2013 MLB thread

**No coincidences** · 07-08-13, 05:57 PM

BOL fellas. I'm out for the night.

Added one more unit to Oakland.

**Speedy88** · 07-08-13, 05:58 PM

G/L Coin, I like Arizona tonight as well.

**bald_guy** · 07-08-13, 06:03 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

ARI -105 (4.2U to win 4)
MIL +122 (2U to win 2.44)
OAK -109 (1.09U to win 1)
CLE +145 (1U to win 1.45)
MIA +148 (1U to win 1.48)

Sort of like MIN and KC, but passing.

Locked and loaded. Lets hope the Diamondbacks don't let us down. They will be key on how we do tonight for sure. Good luck everyone. Thanks for the picks.

**No coincidences** · 07-08-13, 06:09 PM

OAK TT over 3.5 (1.15U to win 1)

**No coincidences** · 07-08-13, 09:30 PM

Roenicke strikes again in Milwaukee. Pulls Lohse after 93 pitches and opens the floodgates with his shitty bullpen. Guy couldn't manage his way out of a paper bag.

**No coincidences** · 07-08-13, 10:01 PM

Arizona getting nickel and dimed to death. Dodgers with nine singles already -- most have just been flares.

**bald_guy** · 07-08-13, 10:21 PM

We got to hope MIA has one HECK of a good bottom inning. Hopefully this will be a monkey see, monkey do type of thing.

Update:
Well, that one turned to crap. But i'm still ahead for the night, BUT, it all comes down to the final big unit game, as I had a feeling it would. Go Diamondbacks!!!

Update:
O well, can't win them all. Only down 2.6 units. Hopefully we will have better luck next time. Appreciate the picks.

**PAULYPOKER** · 07-09-13, 12:40 AM

Originally posted by No coincidences

BOL fellas. I'm out for the night.

Added one more unit to Oakland.

Originally posted by No coincidences

OAK TT over 3.5 (1.15U to win 1)

Originally posted by No coincidences

Roenicke strikes again in Milwaukee. Pulls Lohse after 93 pitches and opens the floodgates with his shitty bullpen. Guy couldn't manage his way out of a paper bag.

Originally posted by No coincidences

Arizona getting nickel and dimed to death. Dodgers with nine singles already -- most have just been flares.

Not only are you a low life degenerate, you are also a pathological liar......

**EXhoosier10** · 07-09-13, 01:09 AM

Thanks for your input, Pauly

PAULYPOKER
SBR Posting Legend
This message is hidden because PAULYPOKER is on your ignore list.
View Post
Remove user from ignore list

**2daBank** · 07-09-13, 08:34 AM

Originally posted by EXhoosier10

Thanks for your input, Pauly

PAULYPOKER
SBR Posting Legend
This message is hidden because PAULYPOKER is on your ignore list.
View Post
Remove user from ignore list

Sad that it has come to this as I remember a time I enjoyed talking nfl w pauly. Actually had conversations, granted his philosophy was always little to conspiracy nut for my taste (ironically even tho nc will argue, I feel same way bout nc thought process from time to time) but I mean to each as own, I appreciate hearing different approaches everyone takes. Not sure why there isn't more time spent articulating various points of view rather than one pointless moronic post after another? Depressing to think bout someone that comes just to post garbage, whether it be lock of the yr attention ass stupidity or the crap guys like pauly, Gus and 1000 other douchebags around here post that lends absolutely nothing of worth. Reading that crap like being forced to watch jersey shore or something...

rip pauly

PAULYPOKER
SBR Posting Legend
This message is hidden because PAULYPOKER is on your ignore list.
View Post
Remove user from ignore list

**2daBank** · 07-09-13, 08:36 AM

Don't ya gotta bet oak again? I did

**ItsMeMrMattE** · 07-09-13, 08:39 AM

Originally posted by 2daBank

Don't ya gotta bet oak again? I did

Straily at +money here. i like.

**No coincidences** · 07-09-13, 09:16 AM

Originally posted by bald_guy

We got to hope MIA has one HECK of a good bottom inning. Hopefully this will be a monkey see, monkey do type of thing.

Update:
Well, that one turned to crap. But i'm still ahead for the night, BUT, it all comes down to the final big unit game, as I had a feeling it would. Go Diamondbacks!!!

Update:
O well, can't win them all. Only down 2.6 units. Hopefully we will have better luck next time. Appreciate the picks.

Yeah, sorry. The two extra-inning losses really broke the bank. Could've used a split there.

**No coincidences** · 07-09-13, 09:16 AM

Originally posted by 2daBank

Don't ya gotta bet oak again? I did

Yep.

**No coincidences** · 07-09-13, 09:19 AM

Originally posted by 2daBank

Sad that it has come to this as I remember a time I enjoyed talking nfl w pauly. Actually had conversations, granted his philosophy was always little to conspiracy nut for my taste (ironically even tho nc will argue, I feel same way bout nc thought process from time to time) but I mean to each as own, I appreciate hearing different approaches everyone takes. Not sure why there isn't more time spent articulating various points of view rather than one pointless moronic post after another? Depressing to think bout someone that comes just to post garbage, whether it be lock of the yr attention ass stupidity or the crap guys like pauly, Gus and 1000 other douchebags around here post that lends absolutely nothing of worth. Reading that crap like being forced to watch jersey shore or something...

rip pauly

PAULYPOKER
SBR Posting Legend
This message is hidden because PAULYPOKER is on your ignore list.
View Post
Remove user from ignore list

I don't understand it either, but whatever. Why waste your time trolling instead of gambling? Because they don't have any money to gamble. Hell, PP got to the point where he couldn't even bet points he was so broke. I guess when the pockets are lint, this is what happens -- you make up threads like going "all-in" on Boston for Sunday night baseball. Easy to do when "all-in" means a few SBR points.

The board definitely looks a lot cleaner after employing the ignore function.

**No coincidences** · 07-09-13, 09:30 AM

OAK +107 (2U to win 2.14)
TOR +102 (1U to win 1.02)
LAD +107 (1U to win 1.14)

**Big Bear** · 07-09-13, 09:39 AM

Coiner...

can u provide a little reasoning behind the A's selection?

**2daBank** · 07-09-13, 09:39 AM

Originally posted by ItsMeMrMattE

Straily at +money here. i like.

You could pitch for all I care.. Didnt cap that side of it much..all my concern was oak offense vs cole. True oak was at home w dh when the knocked Shelby miller around, easy to draw similarities w the young guys and their tendancy to become fb dependent. Cole honestly hasn't even looked that good to me while miller has had some big time games..of coarse I thought oak would hit Locke so what do I know, lol.. Hopin it one of those times I was just a day early, like chances w second crack at another young pitcher that been kinda fortunate thus far.

**Big Bear** · 07-09-13, 09:44 AM

Originally posted by 2daBank

You could pitch for all I care.. Didnt cap that side of it much..all my concern was oak offense vs cole. True oak was at home w dh when the knocked Shelby miller around, easy to draw similarities w the young guys and their tendancy to become fb dependent. Cole honestly hasn't even looked that good to me while miller has had some big time games..of coarse I thought oak would hit Locke so what do I know, lol.. Hopin it one of those times I was just a day early, like chances w second crack at another young pitcher that been kinda fortunate thus far.

I will agree with that Bank. Cole is a guy who pitches for strike outs and the A's may be able to work his pitch count up early in the game...

But Cole should feel very comfortable pitching at home and he will have the advantage of Straily being an automatic out in the 9 hole.

The Pirates do have a dynamite bullpen though

**whtsox13** · 07-09-13, 09:50 AM

SBR Forum - Sports Betting Talk - Sportsbook Review Forum

http://forum.sbrforum.com/baseball-betting/2424132-its-time-start-seriously-fading-padres.html

Sports betting and handicapping forum: discuss picks, odds, and predictions for upcoming games and results on latest bets.

You haven't followed your own advice, in fact you've been on SD a few times since 6/24. What's up with that?

**Big Bear** · 07-09-13, 10:29 AM

Originally posted by whtsox13

http://forum.sbrforum.com/baseball-b...ng-padres.html

You haven't followed your own advice, in fact you've been on SD a few times since 6/24. What's up with that?

Can u imagine if you had faded the Padres every game during this streak and kept doubling down?

**joco** · 07-09-13, 10:33 AM

taking your own advice is one of the hardest things to do...

**Big Bear** · 07-09-13, 11:21 AM

Originally posted by joco

taking your own advice is one of the hardest things to do...

true.

**leetreaper** · 07-09-13, 11:22 AM

Originally posted by Big Bear

Can u imagine if you had faded the Padres every game during this streak and kept doubling down?

You are fu.cking retarded as hell...

**italianbandit** · 07-09-13, 11:23 AM

Originally posted by whtsox13

http://forum.sbrforum.com/baseball-b...ng-padres.html

You haven't followed your own advice, in fact you've been on SD a few times since 6/24. What's up with that?

Because gambling is not about picking winners and losers, its about getting good odds in your estimated favor. Just because a team is regressing doesn't mean they are not a good bet.

**Big Bear** · 07-09-13, 11:26 AM

Originally posted by italianbandit

Because gambling is not about picking winners and losers, its about getting good odds in your estimated favor. Just because a team is regressing doesn't mean they are not a good bet.

i agree. Especially in football when point spread is involved.

I think sometimes though we over think things.

Sometimes its best just to keep it simple

**joco** · 07-09-13, 11:29 AM

i like all 3 of those plays no coin

**No coincidences** · 07-09-13, 11:44 AM

Originally posted by italianbandit

Because gambling is not about picking winners and losers, its about getting good odds in your estimated favor. Just because a team is regressing doesn't mean they are not a good bet.

Exactly. It's all about the number and the matchup on that given day. Just because I think SD was in for a regression doesn't mean I thought they were going to lose 20 straight games, or that there wouldn't be value on certain days depending on the line.

**No coincidences** · 07-09-13, 11:46 AM

Originally posted by joco

i like all 3 of those plays no coin

Good luck joco. I don't see much else on this card. Might add to at least one of these before all is said and done.

**joco** · 07-09-13, 12:52 PM

thanks u too. im also likin texas and brew crew today. might parlay the rays with someone or take the rl as well

**PAULYPOKER** · 07-09-13, 01:00 PM

If leetreaper is a fan of yours,you know you have hit rock bottom of the degenerate cesspool.......

**Big Bear** · 07-09-13, 01:26 PM

Originally posted by PAULYPOKER

If leetreaper is a fan of yours,you know you have hit rock bottom of the degenerate cesspool.......

Pauly post some winner pal. Stop Trolling

**Sharp_Cheddar** · 07-09-13, 01:33 PM

Originally posted by Big Bear

Pauly post some winner pal. Stop Trolling

Don't even respond to him.

**whtsox13** · 07-09-13, 02:18 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

Exactly. It's all about the number and the matchup on that given day. Just because I think SD was in for a regression doesn't mean I thought they were going to lose 20 straight games, or that there wouldn't be value on certain days depending on the line.

Was an honest question based on the thread title 'Time to start seriously fading the Padres'. You were right about their regression and wagered the other way.

**Louisvillekid1** · 07-09-13, 02:23 PM

Good Luck Coiner, great work this season