Are you being a faux sharp if you take the Chiefs tonight?

[No coincidences]

He is not saying that, he is saying that SBR as a collective assumes the dog is "sharp". He is asking if there is a reason besides the collective thought of "oh, KC will be sharp so I am betting them"

Thank you.

Obviously reading comprehension isn't really strong in this thread.

[No coincidences]

this.

Bottom-line is the right side/sharp side is the side that wins. Every-time.....drips like No coin will try to tell you different.

Actually, that's all I've ever said here over and over again. But keep spinning and weaving your lies -- that's what you do best.

[convick]

NC is trying to be counter-counter-Sharp which is

Like Sammy said , DO NOT OVER-THINK this gm or any gm

So youre saying Pitt ML is the way to go.

Personally I like the Under.

[Sam Odom]

So youre saying Pitt ML is the way to go.

Sammy has NOT decided - havent thought much about it

[tto827]

Actually, that's all I've ever said here over and over again. But keep spinning and weaving your lies -- that's what you do best.

NOOO!! Winning side is not always sharp.
Up to 98 points any takers, I'll take KC +2000 since they are going to lose this is a "square" side

[Sam Odom]

Johnny Walker is winning

[ngates815]

I never said the "sharp" side was the VT ML.

I'm saying the Florida State ML was a damn stupid bet to make.

Right, VT was the Losing side of the wager. Sammy Bet the winning side, I have no idea how some people can argue that a wager that makes one person money was a stupid bet.


Now Would I bet -550 to win a 100 bucks? No, but do I think a person doing that is stupid? nahh
Sammy probably bet 600 to win 100 on New England as well. Good bet by him.

I could of been a sharp if either of my VT or Buffalo bets would of won, I would of been the talk of the town with how sharp I am winning those huge underdogs...But instead I lost 200 bucks while the other fukkin guy is counting his cash. Yet he's an idiot and a square for betting those.

Makes zero sense to me, but then again, I'd rather make money than be called a sharp and lose. Everyone is different I guess.

[tto827]

Right, VT was the Losing side of the wager. Sammy Bet the winning side, I have no idea how some people can argue that a wager that makes one person money was a stupid bet.


Now Would I bet -550 to win a 100 bucks? No, but do I think a person doing that is stupid?
Sammy probably bet 600 to win 100 on New England as well. Good bet by him.

I could of been a sharp if either of my VT or Buffalo bets would of won, I would of been the talk of the town with how sharp I am winning those huge underdogs...But instead I lost 200 bucks while the other fukkin guy is counting his cash. Yet he's an idiot and a square for betting those.

Makes zero sense to me, but then again, I'd rather make money than be called a sharp and lose. Everyone is different I guess.

SO my buddy got Florida St ML at -950, was he "sharp"?

[PAULYPOKER]

Rushing Passing Turnovers Penalties Date Teams Score Line Result Half FD TOP ATT-YDS CMP-ATT YDS FL INT PEN-YDS 11/27/2011 PITTSBURGH 13 -11 SU Under 13 18 33:30 28-108 21-31 182 1 1 6-50 KANSAS CITY 9 41.5 ATS 6 15 26:30 34-90 18-28 162 1 3 4-20

[ngates815]

SO my buddy got Florida St ML at -950, was he "sharp"?

Where did I say he's a sharp? I said there are winning bets and losing bets...The guys that use the terms Squares/Sharps every single day are just losers trying to justify why there bet won/lost by using those terms.

You're buddy who got FL ST ML at -950 is considered a dumbfuk not a "sharp".

No biggie...

I don't think you need to give me any more lessons, my brain is hurting trying to take in all that knowledge you already projected on me earlier with your made up coinflip game and it's great odds....

[k13]

Alright Ngates and Sam, so if you found KC +10,000 somewhere, that would be a square side if they end up losing? And Pitt -10,500 would be sharp?

Kind of like Romney +10000?

[No coincidences]

http://forum.sbrforum.com/nba-basketball-betting/1753700-why-were-heat-square-tonight.html

No square/sharp -- just a winner and a loser.

http://forum.sbrforum.com/players-talk/1391601-if-theres-one-thing-ive-learned-betting-sports-p2.html

There are winners and losers. That's it.

[No coincidences]

Where did I say he's a sharp? I said there are winning bets and losing bets...The guys that use the terms Squares/Sharps every single day are just losers trying to justify why there bet won/lost by using those terms.

So like I said, getting back to the faux sharp question....

[yahoonino]

13.5 lot of potato,,,stay away,,,

[tto827]

Where did I say he's a sharp? I said there are winning bets and losing bets...The guys that use the terms Squares/Sharps every single day are just losers trying to justify why there bet won/lost by using those terms.

You're buddy who got FL ST ML at -950 is considered a dumbfuk not a "sharp".

No biggie...

I don't think you need to give me any more lessons, my brain is hurting trying to take in all that knowledge you already projected on me earlier with your made up coinflip game and it's great odds....

Okay then, I just wanted everyone to acknowledge that not every winning bet is "sharp". I don't like the term either, "sharps" make money because their bet has value, and that will end in profit over the long run. Basing a bettors ability based on a small sample size is pointless.

[PAULYPOKER]

Play ONPITTSBURGH using the money line in All games in all games where the total is between 35.5 and 42 points
The record is 19 Wins and 4 Losses for the last three seasons (+15.15 units)

Play UNDERKANSAS CITY on the first half total in All games after 2 or more consecutive losses
The record is 0 Overs and 9 Unders for the last two seasons (+9.00 units)

Line: PITTSBURGH -12.5 StatFox PowerLine: PITTSBURGH -18
Edge On: PITTSBURGH (5.5)

[No coincidences]

Play ONPITTSBURGH using the money line in All games in all games where the total is between 35.5 and 42 points
The record is 19 Wins and 4 Losses for the last three seasons (+15.15 units)

Play UNDERKANSAS CITY on the first half total in All games after 2 or more consecutive losses
The record is 0 Overs and 9 Unders for the last two seasons (+9.00 units)

Line: PITTSBURGH -12.5 StatFox PowerLine: PITTSBURGH -18
Edge On: PITTSBURGH (5.5)

What do previous seasons have to do with this matchup tonight?

[k13]

Pitt won't lose since they are home but even the Raiders beat them.

Better off taking something like Charles under 70 yards rushing.

[DudleyDawson]

I'm saying, is there a reason behind backing the Chiefs tonight -- or is it just hoping they'll cover because they're a dog and the assumption is the dogs are always a "sharp" play in the NFL?

Thanks for the expert analysis instead of contributing to the thread. Now go back to betting SBR points. Maybe Sammy can throw you a few for kissing his Cracker Jack Box ring.

Always the same bullshit with this, No Coin kid.....every time he gets buried, which is often....the other guy is only betting points.....

[PAULYPOKER]

Pitt won't lose since they are home but even the Raiders beat them.

Better off taking something like Charles under 70 yards rushing.

Good point,

PItt is 0-2 Vs AFC west opponents this season but they were both away games..................

[ngates815]

So like I said, getting back to the faux sharp question....

Like I said, from the beginning...+13 pts and sprinkle some on the ML +510.

Sounds like a Lakerboy thread, a "faux sharp".

I'm not betting the game. But I laugh at people that start threads making it seem as if they may be betting a big underdog, then come back after game is over confirming that they did actually indeed bet on the game and this thread is there evidence.

[No coincidences]

Always the same bullshit with this, No Coin kid.....every time he gets buried, which is often....the other guy is only betting points.....

I can tell this hit home for you, since you are the same way.

If I could transfer all of my SBR points to you so that you could flush them all, I would DD. I truly would.

[PAULYPOKER]

What do previous seasons have to do with this matchup tonight?

What does any prediction/pick/personal opinion "including yours" have to do with tonight's match-up?

[k13]

5dimes has Charles 57.5 o/u rushing

Some Euro Books have 68.5 o/u

Hmm

[No coincidences]

But I laugh at people that start threads making it seem as if they may be betting a big underdog, then come back after game is over confirming that they did actually indeed bet on the game and this thread is there evidence.

If that were the case, wouldn't I just post 'CHIEFS +13 -- LOCK!!!' like most of the idiots around here?

I haven't bet the game either. I started this thread to try and stir up legitimate discussion and reasoning behind backing the Chiefs. Instead I get Sammy bragging about a -550 win and PavlovDawson back on the e-stalking path. Only at SBR.

[No coincidences]

What does any prediction/pick/personal opinion "including yours" have to do with tonight's match-up?

The same as what happened in a PIT/KC game 7 years ago -- nothing.

[DudleyDawson]

I can tell this hit home for you, since you are the same way.

If I could transfer all of my SBR points to you so that you could flush them all, I would DD. I truly would.

Check my point history, kid....many donations and gift cards bought with points...but yea OK, I get it...we all bet points and you're the only one here betting cash, oh that's right, dumbfukk you bet $10 a game...betting $10 a game and having 41,000 plus posts = life buried, sorry fruit-cake, it's true.

[Sam Odom]

Instead I get Sammy bragging about a -550 win

Dummy , you brought it up 1st , see post #7

kid , you're waaayyyy over your head

[DudleyDawson]

All the gambling knowledge this dip shit has but he only bets $10 a pop, what does that tell you?

[ngates815]

If that were the case, wouldn't I just post 'CHIEFS +13 -- LOCK!!!' like most of the idiots around here?

I haven't bet the game either. I started this thread to try and stir up legitimate discussion and reasoning behind backing the Chiefs. Instead I get Sammy bragging about a -550 win and PavlovDawson back on the e-stalking path. Only at SBR.

I'm not saying you are one of those guys, but I see it around here plenty.


And to the other guy talking about "value"...To me that's just a word that "sharps" use all the time.

Value is just ones perception. You can say there is value in KC +510...I can turn around and say there is value in Pitt -600. Which one of us is right? Nobody fukkin knows til after the game, but an argument can be made before the game for both teams having value at those lines I'm sure.

[PAULYPOKER]

This thread is information overload chaos,


Brought to you by sponsored groups of industry

[No coincidences]

I'm not saying you are one of those guys, but I see it around here plenty.


And to the other guy talking about "value"...To me that's just a word that "sharps" use all the time.

Value is just ones perception. You can say there is value in KC +510...I can turn around and say there is value in Pitt -600. Which one of us is right? Nobody fukkin knows til after the game, but an argument can be made before the game for both teams having value at those lines I'm sure.

Exactly. I'm just wondering why people on KC are taking KC. That's all.

[DudleyDawson]

I can tell this hit home for you, since you are the same way.

If I could transfer all of my SBR points to you so that you could flush them all, I would DD. I truly would.

Order #8304

<label>Purchaser</label> No coincidences
<label>Total Cost</label> 832 points
Items Ordered:

1. $100 BetJamaica Free Play
   

DudleyDawson's Point History

62E71B	4/24/2012 11:20 PM	Order id: 16151	DudleyDawson	SBR	Store Purchase	-1,168 [COLOR=#000 !important]453.00[/COLOR]
62B801	4/22/2012 11:32 PM	Order id: 16121	DudleyDawson	SBR	Store Purchase	-2,647 [COLOR=#000 !important]358.00[/COLOR]
62B7EC	4/22/2012 11:23 PM	Order id: 16120	DudleyDawson	SBR	Store Purchase	-325 [COLOR=#000 !important]3,005.00[/COLOR]
62B620	4/22/2012 7:27 PM	Order id: 16115	DudleyDawson	SBR	Store Purchase	-325 [COLOR=#000 !important]475.00[/COLOR]
5F3D47	3/16/2012 12:33 AM	Order id: 15539	DudleyDawson	SBR	Store Purchase	-1,168 [COLOR=#000 !important]513.00[/COLOR]
5F328B	3/15/2012 12:03 PM	Order id: 15526	DudleyDawson	SBR	Store Purchase	-440 [COLOR=#000 !important]0.00[/COLOR]
5DF520	3/02/2012 12:02 AM	Order id: 15260	DudleyDawson	SBR	Store Purchase	-1,168 [COLOR=#000 !important]482.00[/COLOR]

Gee I must be doing something right, we-todd.

[No coincidences]

Dummy , you brought it up 1st , see post #7

kid , you're waaayyyy over your head

You felt the need to post your typical useless bullshit here first. You say "don't overthink it," then later say you don't even know what -- or if -- you're playing here. So why even post in the first place? Lonely like DD?

[No coincidences]

Order #8304

<label>Purchaser</label> No coincidences
<label>Total Cost</label> 832 points
Items Ordered:

1. $100 BetJamaica Free Play

DudleyDawson's Point History

62E71B	4/24/2012 11:20 PM	Order id: 16151	DudleyDawson	SBR	Store Purchase	-1,168 [COLOR=#000 !important]453.00[/COLOR]
62B801	4/22/2012 11:32 PM	Order id: 16121	DudleyDawson	SBR	Store Purchase	-2,647 [COLOR=#000 !important]358.00[/COLOR]
62B7EC	4/22/2012 11:23 PM	Order id: 16120	DudleyDawson	SBR	Store Purchase	-325 [COLOR=#000 !important]3,005.00[/COLOR]
62B620	4/22/2012 7:27 PM	Order id: 16115	DudleyDawson	SBR	Store Purchase	-325 [COLOR=#000 !important]475.00[/COLOR]
5F3D47	3/16/2012 12:33 AM	Order id: 15539	DudleyDawson	SBR	Store Purchase	-1,168 [COLOR=#000 !important]513.00[/COLOR]
5F328B	3/15/2012 12:03 PM	Order id: 15526	DudleyDawson	SBR	Store Purchase	-440 [COLOR=#000 !important]0.00[/COLOR]
5DF520	3/02/2012 12:02 AM	Order id: 15260	DudleyDawson	SBR	Store Purchase	-1,168 [COLOR=#000 !important]482.00[/COLOR]

Gee I must be doing something right, we-todd.

So you post up the one free play I bought with a book that's now out of business it was so long ago, yet you're posting your points track record from last April. Wow.

It's amazing that crusty buries you over and over and over again and you still feel like you have a leg to stand on with this. Again, only at SBR.