i don't see a major win for tiger in a while maybe next year but i doubt it
 SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks |
Best Sportsbooks List
|
|
| |||||
| #1 FanDuel | SBR rating 4.8/5 | Review | #6 BetRivers | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review | #2 Caesars | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #7 Fanatics | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review |
| #3 DraftKings | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #8 Betway | SBR rating 3.8/5 | Review | ||
| #4 BetMGM | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #9 Borgata | SBR rating 3.5/5 | Review | ||
| #5 bet365 | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #10 ClutchBet | SBR rating 2.9/5 | Review | ||
-
08-02-11 04:26 PM #36
-
08-03-11 05:28 PM #37
let's not forget the greatest golfers all win tourneys in their forties and some even in their fifties,Tom Watson almost won the British a few years ago.
The domination might be over but Tiger will win more tourneys IMO
-
08-03-11 05:30 PM #38
couldnt agree more gwiz. he's got another 10 years of being in the mix. he'll find a way.
-
08-03-11 05:59 PM #39
I like Badds over Poulter. Badds much better putter and scrambler.
-
08-03-11 07:14 PM #40
good read yy.
that easily qualified as one of our plays.
we'll have 9 tournament plays in each tourney this week, unless the lines drastically change in the next few hours. (16-3 on tourney plays to date)
Baddeley +105 v Poulter is one of them
DataBet PGA Power Rankings
-
08-03-11 09:00 PM #41
I like Hass over Schwartzel too.
-
08-03-11 09:26 PM #42
At 5D:
Tiger +1600 / Field -2500
Tigers o/u finish 30.5
Go jump on it all you Tiger humpers!
-
08-03-11 10:34 PM #43
Good thread. All the love for Tiger is money at this point. Cheers
-
08-04-11 12:57 AM #44
Lets see what is he going to do. is he going to be same as old or some new performance.
-
08-04-11 01:01 AM #45
wtf said it best...wait til tiger has his 1 good round then fade/lay him on the betting exchanges....
Originally Posted by jarvol
-
08-04-11 05:18 PM #46
You guys are kicking ass. Im with you on all except I'm the other way with Jacobson over Toms. Great job last 3 weeks now. Good Luck Originally Posted by holygrail3
-
08-04-11 05:25 PM #47
thanks yy.
i do have to say, if i could have only bet one, it would've been Toms +110 over Jacobson.
GIR and Bogey Avoidance are the 2 heaviest weighted stats this week based on our research. Secondly, everyone makes putts on this course, and Jacobson's biggest strength is putting. Putting was one of the least weighted stats this week.
Toms ranks in GIR and Bogey Avoidance on TOUR this year: 1st and 1st, respectively.
DataBet PGA Power Rankings
-
08-04-11 05:25 PM #48
He did ok today
Not out of it
-
08-04-11 05:30 PM #49
Wow. That's interesting. Yeah JJ, Tiger made everything though(27 putts). He hit 36% F/ways and he's 2 under. The putter was hot like the old days but everything was for par! That crooked driver is going to catch up with him I think.
-
08-04-11 05:31 PM #50
He should be smiling ear to ear he found a way to be 2 under today.
-
08-04-11 05:33 PM #51
I think Pampling over Curtis was a slam dunk. Pampling is going through financial trouble and he needs it more than anyone right now.
-
08-04-11 05:35 PM #52
Might be his low round for the week. Now the fade is really on! Originally Posted by holygrail3
-
08-04-11 05:38 PM #53
Can't believe putting is ever LAST. Look at The Deere, everybody makes putts out there and Stricker owns it, the best putter. Originally Posted by holygrail3
-
08-04-11 05:41 PM #54
If Toms beats Freddie I will buy next week. Just getting me off that bet alone would have been more than worth the money. Do
you guys rank your picks and give certain reasons for your sides?
-
08-04-11 05:45 PM #55
It's still part of the equation this week, but not nearly as much as usual.
And remember, other stats we use in our formula, such as birdie avg, bogey avoidance, weighted scoring avg, etc... already having putting ability somewhat incorporated.
We usually value putting inside 10 feet quite a bit, just not nearly as much this week.
In doing our research for Firestone we found this tip: This week, putting takes a relative backseat, Firestone has averaged inside ten one-thousandths on either side of 0.000 in strokes gained-putting in all of the last six editions
DataBet PGA Power Rankings
-
08-04-11 06:10 PM #56
No, we don't really rank our picks, that would negate the idea behind the system wouldn't it? Your back to picking and choosing instead of using the formula to find all the lines that are worth betting. Also, we don't take any line past -125, no point in laying those odds, you have to win such a high % of bets long term to show a profit(Over 60%). The reasoning is they have an aggregate advantage in our formula. They either qualify to be a play or not.
We're only on matchups that have an extreme aggregate advantage in our favor, and also what are great value plays such as Glover +125 v Allenby. We had Glover a better fit for this course, not enough to be a play at say -110 or -115, but the line opens at +105 and then continues to move in our favor and closes at some books at +130. Pampling +130 v Curtis is another play in that spot.
We do include what the heaviest weighted categories are in our first email to members on Wednesday night.
DataBet PGA Power Rankings
-
08-04-11 06:20 PM #57
That's really interesting. So the whole field is tighter in strokes gained? I would guess the opposite would be like Augusta right?
-
08-04-11 06:22 PM #58
Right, or any British open, where there are so many 7-10 footers for Par
-
08-04-11 06:25 PM #59
waton's swing hasn't changed in 60 years..tiger changed every minute no way tiger wins another major,lost to much distance. did you see the geek on tigers bag, not what I expected to see...brain bell looked out of place.
-
08-04-11 06:33 PM #60
plus yy, we're betting these as well. i care more if they win and that we are onto something concrete, then if anyone buys it.
it's just too much work to put out there for free
we tracked this angle for about a year and it ended up +210 units in 41 tourneys. just like last year, as the season goes along we become more and more accurate.
-
08-04-11 07:00 PM #61
Great stuff.
-
08-04-11 07:30 PM #62
Dear GOD I hope that Adam Scott wins the tourney, that will piss off Tiger like nothing before, and just to hear Steve say "nice to get a paycheck this year" LOL
-
08-04-11 08:03 PM #63
Adam Scott is a pussbag
He ain't winnin shlt
-
08-04-11 08:49 PM #64
Good to see him out there. Hope he makes the cut.
-
08-04-11 10:05 PM #65
there is no cut
-
08-05-11 12:17 PM #66
jack's record will be broken...Tiger is still Tiger....Bank on it
-
08-05-11 11:37 PM #67
Why arent there any threads about Phil sucking cokk? If anyone is all set it's FIGJAM...fukk him
-
08-06-11 06:57 AM #68
I bet after the 2000 season you were saying Jason Giambi would break Babe Ruth's record too "bank it" Originally Posted by immy5150
-
08-06-11 09:09 AM #69
don't ya think that senario might be a little different...lmao at YOU
-
08-06-11 09:22 AM #70
^
What's different?
Both athletes had their season for the ages in 2000, both athletes were juiced on PED's in 2000 when they were having their season for the ages, and both athletes are still in the game, mere shells of what they once were.
Reply With Quote
