Have you seen any of LA's game this season? Richards is a fukking ghost, pal. Even more useless than the ghosts on SBR.
Tell me more about Richards pal.
Comment
Sunde91
SBR Hall of Famer
11-26-09
8325
#185
playoff hockey is the most intense to have a bet on
love seeing cuntnucks mauled
Comment
DwightShrute
SBR Aristocracy
01-17-09
103270
#186
Kings only woke up the Canucks
No chance LA wins game 2
Comment
William Walters
SBR Hall of Famer
01-17-11
6372
#187
Originally posted by superjeff24
Nobody said it would be a sweep, but that 3rd goal was pure luck.
Not only is Penner the laziest and worst forward in the league, he got the puck put on his stick for him undefended on a nice pass.
Nice pass, **** Penner.
.....and here come the excuses
Comment
CrazyCarl
SBR MVP
10-09-11
1437
#188
All-in on Nucks.
Comment
ThaTopMoron
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
04-30-10
27020
#189
so i don't bet NHL but in very select situations... free money on Canucks in game 2? if it loses... no more hockey bets
i did this last year, only game i bet on was game 7 of NHL Finals, and i was greedy and bet the road dog also because lots of people said Van was weak and would fold under pressure... they sure did too
Comment
DwightShrute
SBR Aristocracy
01-17-09
103270
#190
Originally posted by CrazyCarl
All-in on Nucks.
Comment
leeloo
SBR Sharp
04-11-10
314
#191
Originally posted by lakerboy
4-2 kings will win.
nice call.
any idea on game 2 score ?
Comment
Sawyer
SBR Hall of Famer
06-01-09
7761
#192
Kings 4-2, Oh Yeah!
Comment
DennisGreen
SBR Posting Legend
11-27-08
18369
#193
Kings deserved to win this game no doubt about it. The Canucks handed it to them with all their stupid penalties. Quick was a non-factor as I've been saying this series isn't gonna come down to goaltending. Luongo kept the Canucks close when they shouldn't have even been in it. Congrats Kings fans you deserved this one.
Comment
odog11
SBR MVP
02-14-11
3874
#194
Originally posted by leeloo
nice call.
any idea on game 2 score ?
. He's a capper, not the amazing creskin, give the man his due and a little time for the love a ma'.
Comment
Duff85
SBR MVP
06-15-10
2920
#195
and lakerboy i'd be on the lookout for this guy:
Comment
riffraff24
SBR Hall of Famer
04-20-11
7234
#196
Originally posted by lunchbawks
ottawa will score more 1st round goals than LA, thats for sure
Hate on LA much? Hated on the Dodgers and the Kings and both fukked you real good pal. keep it up
Comment
Pride
SBR MVP
04-12-10
4238
#197
lakerboy doesnt know anything about hockey. wont be long till he starts with his air bets
Comment
RubberKettle
SBR Hall of Famer
12-28-09
6421
#198
LAK will not score enough in this series.
Comment
RubberKettle
SBR Hall of Famer
12-28-09
6421
#199
Nucks fan terrified
Comment
bruceBRUCEbruce
SBR MVP
06-20-09
2560
#200
Originally posted by keyboarding
Have you seen any of LA's game this season? Richards is a fukking ghost, pal. Even more useless than the ghosts on SBR.
this guy is a total meatball.
Comment
spippen
SBR MVP
03-17-09
3874
#201
Originally posted by robzilla
stop smoking crack. The Canucks dominate at home. Luango is playing the best he's ever played. Canucks sweep.
Canucks are trash. I am going to go out on a limb here and state that the Canucks are so soft in battle situation that they won't win one game in this series. 8th seed Kings to sweep. The Canucks are just WAYYYYY to soft.......period.
Comment
thetrinity
SBR Posting Legend
01-25-11
22430
#202
good call last night laker, had the kings for a value play myself.
Comment
superjeff24
SBR MVP
03-17-10
1078
#203
Originally posted by William Walters
.....and here come the excuses
if you watched the game, you'd know that he was singled out by the commentators earlier in the game for not buying into the LA Kings style of play. Believe me, as an Oilers fan we were INCREDIBLY grateful to get rid of that plug.
No excuses, I'm saying the skate pass was legit, but Penner ******* sucks balls (6'4 265 and only got 17 points in 65 games this year) He's has his worst year by far and hes only 30.
All I'm saying is, I'd pound Canucks -300 for the series today. The Kings aint shit.
Comment
Types
SBR Wise Guy
01-22-10
520
#204
Good thing Penner is a UFA next year
Comment
lakerboy
SBR Aristocracy
04-02-09
94379
#205
Originally posted by superjeff24
if you watched the game, you'd know that he was singled out by the commentators earlier in the game for not buying into the LA Kings style of play. Believe me, as an Oilers fan we were INCREDIBLY grateful to get rid of that plug.
No excuses, I'm saying the skate pass was legit, but Penner ******* sucks balls (6'4 265 and only got 17 points in 65 games this year) He's has his worst year by far and hes only 30.
All I'm saying is, I'd pound Canucks -300 for the series today. The Kings aint shit.
Canucks are +100 for the series- pound away.
Comment
keyboarding
SBR Hall of Famer
07-30-09
6817
#206
Originally posted by William Walters
Tell me more about Richards pal.
Mike Richards 1 (power play) (Assists: Anze Kopitar 1, Drew Doughty 1) Dustin Penner 1 (Assists: Jeff Carter 1, Mike Richards 1) Dustin Brown 1 (empty net) (Assists: Mike Richards 2, Jeff Carter 2)
Are you really going to consider points on a 5 on 3 and an empty net as legitimate? I won't say the Penner goal was a fluke/bad bounce because that's hockey, but I don't really see Richards doing anything impressive last night. But I guess LA fans will cling to anything for hope.
Well, the good news is all LA needs VAN to do every game is to take 6 penalties, give up multiple 5 on 3 advantages, get at least one major penalty and average around 7 shots for the first two period and LA can squeeze out 1 goal wins. Must have been a heck of a scouting report LA did.
Clearly LA is a lock, boys.
Comment
William Walters
SBR Hall of Famer
01-17-11
6372
#207
Originally posted by superjeff24
All I'm saying is, I'd pound Canucks -300 for the series today. The Kings aint shit.
Canucks at -300 huh? I'll take the Kings at +270 for the max please. Unfortunately, you're point broke (figures).
Speaking of "shit".........
.......
Comment
William Walters
SBR Hall of Famer
01-17-11
6372
#208
Originally posted by keyboarding
Mike Richards 1 (power play) (Assists: Anze Kopitar 1, Drew Doughty 1) Dustin Penner 1 (Assists: Jeff Carter 1, Mike Richards 1) Dustin Brown 1 (empty net) (Assists: Mike Richards 2, Jeff Carter 2)
Are you really going to consider points on a 5 on 3 and an empty net as legitimate? I won't say the Penner goal was a fluke/bad bounce because that's hockey, but I don't really see Richards doing anything impressive last night. But I guess LA fans will cling to anything for hope.
Well, the good news is all LA needs VAN to do every game is to take 6 penalties, give up multiple 5 on 3 advantages, get at least one major penalty and average around 7 shots for the first two period and LA can squeeze out 1 goal wins. Must have been a heck of a scouting report LA did.
Clearly LA is a lock, boys.
Fukk me............I just assumed that goals were goals and assists were assists.
BTW.......Kings won by two goals sport. Yes, even empty netters count.
By no means do I think "LA is a lock". I do, however, believe they have a good shot at winning this series because the Canucks are soft.
Comment
keyboarding
SBR Hall of Famer
07-30-09
6817
#209
Originally posted by William Walters
Fukk me............I just assumed that goals were goals and assists were assists.
BTW.......Kings won by two goals sport. Yes, even empty netters count.
By no means do I think "LA is a lock". I do, however, believe they have a good shot at winning this series because the Canucks are soft.
The point of mentioning the context of his points was to show they weren't exactly part of a great individual performance but rather as a part of fortunate circumstances.
LA won by 1 goal with an empty netter. They don't put that in brackets for shits and giggles, pal. Do you even fukking watch hockey? I've never seen you post a play or in the NHL subforum.
Give me VAN +100 for 1000 points. What do you say?
Comment
William Walters
SBR Hall of Famer
01-17-11
6372
#210
Originally posted by keyboarding
The point of mentioning the context of his points was to show they weren't exactly part of a great individual performance but rather as a part of fortunate circumstances.
LA won by 1 goal with an empty netter. They don't put that in brackets for shits and giggles, pal. Do you even fukking watch hockey? I've never seen you post a play or in the NHL subforum.
Give me VAN +100 for 1000 points. What do you say?
I never said Richards had a "great" performance.......I was merely pointing out that he was far from a "ghost" last night.
Pretty sure that reads 4-2 GAME 1: ROGERS ARENALAK LEADS SERIES 1 - 0 ›
HIGHLIGHTS ›PHOTOS ›
Los Angeles
1
1
2
4
Vancouver
1
1
0
2
Why would I give you +100 odds when I've already got the Kings at +180? Again, IMO, I think the Kings have a good shot to win this series. Would I be shocked if they lost it 4 games to 2? Nope.