MLB 2014 BigDogs Thread "New Light Version"

[fitguy67]

OP's shopping report,
note i managed to beat the fdm-benchmark prices on 6 of the 7 plays, netting a "shopping score" of about +35 payout points or an average of about +5 per play

the better prices you can get, day-in/day-out...will make a huge difference over the course of the hundreds of plays that make up the rest of the season

skdld	away	(abc)		nsst= near skdld starting time
st. time	HOME	(ABC)	price	price		booking
(edt)	team	opponent	quoted	actual	book	time	status
1308	min	DET	147	143	grk	655	U
1410	CHW	kan	135	145	her	700	U
1410	HOU	tam	156	161	pin	705	U
1605	col	SFO	182	183	her	710	U
1605	nyy	OAK	163	166	her	715	U
1610	tex	SEA	168	177	her	720	U
1610	arz	LAD	135	138	pin	725	U

[alamo]

Good luck with the plays Fit.

[fitguy67]

take this play as an example

HOU

+156

68.97

107.59

because i got it for 5 points better at +161

for me I only need to risk $66.83 to win the same $107.59

meaning if this play loses, my account benefits by a surprisingly-large $2.14, which is a more than 3%-discount off the loss...and this discount applies to the 60% of all losing plays...meaning it averages out to about 1.8% over each and every play...that was for 5 ticks...meaning the long-term benefit of a single point is a little over a third of a percentage point...doesn't sound like much, does it...

but a capper who can net 3% yield in the long run...is like a 0.300 hitter in baseball...a sign of rare excellence...
so if you can just sharpen your shopping skills to getting just 3 tics better, it'll kick in more than 1% toward your performance...

these figures are % of total action...over a baseball season, 1% of 90k risked ( $100 x 5 plays a day for six months) is $900 = 9u

so arranging things (mostly getting a few more books) so you can comparison shop and "shave off" a few ticks like this on average...can benefit you by hundreds of $...and tens of units over the course of a season

[fitguy67]

Good luck with the plays Fit.

note the new status indicator in top left

SOD7 (Start Of Day7...before any plays even submitted...clean slate)
DIP7 (Day7 In Progress...some action appears...but slate not fully graded)
EOD7 (EndOfDay7...full slate of "all plays since previous EOD-update<ie. EOD6>" appear, with all plays graded)

DIP7	sun	15-Jun	prev. values at top of table/changes & new totals at bottom
5,379.35	153.80	1142.8	1757.66	9	8	922.63	543.28	379.35
107.59	p	V	T	W/L	days	A	S	N=A-S
min	147	73.19	107.59	U	since prv
CHW	135	79.7	107.59	U	1
HOU	156	68.97	107.59	U	no action
col	182	59.12	107.59	U	0
nyy	163	66.01	107.59	U	on calendar
tex	168	64.04	107.59	U	7
arz	135	79.7	107.59	U	of business
					7
∆	153.5	490.73	753.13	0	0	0.00	0.00	0.00
Σ	153.7	1633.53	2510.79	9	8	922.63	543.28	379.35
c.prv	164	14-Jun	6	c.lnq	5,000.00	5379.35	B=	5379.35
c.ths	165	15-Jun	7	158	50.00	107.59	t =	107.59

[fitguy67]

NTS (Note(s) to Self):

*the most important of these reports by far are the EODx's...
and it's ok to let days pass between EODx reports...eg EOD6 done and the figures all show up at what is now called SOD7 or DIP7...
if life gets busy...or i were to simple decide to switch to weekly reporting...i could just keep adding plays to the bottom of the action section <note to self (henceforth, NTS)...add a date-specifying column to "action" section for when this happens>...all "previous" tallies across the top will remain unchanged...the additional action will simply account for more plays/days before the "changes" row getss locked in, allowing the DIP I'm working on to be converted into an EODxx, with the "x" registered appropriate to the number of days of action since last EOD

thus could easily have EOD5, EOD6, EOD7, EOD11, EOD18,...where the EODx reports on cards covering the action of 1, 1, 4, and 7 calendar days respectively

*find a better way to incorporate the "business days" = "days with plays" = "number of slates" idea...days on the calendar are generally the far more important concept, but, just as with ineffective plays (anything submitted but ultimately NOT graded as a W or L)...the information for inactive/ineffective days should similarly be retained somewhere as a "side tally", even tho' it's not important enough to clutter up the concise EODx reporting format

*and i still gotta figure out that damn "snipping"/"cropping" horseshit

[fitguy67]

Read'em and Weep...then look a little closer...and smile!

1. the bad news: today (day#7) was 2-5, -1.3673u

2. more bad news: we ended the first week with a dreadful 11-13 record...that's a cringe-worthy 45.83%...

3. but there's a wee bit of good news, too: we ended the week +2.4262u...(which is a very nice +15% of the total 16.3353 units risked so far)

moral of the story: it's very possible...i depend on it, in fact...to have a losing W-L record and be a solid $-winner...
that's the power of an all-dog fleet of plays

EOD7	sun	15-Jun	prev. values at top of table/changes & new totals at bottom
5,379.35	153.80	1142.8	1757.66	9	8	922.63	543.28	379.35
107.59	+prices	Ventured	Targeted	status	#days	A	S	N=A-S
min	147	73.19	107.59	L	since prv		73.19	-73.19
CHW	135	79.7	107.59	L	1		79.70	-79.70
HOU	156	68.97	107.59	L	no action		68.97	-68.97
col	182	59.12	107.59	W	0	107.59		107.59
nyy	163	66.01	107.59	L	on calendar		66.01	-66.01
tex	168	64.04	107.59	L	7		64.04	-64.04
arz	135	79.7	107.59	W	of business	107.59		107.59
					7
∆	153.5	490.73	753.13	2	5	215.18	351.91	-136.73
Σ	153.7	1633.53	2510.79	11	13	1,137.81	895.19	242.62
164	c.prv	14-Jun	6	c.lnq	5,000.00	5379.35	B=	5242.62
165	c.ths	15-Jun	7	158	50.00	107.59	t =	104.85

Cliff's Notes
everything is based on a generic startingB= I = 5000 and fixed $100 units, with each new day's plays reset to win exactly one "twinit" or t =2% of the latest B = I + N

[fitguy67]

doing an experiment to see if one lil' post is sufficient to "bump" this back up to first page...my guess is no...because of views/day etc criterion no-doubt built into the webware...also may auto-discount posts by OP to bump his own thread into the exalted limelight of page 1, lol

[Sixla]

What plays we lookin at today Fit?

[fitguy67]

no games till 19-ish...let the prices "breathe" till about 18...at which time anything over +135 at dimey is in play

(i've decided to, for myself, not turn my nose up at any opportunities to lock in something at/over the 200 mark...so far, 0-1 on these very-rare plays...but it will simplify the "rule of thumb" greatly to only have one threshold value, 135--a lower boundary--to consider...instead of two)...

i want any/everybody not hurt by this to mentally support Iran for me...I picked 'em up, effectively @ -0.5hc, early in the 2nd half at scoreless-tie, at +622

Iran (live, 0-0 at HT) -0.5, +622..........-0.5u / +3.11u

i covered my ass with a second bet as well

Iran/Nigeria, FT-Draw, +105...........-0.4762u / + 0.5

________________

effectively, this works out to an Iran +0 (aka. "pk", aka. "dnb"...soccer betting is so frigging complicated) @ +269.80............ -0.9762u / +2.6338u

only thing that can hurt me (rather badly...almost a full unit) is a Nigeria win...
a draw is a push...
but if Iran can score late and "shock the world"...i'll be +2.6 units

[fitguy67]

well i got my underwear back...ended a draw...flat dollars (but some small laundery-related expenses to factor in)...

all in all...i HATE betting on soccer

[fitguy67]

Ok, today's full TTD record and today's play-sheet all rolled into one

note: all the important shit is bold-faced

all $ figures are appropriate to an ac setup with a starting bank 5000...pro-rate as appropriate

if you're actually following along closely, note how all seven numbers across the top (in columns 3 thru 9) are filled with exactly the same numbers that showed up at the bottom of the previously-posted table...
end of day#7 = start of day#8

...and away we go

DIP8	mon	16-Jun	prev. values at top of table/changes & new totals at bottom
5,242.62	153.70	1633.53	2510.79	11	13	1,137.81	895.19	242.62
104.85	+prices	Ventured	Targeted	status	#days	A	S	N=A-S
min	162	64.72	104.85	U	since prv
nym	139	75.43	104.85	U	1
tex	150	69.9	104.85	U	no action
col	171	61.32	104.85	U	0
					on calendar
					8
					of business
					8
∆	154.5	271.37	419.40	0	0	0.00	0.00	0.00
Σ	153.8	1904.9	2930.19	11	13	1,137.81	895.19	242.62
165	c.prv	15-Jun	7	c.lnq	5,000.00	5242.62	B=	5242.62
166	c.ths	16-Jun	8	158	50.00	104.85	t =	104.85

[fitguy67]

complete shopping report of OP's "fills"...

NTS (note(s) to self): damn i gotta get fdm (aka. 5d) funded again! this is the first day where i had to really pay for its not being up and running

*overall i was only able to shave two tics off of the whole "cart"'s price of 622...i paid 620

*i'm thinking of employing a simple new shopping "rule of thumb" to decide whether to bite or not if there's still a lot of time before game starts/mkt-closes...
try to exceed the reference "snapshot" price as usual of course, but if it looks like that "boat" may not come around again anytime soon...then, it's ok to bite at something lower as long as
a) it meets/exceeds +135 of course, AND
b) it at least meets/exceeds the day's opening price

eg. col opened at +161, was snapshotted at +171 about 1800...but it was clear that it wasn't going to hit this level again any time soon (at books i have current access to...why not having fdm--the "snapshotting" book--is such a drag)...anyhow, i wanted to lock in the play...best price available at 1820 was +166 at heritage...giving me two choices...either hit it now (most convenient)...or, since the game doesn't start till 2210, i could simply check back later and "keep trying" to meet/beat the official +171...i chose door #1, locked it in at +166 because it was clearly "good enough"...beating both +135 minimum and the day opener of +166 (i'll call this the "2 outa 3 ain't bad" rule)

skdld	away	(abc)		nsst= near skdld starting time
st. time	HOME	(ABC)	price	price		booking
(edt)	team	opponent	quoted	actual	book	time	status
1910	min	BOS	162	159	her	1815	U
2010	nym	STL	139	140	sia	1817	U
2205	tex	OAK	150	155	sia	1819	U
2210	col	LAD	171	166	her	1821	U

[fitguy67]

only other "possible" (unofficial as far as thread-record goes) addition is kan (@ DET)...they opened nicely at +141...and have since shortened to their current +129ish price...not quite unloved-enough...

if we start biting at things below +135, it gets harder to maintain a fleet average over the crucial +150 figure (after 24 plays our average price is about +154)...you might want to take this play as part of another betting project (including the old "freestyle" one we all use too much), perhaps make one for teams that started out unloved (+135 min)...but found enough love later in the day to close stronger...but it is not takeable as a play as part of this project that tries to buy things that close (not open) in the stated range

[fitguy67]

kan at +131...has 8 more minutes to weaken another 4 points at dimey

nope...4 official plays for tonight it is...unless something interesting happens closer to the starts of the 2140 mil/ARZ game (unlikely) and the 2210 sdg/SEA game (also unlikely)

c u guyz tomoro

[Sixla]

Locked and loaded!

[fitguy67]

all-in-one
early-bird
look back = TTD (first 8 days: 12-16, +1.46u)

& look ahead = snapshot of 5 official plays for today (with mean price +150.5+153.3 over all 33 playsTD)

may not check back in till tomorrow...got the m.o for this project pretty well sorted now...
just a case of walking thru most of the rest of the season with it
(may/may not "sit out" the last few weeks of the season)

DIP9	tue	17-Jun	prev. values at top of table/changes & new totals at bottom
5,146.00	153.82	1904.9	2930.19	12	16	1,242.66	1,096.66	146.00
102.92	+prices	Ventured	Targeted	status	#days	A	S	N=A-S
tor	153	67.27	102.92	U	since prv
kan	138	74.58	102.92	U	1
phi	158	65.14	102.92	U	no action
nym	149	69.07	102.92	U	0
col	156	65.97	102.92	U	on calendar
					9
					of business
					9
∆	150.5	342.03	514.60	0	0	0.00	0.00	0.00
Σ	153.3	2246.93	3444.79	12	16	1,242.66	1,096.66	146
166	c.prv	16-Jun	8	c.lnq	5,000.00	5146	B=	5146
167	c.ths	17-Jun	9	158	50.00	102.92	t =	102.92

[pacocn]

Fit, nice looking card!!!! Bol

[fitguy67]

thanks...i spent minutes "capping it"...and i finally got the recording/reporting stuff "in a box" as well...so the "word blizzards" (gotta trademark that term...probably end up in a legal battle with the "dairy queen" corporation over it...so hold off on that, for now) should lessen in frequency and intensity

[fitguy67]

still plenty of time before 1905--> games get underway...and another 2 plays clearly fall into our range...
hou + 141
min + 155

makes 7 plays in total for my actual account, 2 latest shown at the bottom

skdld	away	(abc)	1010	nsst= near skdld starting time
st. time	HOME	(ABC)	price	price		booking
(edt)	team	opponent	quoted	actual	book	time	status
1905	tor	NYY	153	157	her	~1030	U
1908	kan	DET	138	145	sia	~1030	U
1910	phi	ATL	158	160	her	~1030	U
2015	nym	STL	149	156	grk	~1030	U
2210	col	LAD	156	159	her	~1030	U
1905	hou	WAS	141	145	sia	1815	U
1910	min	BOS	155	153	her	1830	U

[fitguy67]

yesterday: 2-3, +0.0353u
TTD (covering 9 days): 14-19, +1.4953u, avg price over all 33 plays = +153.3

EOD9	tue	17-Jun	prev. values at top of table/changes & new totals at bottom
5,146.00	153.82	1904.9	2930.19	12	16	1,242.66	1,096.66	146.00
102.92	+prices	Ventured	Targeted	status	#days	A	S	N=A-S
tor	153	67.27	102.92	L	since prv		67.27	-67.27
kan	138	74.58	102.92	W	1	102.92		102.92
phi	158	65.14	102.92	W	no action	102.92		102.92
nym	149	69.07	102.92	L	0		69.07	-69.07
col	156	65.97	102.92	L	on calendar		65.97	-65.97
					9
					of business
					9
∆	150.5	342.03	514.60	2	3	205.84	202.31	3.53
Σ	153.3	2246.93	3444.79	14	19	1,448.50	1,298.97	149.53
166	c.prv	16-Jun	8	c.lnq	5,000.00	5146	B=	5149.53
167	c.ths	17-Jun	9	158	50.00	102.92	t =	102.99

[fitguy67]

day#10, Wed, Jun18
6 plays hot off the press

DIP10	wed	18-Jun	prev. values at top of table/changes & new totals at bottom
5,149.53	153.31	2246.93	3444.79	14	19	1,448.50	1,298.97	149.53
102.99	+prices	Ventured	Targeted	status	#days	Add'ns	Subtrac'ns	N=A-S
phi	147	70.01	102.92		since prv
min	157	65.55	102.92		1
nym	137	75.12	102.92		no action
tex	160	64.33	102.92		0
hou	147	70.01	102.92		on calendar
col	190	54.17	102.92		10
					of business
					10
∆	154.7	399.19	617.52	0	0	0.00	0.00	0.00
Σ	153.5	2646.12	4062.31	14	19	1,448.50	1,298.97	149.53
167	c.prv	17-Jun	9	c.lnq	5,000.00	5146	B=	5149.53
168	c.ths	18-Jun	10	158	50.00	102.92	t =	102.99
		2246.93	3444.79	14	19	1,448.50	1,298.97	149.53

[alamo]

Fit, Just curious as to why :-

hou

WAS

+141

min

BOS

+155

didnt make the grade yesterday as both appeared to be comfortably inside the +135 buffer.

[fitguy67]

see and compare post #86 at 10am-ish, declaring the five official plays for the day
with #89 at 18:40ish declaring a few additional plays for my "actual" (not thread's) account...

on post #89, note times on far-right column...i snapshotted the prices and and finalized the official plays (the ones that count for the thread") for the day on a "one and done" basis, as i've done every day since day#1

for the purposes of this thread i decided long ago (in long word blizzards on page 1 or even on the previous thread)..to base official version of day's plays (ie. the ones that'll be included in the "thread record" for the sole purpose of providing a benchmark) on a "one and done" basis on the first look at a snapshot of the prices...

yes, yesterday i personally went 2-5, not 2-3...and on other days i've gone 2-0 on unofficial plays i've entered after the original posting and not counted it...

i had to draw the line somewhere to keep my sanity...just decided to prepare an official play list once early in the day before day's first pitch...with everything after that--win or lose--not to appear on the thread record

overall, i'm doing quite a lot better than the thread record cuz the prices i get are generally much better than the official 5d prices i record...but i just stick to the original plays AND the original prices...no matter what i actually get...same for plays taken later (they either hurt or help me...even with yesterday's kick in the ass, about even on W-L basis, but nicely up $-wise)...but nothing apart from the original play-list and their prices "count" for the thread record)

"official" really doesn't mean a damn thing...apart from establishing some sort of benchmard to compare against...someone like me (and you) who really follows the intention of this system--to get everything that CLOSES at 5d in the range...will end up with more plays than the "official" thread-record indicates, and thus do better some days/worse others...by taking extra plays within the logic of the method...it all balances out...

please read some of my earlier word blizzards (early in this thread) on just this issue...and how i've decided to take something arbitrary like a once-a-day snapshot just to have something simple (cuz only involves checking prices and shopping all at once, once a day)...and will make a half-assed enough "benchmark" against which anyone may check their own ACTUAL records...the expression i kept mentioning earlier in this (or in the thread that preceded it)...was that 'your actual mileage WILL (not may, WILL) vary"

[fitguy67]

that HOU loss waz a painful card-draw...looked so much like a TJQKA...then a goddam 9 came up...even worse with MIN earlier in the day...scoreless draw...and they score in the top of the 10th...then give up 2 in the bottom...faaaaaakkkk!

the team i am learning to fukkin' hate with a passion is Colorado...it's like they love being raped every day...don't even put up any resistance...

i'm now experimenting with round robins of 2-leg parlays (typical odds about +525...so risking about t/5 on each is just about right)...meaning with the 6-game card tonight i got 15 parlays...set up so that with 3 wins i break even...anything over that goes increasingly wonderful...won 2 of first four...then HOU folded like a cheap tent (baseball and tennis are the worst sports for "breakin' your heart" like that...cuz no clock...execution is required to "close out" the deal)

now i'm stuck with depending on a team that doesn't even seem to TRY to win...hate the fukkin' Rox...

3-6 woulda been fine and dandy...but with the parlay side-plays looks like i'll drop another 2 units on my actual account...cuz it's ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE THAT THE ROCKIES CAN OVERCOME AN EARLY 3-RUN DEFICIT...NOT SURE, BUT I DON'T THINK SUCH A THING HAS EVER BEEN DONE BEFORE (feeble attempt to invoke the "reverse jinx"...when the team isn't even trying to win...just rolling over/begging for vaseline)

[fitguy67]

i'm calling COL a loss...

so day#10 is done: 2-4, and only down 0.4822

overall: 16-23, and still up 1.02u (with only 41% winnaz...the power of dog-prices)

EOD10	wed	18-Jun	prev. values at top of table/changes & new totals at bottom
5,149.53	153.31	2246.93	3444.79	14	19	1,448.50	1,298.97	149.53
102.99	+prices	Ventured	Targeted	status	#days	Add'ns	Subtrac'ns	N=A-S
phi	147	70.01	102.92	W	since prv	102.92		102.92
min	157	65.55	102.92	L	1		65.55	-65.55
nym	137	75.12	102.92	W	no action	102.92		102.92
tex	160	64.33	102.92	L	0		64.33	-64.33
hou	147	70.01	102.92	L	on calendar		70.01	-70.01
col	190	54.17	102.92	L	10		54.17	-54.17
					of business
					10
∆	154.7	399.19	617.52	2	4	205.84	254.06	-48.22
Σ	153.5	2646.12	4062.31	16	23	1,654.34	1,553.03	101.31
167	c.prv	17-Jun	9	c.lnq	5,000.00	5146	B=	5101.31
168	c.ths	18-Jun	10	158	50.00	102.92	t =	102.03

gnyt ladies & germs...

[alamo]

Thanks for answering FitG. Love the thread.

[fitguy67]

skdld	away	(abc)	1010	nsst= near skdld starting time
st. time	HOME	(ABC)	price	price		booking
(edt)	team	opponent	quoted	actual	book	time	status
1308	kan		145				U
1910	hou		142				U
2015	phi		160				U
2205	bos		148				U

today's plays and prices for official thread-recording purposes
5dimes prices as of a minute ago

[fitguy67]

Middle of Day 11 Report...now at critical 40% hit-rate (aka +150 break-even odds)

yield = +1% (30bucks netted vs. the 3000 risked)...
why is the benchmark ac up a little...
because the actual odds we've got are better than the +150 needed to break even
our +153 average to date has break-even odds of 39.53% (=1/2.53...decimal format needed to calculate implied odds)
how much better...hmmm (40/39.53)-1 ~ 1% better

now if you've been getting a FEW ticks better on average on each and every play, things can be MUCH better ...i showed in an earlier post that every single tick improves your yield by ~0.33%...that means if you've been getting 3 ticks better price on each play your yield will be double this

only a week in...1% of volume is only 30 bucks for the u=$100 players...but after a few months we're talking hundreds of dollars...

i guarantee you that if you took all these plays at a shit 20c-line book like wager-web you'll be down quite a bit...

it's not all about the winning and losing...it's the prices you get...cuz it greatly reduces the size of the losses incurred while pursuing the wins...(ask any successful poker player the importance of containing losses...it's also behind my betting "to Win" protocol=using higher payouts to lower the risk, rather than raise the target,...
bet-size will auto-increase on heaters...the trick for long-term success is to dampen the down moves during the L-rich periods...lowering the bet-size def'n, B/50 helps...but the key is NOT dropping full units every time the "expected" occurs...)

if anuyone's been playing these in the standard American hybrid (dogs to risk/faves to win) manner...let me know how you're doing right now with the expected 40% hit-rate...Me, i've always hated full-unit losses on plays that the price i paid tells me to not expect to win, but i'd like to compare notes on this.

MOD11	Thu	19-Jun	prev. values at top of table/changes & new totals at bottom
5,101.31	153.52	2646.12	4062.31	16	23	1,654.34	1,553.03	101.31
102.03	+prices	Ventured	Targeted	status	#days	Add'ns	Subtrac'ns	N=A-S
kan	145	70.37	102.03	L	since prv		70.37	-70.37
hou	142	71.85	102.03	U	1
phi	160	63.77	102.03	U	no action
bos	148	68.94	102.03	U	0
					on calendar
					11
					of business
					11
∆	148.4	274.93	408.12	0	1	0.00	70.37	-70.37
Σ	153.0	2921.05	4470.43	16	24	1,654.34	1,623.40	30.94
168	c.prv	18-Jun	10	c.lnq	5,000.00	5101.31	B=	5030.94
169	c.ths	19-Jun	11	158	50.00	102.03	t =	100.62

[fitguy67]

after first 11 days and 43 plays
of taking most (but not quite all--given the "one sweep a day" logistics of this project)

dogs now 39.53% (17-26 )
avg price (+153) now implies 39.53% needed to break even...
guess what..net change is zero as numbers predict...17-26, -0.0782u

so far, it's ridiculously early to know anything about "how the project's going"
just a few days, a few dozen plays...and one up-move/one down-move, each about 8u

the trick is to stay even-tempered and curiosity-driven
over the long haul: smart dogs shoppers come out ahead for two reasons
1. right off the bat, they're buying things others want less...a natural price-depressant/value-magnifier (especially so when you factor in "the madness of crowds"...especially the greed-driven "don't wanna be left off the boat" crowd, including the name-brand chase systems with monstrous followings)
2. if, in addition, they form the habit of always getting what they get at the best price thru comparison-shopping across different books, each losing play "costs" less

so, we soldier on...still early in the war...only two campaigns (one winning--gained 8 towns, one losing--gave'm back)...
study after study says that for those brave/persistent/consistent/patient enough, this is a winning $-war

I'm "gung ho" and stubbornly-curious enough to keep fighting this out...
besides, being systematically contrarian on a daily basis is entertaining...
who doesn't like to "pull for the underdog" from time to time...i get to do it ALL the time
i subjectively "hope" AND objectively "expect" this to be entertainment i actually get paid for...
but even if it works out the other way...
it's way better than "sweating" out big favorites who are "supposed to win"...and the frustration when they don't...

dogs +curiosity + occasional surprises >> faves + anxiety + occasional disasters

SOD12	fri	20-Jun	EOD11 values at top of table/chgs & new totls below
5101.31	153.04	2921.05	4470.43	17	26	1,756.37	1,764.19	-7.82
102.03	+prices	Ventured	Targeted	status	#days	Add'ns	Subtrac'ns	N=A-S
					since prv
					1
					no action
					0
					on calendar
					11
					of business
					11
∆		0	0.00	0	0	0.00	0.00	0.00
Σ	153.0	2921.05	4470.43	17	26	1,756.37	1,764.19	-7.82
168	c.prv	18-Jun	10	c.lnq	5,000.00	5101.31	B=	4992.18
169	c.ths	19-Jun	11	158	50.00	102.03	t =	99.84

[fitguy67]

today's finalized shopping cart: 4-pack, avg price +166

skdld	away	(abc)		nsst= near skdld starting time			10:00am
st. time	HOME	(ABC)	price	price		booking
(edt)	team	opponent	quoted	actual	book	time	status
1905	atl	WAS	155				U
1910	hou	TAM	183				U
2015	phi	STL	151				U
2205	tex	LAA	175				U
		µ	166.0

[pacocn]

That's my kind of shopping Fit, btw it was Moe's b day yesterday,
please take a moment of silence for the actor that got his start on a
river boat on the Mississippi. Please give a false eye poke and bridge your
nose pointer finger first sometime today. bol on the plays!!!!!!

[fitguy67]

first i was just going to type "soitenly"...

then i looked for a youtubed version...

and from this...emerged 19-minutes of 3-Stooges Heaven

[pacocn]

Fit, that was soitenly the best 19 minutes of my day today, followed closely by the 3 minute interlude with my wife of 14 years this am

[fitguy67]

Fit, that was soitenly the best 19 minutes of my day today, followed closely by the XXX- minute interlude with my wife of 14 years this am

ahhh...tending to ye'olde conjugal duties....

following gene autrey's musical advice on how to start each day...

[pacocn]

whippeeee tay yie yah, totting my old 44, back in the saddle again!!!!!!