NEW Streak for the Cash

[yisman]

Looks bleak for me.

No one getting FGs.

Marshall just scored a TD and it's 14-6, XP coming.

[yisman]

Wow, they reviewed it and the call stood, but ESPN showed a replay where you could see the receiver's foot hitting the pylon before he caught the ball, meaning he basically went out of bounds first.


Should have been overturned and ruled incomplete.

[lordswing]

flippin' celtics/knicks are making me sweat

hooray preseason nba

[lordswing]

celtics are pretty worthless, manage to tie it, then decide to just start bricking 3s

luke and rondo should not be on the 3 pt line,

[lordswing]

probably passing tomorrow, not bothering with the golf props

be wary of rotor, they're more 58%/-138 after the juice is taken out
hopefully the bucks or nuggets get steamed tomorrow

[yisman]

Fowler over Petrovic is about as lopsided a golf matchup as you'll find.

I don't like risking streaks on golf though, and especially not 9 hole golf.

Betfair:

Fowler +104 to win threesome, Petrovic +230.

Russian soccer is crooked, and the second golf one doesn't really have an edge.

Possibly going under in college again.

[revnecro1273]

going with kansas jayhawks..like to fade the high 90 percenters and a few people who are pretty horrid on another forum have kansas state

[revnecro1273]

not to mention sammy 11 is on kansas state

[lordswing]

going with kansas jayhawks..like to fade the high 90 percenters and a few people who are pretty horrid on another forum have kansas state

I'm treating this thread as a discussion for SftC, with the sole purpose of winning that 100k, and the monthly pool is just to keep us going. Still, imo the ultimate goal is building the longest streak for the month and win money.

I'm all for fading the public when gambling, but I don't think the same applies to streak/moneylines, especially when there's a "superior" (so says the books) option with the Wizards tonight. I completely understand not wanting to mess with preseason NBA, I for one consider myself extremely lucky when the Spurs and Celtics both hit game winning shots in the last 30 seconds. I realize that the books might not always have the correct team, but more often than not they're right. Unless you have some kind of insider info, I would consider the books opinion the most when making these picks.

I could of course be wrong, and Kansas State just gets stomped right from the gate. I wish you the BoL though, since everyone needs it to win that cool 100k.

[yisman]

I should've taken soccer


323 Avangard (RUS-1) +518
324 Rotor Volgograd (RUS-1) -220
Draw +273

^ 5 Dimes odds.

I think it closed at -212.

Both teams are horrible and also I was busy at the time, and didn't want to be distracted by a W6 on the line.

Tonight is interesting. Nuggets, Wizards, under.

Same as last night. Two NBA preseason, one NCAAF half.

[revnecro1273]

I'm treating this thread as a discussion for SftC, with the sole purpose of winning that 100k, and the monthly pool is just to keep us going. Still, imo the ultimate goal is building the longest streak for the month and win money.

I'm all for fading the public when gambling, but I don't think the same applies to streak/moneylines, especially when there's a "superior" (so says the books) option with the Wizards tonight. I completely understand not wanting to mess with preseason NBA, I for one consider myself extremely lucky when the Spurs and Celtics both hit game winning shots in the last 30 seconds. I realize that the books might not always have the correct team, but more often than not they're right. Unless you have some kind of insider info, I would consider the books opinion the most when making these picks.

I could of course be wrong, and Kansas State just gets stomped right from the gate. I wish you the BoL though, since everyone needs it to win that cool 100k.

well with a line of 3 and one would take the underdog they have about the same probability of winning su as they do with losing by 1 or 2 pts...yeah they wizards are pretty big chalk and on streak for the cash...but i hate siding with the higher percentages on the whole...but with that being said...my old man is on the bucks ats and he blows

[revnecro1273]

I should've taken soccer


323 Avangard (RUS-1) +518
324 Rotor Volgograd (RUS-1) -220
Draw +273

^ 5 Dimes odds.

I think it closed at -212.

Both teams are horrible and also I was busy at the time, and didn't want to be distracted by a W6 on the line.

Tonight is interesting. Nuggets, Wizards, under.

Same as last night. Two NBA preseason, one NCAAF half.

yeah that was a solid one...was on it...the higher percentage was on a pretty big dog

[revnecro1273]

actually...i am going to switch and take wizards...i see my old man is on the bucks at espn as well

[lordswing]

yeah, i should've checked the soccer this morning, was -188 at bet365 but heavy juice made that ~-138, missed out on 5dimes, ugh

20/20 etc

[revnecro1273]

knowing my luck the wizards will probably lose...seems that i almost always lose when i side with the higher percentage....yeah i lose when i take the lower percentages, but seem to lose more when i take the higher percentage

[yisman]

I think you should've just looked at 5 Dimes, which has lower vig.

The no juice line must've been about -200 this morning.

[revnecro1273]

5dimes having a worse price than bet365 would signal a play...usually never get a better price at bet365

[lordswing]

i checked last night, 5dimes/pinny didn't have the russian soccer game up, otherwise i would've went with them if i had known they're -200ish

[yisman]

Pinnacle never posted Russian League One at all.

5 Dimes did, but I don't know when they put it up.

I checked them finally this morning after giving up on Pinnacle.

[yisman]

tough decision.

I went with the Wizards finally, although I'm apprehensive given how the preseason has gone.

[l7ustin]

going with the wild for 7

[mikejamm]

How about that fuk'in choke by Fowler this morning!
I can't get shit go'in this month!

[lordswing]

already prepared to be disappointed in about 10 minutes

wizzies haven't shown up in the 2nd half, specifically the 4th

[tltaylor89]

Alabama fuked the whole month

[yisman]

Washington going to lose.

Now I just hope this ends quickly.

[lordswing]

Washington going to lose.

Now I just hope this ends quickly.

2nd half under?

[lordswing]

don't you tease me

[lordswing]

pinny's got 2nd half O/U at 21.5

[lordswing]

**** you streakmaster

[tltaylor89]

Link me to the new group

[yisman]

definitely second half under, but they deliberately locked it before unlocking NBA

NBA ended about 9:27

[yisman]

plus they moved the lock time to 9:32, which would've meant I could've gotten it in, but then they screwed us over by moving it back to 9:30.

Dick move by ESPN stalling the NBA unlock to screw everyone who picked it.

[yisman]

I really liked the second half under, too.

But it was hard to pick something that didn't have a line over a -230.

[lordswing]

i was pretty ticked off i couldn't get the pick in, i was refreshing the whole time too. that 2nd half under might've been the best pick looking back on it now, though

in playing with the half point calculator to calculate what kind of price 28.5 would've gotten, why am i not allowed to scroll up or down? is there not enough data for CFB totals?

[yisman]

I inquired in the think tank a few days ago.

two things:

1)it's intended for full game. That's where push probabilities come from

2)Any really low amount for a full game (like sub 30 for a halftime total) will not have anything there for it, so it won't show you.

But this was 7 points off the total, and the best pick odds-wise today, in my opinion.


Anyway, I must've refreshed like a dozen times trying to get that pick in.