Well, You Can't Say I Didn't Try

[LT Profits]

Nicky,

Admit it. You never wanted to play in the first place. At the first opportunity you hollered bloody murder.
LT showed that he was afraid too, by hiding behind a technicality.

Personally, I think you both have too much to lose. If either one of you loses over 500 games, it would make you look bad here. And this is very possible even if you're both good winning players.....which I seriously doubt in the first place.

What am I afraid of? I was the one that tried my best to make this work today with live lines.

And I think I already resonded to this, but I was not hiding behind a technicality, I was trying to enforce the rules as they were written at the time with the evidence I had at the time. It wasn't until the following morning that SBR Odds showed +183 instread of +181. Anyone that has played in any of my contests knows that I am always fair.

[tacomax]

Admit it. You never wanted to play in the first place. At the first opportunity you hollered bloody murder.

That was very apparent.

LT showed that he was afraid too, by hiding behind a technicality.

On Nicky's first bet, LT played by the rules that both of them chose. If players don't play by the rules, then why have a contest in the first place? Later on, Nicky wanted to be credited for a bet he forgot to post.

Personally, I think you both have too much to lose. If either one of you loses over 500 games, it would make you look bad here. And this is very possible even if you're both good winning players.....which I seriously doubt in the first place.

I don't think either would look bad for losing, it would make for a full contest. I think a lot less of Nicky for acting like a 5 year old than I ever would if he went 0-500.

Still LT tries to re-start the contest, Nicky says that in the case of any queries he is automatically right. Hmmm.

Just proves that Nicky is full of a mixture of shit and hot air. Not that proof was needed by way of this contest.

[LT Profits]

Nicky,

Admit it. You never wanted to play in the first place. At the first opportunity you hollered bloody murder.
LT showed that he was afraid too, by hiding behind a technicality.

Personally, I think you both have too much to lose. If either one of you loses over 500 games, it would make you look bad here. And this is very possible even if you're both good winning players.....which I seriously doubt in the first place.

I just caught this last part. You want to compare sportsbook balances? Not to mention the fact that I have yet to have a losing season in any sport in plays posted right here in the forum.

[VegasDave]

I have an idea! Lets all repeat our opinions on this another couple hundred times over the span of another 20 - 50 threads, that will certainly resolve the issue

[reno cool]

You could have taken the high road and said : "Whatever, keep your 2 points. I'm going to snap you off anyway. Lets try to clear the rules up a bit for tomorrow."

[MonkeyF0cker]

I don't think LT is trying to hide. Afterall, he posts his picks here everyday anyway. Nicky is the one dodging this. It is clear to anyone with half of a brain.

[LT Profits]

I have always been a stickler for following rules to the letter, which is why my contests always run smoothly. If he would have just admitted that +181 was the proper line at the time given the rules, life would have been fine and I even would have given him the +183 when I saw it in the archives the next day.

[Panic]

This thing should have been resolved...long, long, ago. Both you guys are trying to save face. Enough already. There isnt a serious gambler out there that doesnt look at this situation and laugh. For 2k, you guys are bickering back and forth like novices. You cant tell me...either one of you have laid 2k on a game...contest....what have you and done it in a lot less time. This is ridiculous. Its becoming a joke.

[Nicky Santoro]

reno,

also, after seeing LT's history of betting, i am now more fearless than anyone can ever be. he's a steam chaser and never gets the good # in any hockey game. he always has the worst of the #.. LOL

also, did i just hear you LT say you want to compare balances.. cause if you do, i will gladly do this with you..

[daggerkobe]

Oviously Nicky wanted to do this, as it wasn't him who cried bloody murder over 2 cents, which was immediately verified by all the major line services as well as SBR, eventually.

LT could have just waited and amended the vague & retarded rule later that night or next day to make sure it wouldn't happen... but nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooo he had to act like a dickhead, attacking his integrity and whining about cheating.

They mutually amend the rules and agree to continue, only for LT to back out at the last minute. He doesn't want any part of Nicky, it's obvious.

[tacomax]

I have an idea! Lets all repeat our opinions on this another couple hundred times over the span of another 20 - 50 threads, that will certainly resolve the issue

We've had two days now. After 498 days of further discussion, we can let the forum decide who the winner should be.

[durito]

Quite frankly I'm not sure what either one of you has to gain from this contest. 500 bets isn't sufficient to prove anything. And if you have $2,000 just lying around ready for this contest (that you can tie up with no interest for 6 months) I'm not sure you are being real efficient with your bankroll.

[treece]

No professional plays at 5 dimes. They cut your limits after a week. LT doesn't like me, Richkas or Nicky. He robbed me in a contest just like he robs people who buy his picks. I just put a double voodoo spell on him.

[durito]

No professional plays at 5 dimes. They cut your limits after a week. LT doesn't like me, Richkas or Nicky. He robbed me in a contest just like he robs people who buy his picks. I just put a double voodoo spell on him.

You cheated to try and win $25. I'm sure you can play at 5dimes.