Are We All Chasing Detroit And Verlander Today???

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Nick Papageorgio
    SBR MVP
    • 01-07-12
    • 2396

    #176
    It's threads like this that people make a living off of.
    Comment
    • Gee
      SBR MVP
      • 04-08-10
      • 4547

      #177
      Originally posted by BuddyBear
      The point is you made a blanked statement about -165 being a bad number to gamble on. I said it makes no sense because it simply is not true. What would be the point of handicapping games if you went by rules like you've suggested?

      I realize that if you bet more favs you have to win at a higher rate but the betting price reflects a probability. If they play a 1000 times, DET would have to win at approximate >62% of the time to be a profitable bet. But they only play one game and that's where handicapping comes in. It's not like Verlander should have been +200 today. Just handicap the games and make your own lines and see where it falls.

      No sense in arguing it more.
      No point arguing with an idiot pal. I've given up.

      Guy thinks he knows everything, but is actually one of the more clueless gamblers on here.
      Comment
      • ThaTopMoron
        BARRELED IN @ SBR!
        • 04-30-10
        • 27020

        #178
        I laid off Detroit because they blew it the night before... they r fukkn losers right now
        Comment
        SBR Contests
        Collapse
        Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
        Collapse
        Working...