im considering playing BAL on the RL, with the 20 cents the line moved since it opened the RL looks a lot better at +100
on3's MLB 2012 Opening Game system thread 194-8 last year +60 units
Collapse
X
-
on3SBR MVP
- 08-23-10
- 2197
#2556Comment -
knugenSBR MVP
- 12-09-09
- 2612
#2557High five!!!!Comment -
on3SBR MVP
- 08-23-10
- 2197
#2558treading water...now we need BAL to win and have a good set of series' this wknd with no C games.Comment -
Wallco99SBR Hall of Famer
- 01-01-11
- 7261
#2559I've been playing ALL these games on the R/L lately. Hit mets today for +182 at -1 1/2. A series loss is only 7 units this way and the wins net more than 1 unit.Originally posted by on3im considering playing BAL on the RL, with the 20 cents the line moved since it opened the RL looks a lot better at +100Comment -
J.M. DiscipleSBR Hall of Famer
- 11-16-10
- 5154
#2560Would not lead too many people astray with this method. This has already been tested and is not profitable long run. At least not in a chase A-B-C method. I forgot the name of person who tested it, but did a great job on testing ML, RL, and also -1 I believe where ML proved to best method with taking RL on the C wagers I believe.Originally posted by Wallco99I've been playing ALL these games on the R/L lately. Hit mets today for +182 at -1 1/2. A series loss is only 7 units this way and the wins net more than 1 unit.
The way things have been going lately though and the way on3 runs his labby taking a -1.5RL is ok seeing how no new numbers are added to the labby lines.Comment -
Wallco99SBR Hall of Famer
- 01-01-11
- 7261
#2561Don't care, it's how I'm playing it. And if I wish to state that I am playing that way, I will, I didn't tell anyone else to do it. They are big boys, they don't need me to "lead them astray". The system itself can't even be thoroughly backtested, since lists of opening 5dimes lines doesn't exist, so I'm sure any spin-off back tests involving run lines will be just as inaccurate. And even if it doesn't work, what does it really matter, It's not like this system is doing any good the other way either. The same kind of comments were made during the NBA when stevex and I stated we were playing all the JM games @ -110, and we did fine, regardless of what tests said that we wouldn't.Originally posted by J.M. DiscipleWould not lead too many people astray with this method. This has already been tested and is not profitable long run. At least not in a chase A-B-C method. I forgot the name of person who tested it, but did a great job on testing ML, RL, and also -1 I believe where ML proved to best method with taking RL on the C wagers I believe.
The way things have been going lately though and the way on3 runs his labby taking a -1.5RL is ok seeing how no new numbers are added to the labby lines.Comment -
knugenSBR MVP
- 12-09-09
- 2612
#2562Time for a B win tonight, feels like years ago we had a B bet winComment -
on3SBR MVP
- 08-23-10
- 2197
#2563UPDATED for 08/10/2012
System(s) record Chase:
Regular system: 129-13-0; Profit: -47.25 units
Filtered System: 44-3-0; Profit: -4.5 units
5/2 chase: 18-3-0; profit: -4 units
Records: (regular, filtered, 5/2)
Game 1 (A) win = 82-63; 27-19
Game 2 (B) win = 34-25; 11-11; 11-10
Game 3 (C) win = 13-13; 6-3; 7-3
LABBY LINES FOR 08/10/2012
x-x-50-175
192-197-225-225
223-103-x-x
New Line Filtered
100-104-96-86
134-130-127-186
REGULAR FOR 08/10/2012
(B) BAL -115 to win 225
(A) SF -230/+100 to win 175 -- play RL
