Seeing Davydenko win Doha last week gave me an idea.You have to forgive me,Im a alternative think outside the box kind of gambler,so Im always tinkering looking for an edge on anything.Just so happens Im doing it in tennis right now.
How about seeing how all Ranked players do in an underdog system?
Meaning..... play on all ranked players in each tourney that are +100 or better.Also Im sure there are ranked players that play other players that are UNRANKED that also are + money.
Im sure yes the reason they would be underdogs would be for a reason that the books know,but the books cant be always right?
So through Brisbane,Doha,and Chennai..
The record would be 5-10...-6.06 units YTD..assuming 1 unit per bet..
Record of Seeded underdogs vs unseeded would 0-1..-1 unit...
How about seeing how all Ranked players do in an underdog system?
Meaning..... play on all ranked players in each tourney that are +100 or better.Also Im sure there are ranked players that play other players that are UNRANKED that also are + money.
Im sure yes the reason they would be underdogs would be for a reason that the books know,but the books cant be always right?
So through Brisbane,Doha,and Chennai..
The record would be 5-10...-6.06 units YTD..assuming 1 unit per bet..
Record of Seeded underdogs vs unseeded would 0-1..-1 unit...