on chaps, no need to fall out, it's a good debate, doesn't have to come to abuse.

DonJuan: All I was reffering to was my rationale behind playing a +400 that I viewed as +300 chance. If I can get +400 about teams I view +300 chances for the rest ofmy life I'll continue to do so but I certainly didn't give that rationale to be told I'm either stupid, wrong or both....not that I'm saying you said that, but the way I bet works for me, if yours works for you, great, I like to see people win but winning doesn't depend on listening to your advice or views first....with respect.

Santos + APK: Regarding UK football ONLY, having done some research, In fairness to both of you, you are correct to a certain extent and strictly speaking, more correct than me and I'm more than happy to recognise that.

However, having spoken to an independent bookmaker (who im willing to give you the number of if you PM me) he told me that at least one game on his football coupon changes every two weeks on average, some weeks none at all. The fact he changes any makes me wrong for saying NONE are changed so apologies for that and I'm happy to stand corrected, however I'm sure you'll agree that one game every two weeks is hardly significant.

With regards online prices, yes they do change at certain books but some books will hold their lines all week, so again, I'm happy to stand corrected for claiming NONE move, that was inncorrect and innaccurate and I accept that. However, on any normal week he did tell me that very very few online lower league lines move, nor do Scottish, however he did say non-league lines move because it takes a lot less money to do so.

In summary, I was wrong to claim there were no 'across the board' line changes, however i do still stand by my comments regarding soccer lines moving less than any other sport known to gambling.

Hope this clears it up a bit, thanks for your input, depite the falings out I'm always happy to set the record straight if I'm wrong.

[acw]

I love this discussion between sh*t books and even sh*tter books. I am afraid (as they are much smarter) that for those that really want to go for the big money, there is no other market than the Asian one.

[kiwi]

...there are situations when they do have the best price on soccer, better than sbo, if you hadn't noticed when or where i'm not gonna tell you, because these situations can be quite profitable if you're the first to spot it

... there are situations when Oddset does have the best price on soccer, better than sbo, if you hadn't noticed when or where i'm not gonna tell you, because these situations can be quite profitable if you're the first to spot it

[donjuan]

Kiwi,

What is the NZ TAB like with regards to limits?

[HeeeHAWWWW]

I love this discussion between sh*t books and even sh*tter books. I am afraid (as they are much smarter) that for those that really want to go for the big money, there is no other market than the Asian one.

This leads to the fundamental rule of online betting:

All books are sh*t, except Pinnacle.