Will you vote Barack Obama again???

[King Mayan]

Hell no, he's already the worst POTUS ever, the man is so clueless is almost laughable. President Pookie needs to stick with community organizing.

says the supposed cop with a marine emblem that voted for a "daddy buy this" retard from 95(texas governor) thru 08....

[mikeanite]

you got to be kidding. u're letting the Rep take over when they put use in the mess in the first place? whenever you put a Rep in office, they f it up. see history.

[Cap dat 4ss]

Just a bunch of rhetoric and strawman arguments going on in here with very few facts. I did not vote for Obama last time around but will likely vote for him this time unless the GOP gets their shit together. They have shown to be completely ineffective in working with the current administration to accomplish anything.

[rsnnh12]

you got to be kidding. u're letting the Rep take over when they put use in the mess in the first place? whenever you put a Rep in office, they f it up. see history.

How exactly did they get us in this mess?

[golfrulz]

obama. this game is over before it even starts. the reps have no one.

[falconticket]

And the Chicago Annenberg Challenge was in the 1990s through 2001 thus he was alive at the time. Try again.

I was referring to the Annenberg Public Policy Center, which is alive and strong. And specifically the website Factcheck.org. Anyone with half a brain knows these guys are in the tank for Obama.

[capitalist pig]

Didnt vote for him, and wont vote for him either. But as a Republican, I dont see that we have anyone that will actually be able to compete with him. Lets face it its not a good time to be any polictician, regardless of party, the country isnt happy and the only way to vent is to vote people out of office,JMO.

later

[losturmarbles]

[RonPaul2008]

The likelihood is high that I will not be voting for the nominee of either party.
Same as in every presidential election I have voted in.

[MrExacta]

No I wouldn't.

MrExacta -`

[golfrulz]

The likelihood is high that I will not be voting for the nominee of either party.
Same as in every presidential election I have voted in.

if ya dont vote...ya cant bitch.

[Cap dat 4ss]

if ya dont vote...ya cant bitch.

Could vote independent or green party... Go Nader!

[losturmarbles]

if ya dont vote...ya cant bitch.

No, it's the opposite. If you voted for Bush or Obama, then you got exactly what you voted for. You can't bitch.

[underthe total]

Haven't seen any changes yet.. Economy is still fukking down..

we have a capitalist market wtf does the government have to do with the market?

[QuantumLeap]

factcheck is a liberal website? proof?

last I checked factcheck.org is run by the annenberg foundation whose president was the late leonore annenberg who has contributed heavily towards reagan and mccain.

so how do u figure that its a liberal website? if anything it is a neocon website.

oh I see. U just dont like all the facts that make u guys look lile the liars crools and thieves so u just dismiss credible sites as run by liberals without knowing the facts.

btw the clinton budget was passed long before the neocons swept into office. they basically sat on their asses and repeaped the benefits.

Proof? I showed you one example.

The "facts" you present are slanted. I refuted that with what I posted.

Don't put words into my mouth. I never said anything about neocons. Refute what I said about Republicans making the budget without dreaming up terms I never referred to.

[QuantumLeap]

I was referring to the Annenberg Public Policy Center, which is alive and strong. And specifically the website Factcheck.org. Anyone with half a brain knows these guys are in the tank for Obama.

The only thing the people have that disagree with you and me is outdated information. Then, after they don't provide any current references they resort to namecalling without providing any support for their position.

We're not dealing with people who reason like adults here.

[tenbas]

I am not sure. I probably would vote for him. Don't really know yet.

[Hotdiggity11]

I was referring to the Annenberg Public Policy Center, which is alive and strong. And specifically the website Factcheck.org. Anyone with half a brain knows these guys are in the tank for Obama.

Source?

[Duff85]

I'm surprised Obama is not shorter odds in election betting.

[losturmarbles]

Source?

try factcheck.org

I guess he doesn't know you're one of those idiots that has to be told what to think.

[crustyme]

Proof? I showed you one example.

The "facts" you present are slanted. I refuted that with what I posted.

Don't put words into my mouth. I never said anything about neocons. Refute what I said about Republicans making the budget without dreaming up terms I never referred to.

facts dont have political leanings or biases. so you think a website founded by the ultra conservative annenberg foundation has liberal leanings because facts dont support your party? so you would rather they lie like fox, limbaugh and hannity?

clinton passed the omnibus budget reconciliation act aka deficit reduction act in 1993 without a single republican vote. yet you want the neocons to take credit for it? LOL

[losturmarbles]

facts dont have political leanings or biases. so you think a website founded by the ultra conservative annenberg foundation has liberal leanings because facts dont support your party? so you would rather they lie like fox, limbaugh and hannity?

clinton passed the omnibus budget reconciliation act aka deficit reduction act in 1993 without a single republican vote. yet you want the neocons to take credit for it? LOL

What's a neocon?

[RonPaul2008]

if ya dont vote...ya cant bitch.

I always vote.

In 2008 I wrote in Ron Paul

In 2004 I voted for Michael Badnarak (LP)

In 2000 I voted for Ralph Nader

In 1996 I voted for Harry Browne (LP)

I would never vote for somebody I don't want to see in office.

[Hotdiggity11]

try factcheck.org

I guess he doesn't know you're one of those idiots that has to be told what to think.

So, no actual source. Thanks.

[losturmarbles]

So, no actual source. Thanks.

I just checked. factcheck.org. It's there. You're welcome.

[Hotdiggity11]

I just checked. factcheck.org. It's there. You're welcome.

I checked out the web page. Nothing about "Being in the tank for Obama" was there.

[Turd Ferguson]

The next president will appoint a minimum of one, and possibly three, supreme court justices. This alone is reason not to vote for a con. Whoever the cons run will be in the pocket of the Koch brothers, the US chamber, etc and if elected would appoint more radical right wing activist justices like Roberts and Alito who never have and never will side with an individual over a corporation.

The Citizens United case would then never be revisited, and disaster capitalism would finish what it has started-everything belonging to very few people. Outside their gates, the bread lines will turn into food riots.

Better stock up on canned goods...

[Hotdiggity11]

The next president will appoint a minimum of one, and possibly three, supreme court justices. This alone is reason not to vote for a con. Whoever the cons run will be in the pocket of the Koch brothers, the US chamber, etc and if elected would appoint more radical right wing activist justices like Roberts and Alito who never have and never will side with an individual over a corporation. The Citizens United case would then never be revisited, and disaster capitalism would finish what it has started-everything belonging to very few people. Outside their gates, the bread lines will turn into food riots.

Better stock up on canned goods...

Citizens United was a scary ruling indeed. Unions and corporations now control our elections with pretty much no regulations.

[Turd Ferguson]

Citizens United was a scary ruling indeed. Unions and corporations now control our elections with pretty much no regulations.

Hence the reason why they are trying to get rid of the last of the unions.

[losturmarbles]

I checked out the web page. Nothing about "Being in the tank for Obama" was there.

Oops, I forgot you're unable to originate your own opinions.

I guess you should check snopes to see if factcheck is neutral and without bias. Oh fukk! Who are you then going to check to know whether or not snopes is without bias. ... oh, the perils of being a dumfuk.

[Hotdiggity11]

Oops, I forgot you're unable to originate your own opinions.

I guess you should check snopes to see if factcheck is neutral and without bias. Oh fukk! Who are you then going to check to know whether or not snopes is without bias. ... oh, the perils of being a dumfuk.

Dude, it's ok. You took a position that you didn't have any sort of a source for. No need to be a drama queen to compensate for your failures.

[QuantumLeap]

facts dont have political leanings or biases.

Facts can be presented with political leanings and biases. But you already knew that didn't you?

[losturmarbles]

Dude, it's ok. You took a position that you didn't have any sort of a source for. No need to be a drama queen to compensate for your failures.

What position was that? You're the idiot that wants a "source" for someone's opinion and has to be told what to think by political ideologues.

[crustyme]

nope. facts speak for themselves.

[losturmarbles]

nope. facts speak for themselves.

Fact: Obama is no different than Bush. Both globalist puppets.