any play on young v ward? over looks like cake brotha
Comment
matt1216
SBR Posting Legend
10-27-11
14683
#1298
Originally posted by professionalAD
any play on young v ward? over looks like cake brotha
No, it's over bro. Murray won. British wins 3-1 series
Comment
matt1216
SBR Posting Legend
10-27-11
14683
#1299
Challenger Play West Lake Adelaide 2nd Feb 2014 adding:
Eames ML 2.30 x 3 units
GL
Comment
HatersGonnaHate
SBR Wise Guy
09-10-12
876
#1300
Do you ever pick favorites in challengers?? Seems like every challenger picks is a dog. I just don't think Eames has enough to win tonight.
Comment
Hardcoar
SBR Posting Legend
02-17-13
15606
#1301
He just picked a dog.
Comment
Spinny
SBR High Roller
01-28-14
165
#1302
I was looking at this match to… Any reason behind picking Eames Matt?
Comment
fitguy67
SBR Hall of Famer
03-13-11
5082
#1303
Originally posted by HatersGonnaHate
Do you ever pick favorites in challengers?? Seems like every challenger picks is a dog. I just don't think Eames has enough to win tonight.
betting on something at a price of 2.30 does NOT mean you think it's absolutely "likely" to happen (ie. has a probability of 50% or greater)...
on the contrary all it requires is that you think it is more likely to happen than the probability implied by those odds, in this case just 43.48% = 1/2.30
___
so you're right, Eames very likely/very probably does not have what it takes to win tonight (versus the absolute 50% benchmark)...
but that doesn't mean it isn't a good bet...because any probability or likelihood that exceeds the relative 43.48% benchmark buried in the price means it (and all plays driven by the same logic) is $ long-term...as the $-gains of the occasional surprise wins more than offset the more frequent (and smaller) $-losses
Comment
matt1216
SBR Posting Legend
10-27-11
14683
#1304
Originally posted by fitguy67
betting on something at a price of 2.30 does NOT mean you think it's absolutely "likely" to happen (ie. has a probability of 50% or greater)...
on the contrary all it requires is that you think it is more likely to happen than the probability implied by those odds, in this case just 43.48% = 1/2.30
___
so you're right, Eames very likely/very probably does not have what it takes to win tonight (versus the absolute 50% benchmark)...
but that doesn't mean it isn't a good bet...because any probability or likelihood that exceeds the relative 43.48% benchmark buried in the price means it (and all plays driven by the same logic) is $ long-term...as the $-gains of the occasional surprise wins more than offset the more frequent (and smaller) $-losses
thanks fitguy, I hate trying to explain this stuff. This will win slightly more than it loses. I've seen the trend.
Comment
fitguy67
SBR Hall of Famer
03-13-11
5082
#1305
i want some saville,2-0 @ 2.00...but b365 took it down...
Comment
Spinny
SBR High Roller
01-28-14
165
#1306
Same so I just went ML on Luke
Comment
matt1216
SBR Posting Legend
10-27-11
14683
#1307
Challenger Play 2nd Feb 2014 adding:
sekiguchi Ml 2.80 x 1 unit
*why not. This guy has lost 9 of his last 10. He's lost both his matches vs Saville. He should be 3.50 atleast. I smell fish here, but I could be way off.
GL
Comment
stepanekslips
SBR Sharp
10-18-13
462
#1308
Originally posted by matt1216
Challenger Play 2nd Feb 2014 adding:
sekiguchi Ml 2.80 x 1 unit
*why not. This guy has lost 9 of his last 10. He's lost both his matches vs Saville. He should be 3.50 atleast. I smell fish here, but I could be way off.
GL
Respect. Whats your losses/profits?
Comment
Jago2008
SBR MVP
05-18-11
3047
#1309
Congratulations to Seattle
I'm so happy I discussed live-betting this game and not my initial lean.
I'm jealous being a Chargers fan, you guys get your 1st NFL championship but it's no surprise what an amazing defensive effort. Seattle had a safety, special teams return TD, defensive TD, rush TD, Pass TD, and FG. Engage.
GL on your tennis bets.
Comment
fitguy67
SBR Hall of Famer
03-13-11
5082
#1310
Originally posted by matt1216
Challenger Play 2nd Feb 2014 adding:
sekiguchi Ml 2.80 x 1 unit
*why not. This guy has lost 9 of his last 10. He's lost both his matches vs Saville. He should be 3.50 atleast. I smell fish here, but I could be way off.
GL
i just joined u @10.00 in-play...half unit on the SLF (smell like fish) lottery to win 4.5
Comment
fitguy67
SBR Hall of Famer
03-13-11
5082
#1311
Originally posted by stepanekslips
Respect. Whats your losses/profits?
go back two pages, post #1253 for most recent thread-to-date figures
matt's very good over the long haul but streaky over the short, so you gotta fire reasonably-sized bullets...same as with any good capper, come to think of it...
no way around it...sports-betting is streaky for everybody..but only a handful can do it profitably...Matt, Hardcoar, and EP36 are three who can
Comment
stepanekslips
SBR Sharp
10-18-13
462
#1312
Originally posted by fitguy67
i just joined u @10.00 in-play...half unit on the SLF (smell like fish) lottery to win 4.5
Which book?
Comment
Spinny
SBR High Roller
01-28-14
165
#1313
Blown out to 15.0 on my book but I still wouldn't touch it tbh Luke is already up a break in second
Comment
fitguy67
SBR Hall of Famer
03-13-11
5082
#1314
bet365
Comment
stepanekslips
SBR Sharp
10-18-13
462
#1315
Gucci Mane breaks for the first time? Hope springs mang.
Comment
fitguy67
SBR Hall of Famer
03-13-11
5082
#1316
Spinny, this bet is not on "Challenger Tennis as Sport"...but rather on "Challenger Tennis as Choreography"...
a little sportbook-assisted income-padding for these poor schlepps that we might be able to benefit from...
hmmm...the plot thickens a bit as Sekiguchi breaks back to tie the set
update: didn't follow the script to the happy ending...doh!
Comment
Spinny
SBR High Roller
01-28-14
165
#1317
Yeah I understand. I'm aware these matches can turn randomly, I guess I just saw it as dead money in this match but I'm biased because I use to play tennis with Luke
Comment
matt1216
SBR Posting Legend
10-27-11
14683
#1318
Challenger Play Chennai Qualifier 2nd Feb 2014 adding:
R. Becker ML 1.87 x 3 units
Comment
alpinepetey
SBR Wise Guy
11-01-12
844
#1319
Originally posted by matt1216
Challenger Play 2nd Feb 2014 adding:
Becker ML 1.87 x 3 units
Is this Benjamin Becker?
Comment
matt1216
SBR Posting Legend
10-27-11
14683
#1320
Originally posted by alpinepetey
Is this Benjamin Becker?
No, it's richard becker
Comment
Spinny
SBR High Roller
01-28-14
165
#1321
No it's Richard Becker
Comment
alpinepetey
SBR Wise Guy
11-01-12
844
#1322
Thanks Matt and Spinny
Comment
matt1216
SBR Posting Legend
10-27-11
14683
#1323
holly fck!! First it's Odesnik that fcks me set 1. Now becker up 5-3 losses 7-5 wtf is going on
Comment
matt1216
SBR Posting Legend
10-27-11
14683
#1324
Challenger Plays 3rd Feb 2013:
Millot/Texiera 2.20 x 2 units
*Kenz play(Texiera)
GL
Comment
rankslash
SBR MVP
07-29-13
1562
#1325
Originally posted by matt1216
holly fck!! First it's Odesnik that fcks me set 1. Now becker up 5-3 losses 7-5 wtf is going on
hm Odesnik won first set?
Comment
Hardcoar
SBR Posting Legend
02-17-13
15606
#1326
No. That was the point.
He was serving for the set and lost four straight games. Then I went to bed and woke up to some cash.
Comment
roger nadal
SBR Rookie
02-02-14
18
#1327
i had odesnik over Wang yesterday night!!!nice win!!!
Comment
roger nadal
SBR Rookie
02-02-14
18
#1328
but i had Errani to win also!!! bad lost!!
Comment
addictedto
SBR MVP
07-03-08
1935
#1329
Originally posted by matt1216
Challenger Plays 3rd Feb 2013:
Millot/Texiera 2.20 x 2 units
*Kenz play(Texiera)
GL
I took same thing, but Milot 2-0 so the double is @2.70. All now on Teix