Thinking about adding a new rule on the SBR forum

[rjt721]

Is this BBD's way of saying he wants Panic gone?

[VegasDave]

I will enter all the known drunk posters and enter them in the SBR database. Then once those posters start verbally abusing others and or mention that they have been drinking. Then one of us mods will put he/she in the drunk tank for the rest of the evening sir.

Verbally abusing people, fine.

Mention they have been drinking? They are adults BBD, we all have a right to drink, this seems awfully big brother to me.

Just my two cents, I never get drunk and dislike drunken bullshit and I am still defending their rights.

[bigboydan]

True enough, BBD. But does that not happen even during the day when all posters are sober?

It most certainly does. We have posters from all around the world and somewhere out there it's always "happy hour". So with that being said, I feel this rule would be most beneficial to get passed.

[purecarnagge]

no we choose to post here, we choose to be here, we choose to read the threads on this site. We need to have accountability. Just bring the hammer BBD...show them whats up

[Panic]

Is this BBD's way of saying he wants Panic gone?

Could be.

[bigboydan]

Verbally abusing people, fine.

Mention they have been drinking? They are adults BBD, we all have a right to drink, this seems awfully big brother to me.

Just my two cents, I never get drunk and dislike drunken bullshit and I am still defending their rights.

No verbal abuse is not fine sir (read the Faq's page). Now in regards to your "They are adults" comment. Not all the SBR posters are old enough to drink at all. For example, Fonzie's cousin (aka AAO) and Pat Venditto are both have admitted to be under age, and in some cases under the influence while being under age, which is much worse. Now with that being said I feel that could open up the company I work for to legal liabilities.

[bigboydan]

Could be.

I'm not wanting you to leave at all sir. I just want you to honor the new rules that might be invoked in the near future is all.

[Panic]

I'm not wanting you to leave at all sir. I just want you to honor the new rules that might be invoked in the near future is all.

Okay. Whats the new rules?

[rjt721]

I say we get rid of all mods named "bigboydan".

Anyone else in favor?

[bigboydan]

No posting while being under the influence sir.

[bigboydan]

I say we get rid of all mods named "bigboydan".

Anyone else in favor?

RJT, I'm trying to get this new rule voted in for your own good. I don't want to see upstanding posters like yourself abused by intoxicated members of the SBR forum.

[Panic]

No posting while being under the influence sir.

lol. Is that the new rules, BBD?

[bigboydan]

Is that the new rules, BBD?

If it gets enough votes it will be presented to management for approval sir.

[rjt721]

BBD, 40,000 of your 42,000+ posts have come while you've been liquored up. You don't fool me... you're just trying to give yourself an excuse for working less around here by blaming the booze. I see right through this.

[Panic]

If it gets enough votes it will be presented to management for approval sir.

I hope it passes.

[bigboydan]

no we choose to post here, we choose to be here, we choose to read the threads on this site. We need to have accountability. Just bring the hammer BBD...show them whats up

I understand what you are saying sir, however this rule will only help us moderators to do our jobs more effectively if it passes.

[bigboydan]

I hope it passes.

It's not looking good for it passing at the moment sir. The "No" votes are really tallying up at a high rate at the moment.

[Panic]

It's not looking good for it passing at the moment sir. The "No" votes are really tallying up at a high rate at the moment.

I hope it passes.

[MonkeyF0cker]

I will enter all the known drunk posters and enter them in the SBR database. Then once those posters start verbally abusing others and or mention that they have been drinking. Then one of us mods will put he/she in the drunk tank for the rest of the evening sir.

Have you considered the loopholes upon implementing said disciplinary system? Does it not indeed promote the use of ghosts in times of inebriation or simply the witholding of publicizing personal intoxication levels to the SBR community?

[bigboydan]

Have you considered the loopholes upon implementing said disciplinary system? Does it not indeed promote the use of ghosts in times of inebriation or simply the witholding of publicizing personal intoxication levels to the SBR community?

That would be something the moderators would have to discuss with management if this new rule passes.

[MonkeyF0cker]

It may be rather difficult to garner a representative vote without the full disclosure of the explicit details and ramifications finalized in the measure...

[mathdotcom]

How are you gonna administer the breathalizer?

???

[bigboydan]

This would have to be discussed with management to before determining the new rules that involved PWI gentlemen. The main focus is to get this motion passed and worry about the rules afterwords. I feel it would be of a great help to the SBR community if we work together and get this vote passed.

[MonkeyF0cker]

How are we to know that another UIGEA or other such pork will not be attached to this resolution?

[bigboydan]

How are we to know that another UIGEA or other such pork will not be attached to this resolution?

This is nothing like UIGEA at all sir. This new rule will only help not hurt the SBR community.

[MonkeyF0cker]

No. But it is similar to the Port Security Act, which the UIGEA was so unceremoniously attached to. I may be smelling a rat here.

[tmoney]

your making the right decision dan drunks should be locked up not posting

[bigboydan]

No. But it is similar to the Port Security Act, which the UIGEA was so unceremoniously attached to. I may be smelling a rat here.

I can assume you sir that there are no motives behind this new rule proposal. I just feel it's time to add this type of rule in the facts page in order to help better provide a safer SBR community. I hope you will join me on this issue with your support.

[VegasDave]

No verbal abuse is not fine sir (read the Faq's page). Now in regards to your "They are adults" comment. Not all the SBR posters are old enough to drink at all. For example, Fonzie's cousin (aka AAO) and Pat Venditto are both have admitted to be under age, and in some cases under the influence while being under age, which is much worse. Now with that being said I feel that could open up the company I work for to legal liabilities.

You misunderstood; I meant verbal abuse, fine, boot them. I did NOT mean verbal abuse is okay.

Legal liabilities? Every single day hundreds of people post that they are gambling overseas illegally in the United States. SBR has contests encouraging us to sign up with offshore books despite the fact that this is illegal in the USA. I highly doubt a few young people drinking is a legal liability you have to worry about.

[bigboydan]

I highly doubt a few young people drinking is a legal liability you have to worry about.

It is though sir. Since they are under age and drinking it puts SBR at a much greater legal risk, because the youngsters parents could be very litigious.

[tmoney]

your right dan.u shouldnt contribute to this immorality

[MonkeyF0cker]

I would like to propose an alternate resolution that would require intoxication of controlled substances by any and all posters of the SBR community.

[bigboydan]

That is not a practical solution sir.

[MonkeyF0cker]

Then we've failed as a society I'm afraid, BBD...

[bigboydan]

Then we've failed as a society I'm afraid, BBD...

We might have failed with the outside society, however there still is hope in the SBR community. So please vote yes to prevent this from happening here sir.