1. #36
    dg84
    dg84's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-05-11
    Posts: 30
    Betpoints: 481

    Stanford lost their coach, 80% of their OL, most of their top recievers & they have no depth on the DL. Stanford isn't one of those schools that just reloads & continues dominating. They should still be very good & with their schedule they could go 9-3 or even 10-2, but they aren't nearly as good as last year. They should be 7-0 to start the year because of an incredibly easy schedule, but i see 2 or 3 losses late. Definitely not a top 5 team.

  2. #37
    TrapperDapper
    TrapperDapper's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-20-10
    Posts: 502
    Betpoints: 4721

    Tx A&M has no business in the top 10. Put Ohio St at 10 and call it a day.

  3. #38
    chunk
    chunk's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-08-11
    Posts: 805
    Betpoints: 19168

    Quote Originally Posted by dg84 View Post
    Stanford lost their coach, 80% of their OL, most of their top recievers & they have no depth on the DL. Stanford isn't one of those schools that just reloads & continues dominating. They should still be very good & with their schedule they could go 9-3 or even 10-2, but they aren't nearly as good as last year. They should be 7-0 to start the year because of an incredibly easy schedule, but i see 2 or 3 losses late. Definitely not a top 5 team.
    Agree. If they didn't have Luck returning, they wouldn't eve be considered.

First 12
Top