2% That is the answer to what question.

[dante1]

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/

When Donald T talks about facts, when he makes a factual statement how often is it 100% correct. The answer is 2% of the time. That is fck ing unbelievable. So when he makes factual comments 98% of the time they are tainted in some manner. And a huge percentage are complete BS. And yet he has millions of supporters what conclusion might one come to about this particular fact? Well, it is difficult to deny it because the source prints the comments that he has made. So one can't say they are left wing liars because the comments in question are right there in black and white. You can check them out for yourself. So the question of the validity--is not really valid.

Well where do we go from here? We know for sure that the donald is either a BS, doesn't know what he is talking about or both. We also know that that particular fact doesn't matter to his millions of followers. That is the only possible conclusion, nothing else remains. So as I have been fond of saying for years...words don't matter to these people. What is said is irrelevant to what the message really is.

So what is the message? The message is hate, division, strife, me vs them, racism, nationalism and all those other great words that divide a people. The irony of this is one of the main complaints from the crazies is that Obama is dividing us. Isn't that something? Donald T has done more in the past few months to divide a nation than any person I can think of since the 60's.

Now he is threatening and promising if he gets screwed on the nomination there will be violence. And I believe he is correct. The R party is screwed in so many ways and it is actual karma. They set the ground work for what is happening now and god bless them.

What an interesting time to be an American. Watching this history unfold in real time is fascinating. I never in my entire life imagined something of this nature could happen here. Maybe, Trump needs to start a third political party. That would a perfect ending in my book. Get all the crazies united in one party, what a fitting end.

BTW, I am still madly behind Mr Trump.

Oh about 75% of the time the statements are mostly false, false or pants on fire false. lol

[brooks85]

lol politifact

dante further embarrassing himself.

[dante1]

lol politifact

dante further embarrassing himself.

Mr Brooks, the quotations made by Mr Trump are printed in black and white. In other words for a low thinker like you, he is quoted word for word. Each quote that he made, that he made personally is printed for the reader to see.

You know I accuse you of never really addressing the issue at hand. I accuse you of replying with a comment that is worthless, untrue, half true, or simply BS. Boy, was I off base on that one. You never do that, do you?

[brooks85]

Mr Brooks, the quotations made by Mr Trump are printed in black and white. In other words for a low thinker like you, he is quoted word for word. Each quote that he made, that he made personally is printed for the reader to see.

You know I accuse you of never really addressing the issue at hand. I accuse you of replying with a comment that is worthless, untrue, half true, or simply BS. Boy, was I off base on that one. You never do that, do you?

oh I know, I already found one lie by politico on the top of the article. As usual, they even acknowledge they are wrong in their own ruling. Website is good for a laugh at least. I've truly lost count how many times I've logically shown what garbage that website writes. Kind of stuff I'd get "C" grades for many years ago and rightfully so. And that was in high school... lol

[dante1]

lol politifact

dante further embarrassing himself.

this is a perfect example of why it is virtually impossible to debate or discuss with these guys. they defend with such stupidity that how can you have a reasonable conversation with them? now he is attacking politifact, okay that is fine. but, is he so stupid that he doesn't realize that the quotes are word for word from donald trump. politifact is not reporting anything but his exact quotes, then those quotes are fact checked not by one individual but by dozens probably scores of reporters. now either the quote is true or it isn't true. There is no opinions here, they are fact checked.

and this is the way these guys argue all the time, not some of the time, but every single argument digresses into this type of BS. My question is and it is a real question it is not rhetorical. Are they really this stupid, or is it an act or a combination of stupidity and acting?

[dante1]

oh I know, I already found one lie by politico on the top of the article. As usual, they even acknowledge they are wrong in their own ruling. Website is good for a laugh at least. I've truly lost count how many times I've logically shown what garbage that website writes. Kind of stuff I'd get "C" grades for many years ago and rightfully so. And that was in high school... lol

well that is interesting, when I make comments such as these I always present the proof. so I am assuming very shortly you will post that proof in this exact thread. we will be waiting.

[brooks85]

well that is interesting, when I make comments such as these I always present the proof. so I am assuming very shortly you will post that proof in this exact thread. we will be waiting.

nope, it is 2016. That is like grits the other day asking me to prove how Obama was a terrible president. Don't count on me wasting more time on something is widely known. Same goes for politifact, it isn't 2008 anymore. Only an ignorant(nice way to put it) person would make a thread about politifact these days...

[dante1]

nope, it is 2016. That is like grits the other day asking me to prove how Obama was a terrible president. Don't count on me wasting more time on something is widely known. Same goes for politifact, it isn't 2008 anymore. Only an ignorant(nice way to put it) person would make a thread about politifact these days...

just as i figured, you know I believe it might be possible that you would beat that 2% DT figure. it is shameful how you and others just outright lie, not even bs, outright lies. credibility mr brooks you should look that word up, then you should memorize it and hold it dear to your heart. it is all we have mr brooks our credibility and our word. you sir are lacking.

[brooks85]

just as i figured, you know I believe it might be possible that you would beat that 2% DT figure. it is shameful how you and others just outright lie, not even bs, outright lies. credibility mr brooks you should look that word up, then you should memorize it and hold it dear to your heart. it is all we have mr brooks our credibility and our word. you sir are lacking.

yeah, me too. You'll stay ignorant as hell either way while people who can use google can laugh at politico with me.

[d2bets]

His theory is to throw so much bullshit at the wall that it's impossible to keep up or to focus on any one chunk of bullshit. So far it seems to be working perfectly. brooksy has adopted the strategy.

[brooks85]

^lol following me around threads now. Poor d2bets. Are the logical beat downs finally taking their toll? Today was especially rough for you. Starting with your inability to understand what the world "help" means and now you're bringing up the fact you don't know how to handicap or how to understand the different contexts of the word "favorite." Explains why you get so many predictions wrong tho!

[DwightShrute]

dante1's statements by ruling

• True ----------------------------------------------------like winning the powerball (0.00000000000001%)

• Mostly true -------------------------------------------------------------------as rare as a solar eclipse (0.05%)

• Half truth ------------------------------------------------you'd have better luck hitting a hole in one (1%)

• Mostly False -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------mostly always (2%)

• False ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------is water wet? (6%)

• Pants on Fire ------------------------------------------------as sure as the sun comes up tomorrow (90%)

our ruling:

[IMG]https://****************************/hphotos-xaf1/v/t1.0-9/10456424_10207693650915915_1838620412521 808894_n.jpg?oh=2ef12d6a136f971952129035 d82adc5a&oe=5786F00F[/IMG]

[rkelly110]

If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, bullshit.

If Politifact praised Trump, you can bet the boys in here would be having that web site in every post. Like
Breitbart and info wars (same difference).

[d2bets]

^lol following me around threads now. Poor d2bets. Are the logical beat downs finally taking their toll? Today was especially rough for you. Starting with your inability to understand what the world "help" means and now you're bringing up the fact you don't know how to handicap or how to understand the different contexts of the word "favorite." Explains why you get so many predictions wrong tho!

Petition to Spread Bullshit of Record -- Exhibit A.

[DwightShrute]

If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, bullshit.

If Politifact praised Trump, you can bet the boys in here would be having that web site in every post. Like
Breitbart and info wars (same difference).

Politifact claims to be unbiased. They obviously are not. Are they always wrong? no.

It's like someone asking Lance Armstrong advice about fair play or what 2 balls feels like. You might be skeptical about his answer and more likely than not, you shouldn't repeat it.

[dante1]

Politifact claims to be unbiased. They obviously are not. Are they always wrong? no.

It's like someone asking Lance Armstrong advice about fair play or what 2 balls feels like. You might be skeptical about his answer and more likely than not, you shouldn't repeat it.

kelly you are correct more bs

[dante1]

http://www.factcheck.org/2016/03/factchecking-the-11th-gop-debate/

another fact checking organization that claims just about the same about our friend D Trump.

I wonder if brooks and dwightie, both play loose with the truth, have something to say about Annenberg.
Lol, both will neither have a clue who or what Annenberg is or represents. This might be fun, they might have an opinion on this. I can't wait.

[dante1]

you know it is so obvious that Trump is a liar and doesn't even prepare for these debates. I mean how stupid must you be to disagree with that. his comments are not even close to the truth. he blames the fed about common core and the fed has almost nothing to do with common core. did he check that out. nope, he got caught and attempted to weasel his way out. that is just one example.

how about the bs with the muslims celebrating. the list is endless and these guys defend him. it is hilarious. 2% fellows and going down.

okay dwightie and brooks waiting for your comments about Annenberg? Go ahead!

[BigOrange]

I know the answer Dante.

2% of Libtards have a slight fukking clue about what is going on around them.

What did I win for the right answer?

[dante1]

I know the answer Dante.

2% of Libtards have a slight fukking clue about what is going on around them.

What did I win for the right answer?

you win the right to vote for D Trump and have a chance to be crowned king of the crazies. but remember this you are right now tied with millions. good luck!

[dante1]

http://www.factcheck.org/2016/03/factchecking-the-11th-gop-debate/

here is another one, geez all these fact checkers picking on D Trump. how about this one Dwightie and Brooks. what about this one?

[DwightShrute]

POLITIFACT

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=politifact+bias

It's one thing not knowing a source is biased but it's another thing knowing they are and still pretending they aren't.

[dante1]

POLITIFACT

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=politifact+bias

It's one thing not knowing a source is biased but it's another thing knowing they are and still pretending they aren't.

well dwightie it might be nice if you illustrated some proof, you know real facts. cartoons and soccer balls don't cut it, like kelly says that is simply bs. you guys don't deal with facts you deal with bs. for once, just once prove your allegations. you can't so out come the toys. don't you realize how stupid and childish your arguments are. I mean when people who haven't a dog in the fight call it bs doesn't that tell you something?

the irony of it is Dwightie and Brooks talking about lying. Now that is irony.

and what is your opinion about the Annenberg article, I know you didn't even read it. you will say you did but we all know how that works don't we.

[DwightShrute]

[IMG]https://****************************/hphotos-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/11215066_10153995191883610_1842856948841 448690_n.jpg?oh=b0030480239d6a5423b33f5a 7d686fd6&oe=5759649F[/IMG]

[rkelly110]

As my ex father in law who just past, who was exactly like Trump, a huge bullshitter, once said, it will all come out
in the wash.

When Hillary puts him in the washing machine a few times, his bullshit will wash out.

[dante1]

[IMG]https://****************************/hphotos-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/11215066_10153995191883610_1842856948841 448690_n.jpg?oh=b0030480239d6a5423b33f5a 7d686fd6&oe=5759649F[/IMG]

I asked for some proof and dwightie presented it. this is his version of truth. it is embarrassing, truly I am embarrassed for Dwightie.Both he and his twin are absolutely incapable of defending a position with facts, logic and a reasonable narrative. So they produce cartoons and the above. I am embarrassed for them but they are not, very difficult to embarrass lads without a clue.

Poor Dwightie, you would think after this many years you would get a clue. Hey, what about your opinion on Annenberg. I knew you wouldn't reach into that wasps nest. You haven't one clue about them, well you could have researched but you knew that would be dangerous too. So you stayed away--smart. lol

[DwightShrute]

As my ex father in law who just past, who was exactly like Trump, a huge bullshitter, once said, it will all come out
in the wash.

When Hillary puts him in the washing machine a few times, his bullshit will wash out.

Thankfully for you, Hillary is like Mother Teresa.

[dante1]

As my ex father in law who just past, who was exactly like Trump, a huge bullshitter, once said, it will all come out
in the wash.

When Hillary puts him in the washing machine a few times, his bullshit will wash out.

Kelly, you are correct. If he gets the nomination she will destroy him in the debates. What is he going to say, I got a bigger dick than you. And you know because of his hubris he won't prepare, he simply won't. She will have all the facts, she will be prepared, she will confuse him and kill him. I mean that won't mean anything to his people because...words mean nothing to them. But, I hope he gets that nomination.

You know he might just not even go to the debates just read he refused to go to one.

[DwightShrute]

I asked for some proof and dwightie presented it. this is his version of truth. it is embarrassing, truly I am embarrassed for Dwightie.Both he and his twin are absolutely incapable of defending a position with facts, logic and a reasonable narrative. So they produce cartoons and the above. I am embarrassed for them but they are not, very difficult to embarrass lads without a clue.

Poor Dwightie, you would think after this many years you would get a clue. Hey, what about your opinion on Annenberg. I knew you wouldn't reach into that wasps nest. You haven't one clue about them, well you could have researched but you knew that would be dangerous too. So you stayed away--smart. lol

[dante1]

Thankfully for you, Hillary is like Mother Teresa.

oh no she is a flawed candidate. but Trump is so much worse. what is his unfavorable right now. Close to 60? Not sure, I thought I read it is over 60% with women. I don't have numbers, maybe I am wrong.

[dante1]

some more facts and a logical narrative from our friend Dwighite, how can you debate this guy? He buries you with facts and logic, every single time.

[DwightShrute]

[IMG]https://****************************/hphotos-xpa1/v/t1.0-9/3648_1020224201364627_320319558665424420 4_n.png?oh=ff0fd86dc011abe711a2553ec3205 57f&oe=57867C7D[/IMG]

[rkelly110]

Chick with a dick, or a man with . A disgrace anyway you look at IT!

[dante1]

and again, as I said he cannot be embarrassed. but give him credit, not very bright, not educated, not honest but he has animal smarts he knows he had better stay away from the Annenberg question. he knows his limitations and almost never returns an answer to any question. his reptilian instinct takes over and smells trouble. lol good job dwightie. you are as dumb as a rock, uneducated and dishonest but you know when to retreat.

okay my friend you may have the rest of the cartoons and pastes. knock yourself out.

[DwightShrute]