I created a model for MLB that is threatening to end the industry.

[louisvillekid]

Hey LK, Is your only reason for crawling out from under your rock again to post here to abuse SBR and troll this poster? That is all you have posted about since returning.

This is not the place that employs posters or censors sponsor book complaints or tolerates trolls that contribute nothing but spending their time playing big man in town abusing others.

Find another hobby here or slither back off again eh?

I call out trash shit when i decide to check back to see what's been going on, and now i'm a TROLL, AND y'all taking offense because i'm calling it out saying it has to be a behind a scenes person. Instead of calling the poster out, y'all keep giving them benefit of the doubt over and over. But god forbid anyone actually call the bullshit out.
And i don't know what the **** you talking about censoring sponsor books.

Ha, y'all don't tolerate "trolls." This place used to be filled with nothing but posters trashing other posters.

[Optional]

I call out trash shit when i decide to check back to see what's been going on, and now i'm a TROLL, AND y'all taking offense because i'm calling it out saying it has to be a behind a scenes person. Instead of calling the poster out, y'all keep giving them benefit of the doubt over and over. But god forbid anyone actually call the bullshit out.
And i don't know what the **** you talking about censoring sponsor books.

Ha, y'all don't tolerate "trolls." This place used to be filled with nothing but posters trashing other posters.

True. And it was much busier that way. But things have changed under new management.

Happy to have people call out wrong records and air betting etc but you appeared to only be here to keep taking shots at SBR and this guy. In place of the last troll run from BeatTheJerk in the same vein.

Anyway, if it is just that you really did not know that SBR is trying to be a bit more professional and more on topic about sport, excuse me for coming back at you so hard.

I would like to see you back around more as you have the knowledge we are trying to encourage more posts with.

[pavyracer]

Not sure how someone (especially new poster) can come at PT and start a thread with that title and not expect to get every bet scrutinized for accuracy. I mean he threatened to end the industry we all rely on for gambling so if he is successful how are we supposed to gamble without sportbooks?

[Optional]

Thread was moved from the Think Tank last week. But yes it is reasonable to push back on the click bait thread title.

[HoleWrecker]

I call out trash shit when i decide to check back to see what's been going on, and now i'm a TROLL, AND y'all taking offense because i'm calling it out saying it has to be a behind a scenes person. Instead of calling the poster out, y'all keep giving them benefit of the doubt over and over. But god forbid anyone actually call the bullshit out.
And i don't know what the **** you talking about censoring sponsor books.

Ha, y'all don't tolerate "trolls." This place used to be filled with nothing but posters trashing other posters.

I think you have it wrong. YOU ARE THE TRASH SHIT.

[19th Hole]

I got this, MJ.

Mr. Wreckers' straight-up record is indeed 41-34-3.
He's made 78 wagers over the past 38 days.

Of those 78 wagers, he bet the favorite 72 times, three times he bet the dog, and the other three wagers were a pick.
77 of the 78 bets were one-unit flat bets, the other was a 2* bet, which, horrors of horrors, failed.

So what we have here is a flat betting serial chalk layer.
Always a winning formula in the world of baseball betting.

The three underdogs that Mr. Wrecker bet had odds of +122, +110, and +105
( I know, pretty ballsy, huh?)
The dogs went 2-1.

Assuming 1* = 100 dollars, he collected 3,900 dollars on the chalk, and picked up another 232 dollars on the two dogs that won (+122, and +110) for a total of 4,132 dollars.

With the juice, his 37 losses cost him 4895 dollars, for a net loss of 763 dollars (-7.63*)

Sixteen of those 37 losses he laid -150 or greater, six of those were losses of -170 or greater, and a -210 loss to boot.

Which goes to show what I've been preaching here for the last fourteen years, there's no quicker burial in sports betting than volume betting baseball chalk, especially when 77 out of 78 bets are 1* flats.

[HoleWrecker]

7-23-2025




Rangers -144 (2 units)
Brewers/Mariners F5 under 4.5 -140
Guardians F5 -140
Padres -148
Mets/Angels F5 over 4.5 -135