Trump Tax Plan

[brooks85]

^always hilarious watching you dig your hole deeper khicks

too funny Brooks.

I am sure that all the shooting going on in Chicago is simply bc everyone is racing to get their hands on the most recent issue of the WSJ.

btw brooks ,,you keep investing,,I am sure you will catch that CEO in net worth in no time.

you would be 100% correct. People with income and wealth value their life. Take those things away and watch them turn into animals.


You keep proving my point here.

[khicks26]

Originally Posted by guitarjosh

How much did the driver pay for the truck? He is making money off of my property, and you're saying he owes me nothing. If workers can't use someone elses' property to make money, you're going to have few workers. People paid into SS, but if I pay money into a bank account, it doesn't give me a right to take out 2 times what I put in. I never said anyone should work until they're dead, but if they need money and can contribute to society, they should.

Yes, there isn't enough money to go around. The only reason those people have so much wealth is because they didn't spend it, they saved it. Also, many people in America have negative net worth, but they're not in danger of starvation. You're living the life compared to a person who is going to starve to death in the next 24 hours. Considering 49 million people pay over $10 a month just for HBO, we could end world hunger if people just cancelled their subscriptions and gave the money to the hungry.

You're talking about long term (held at least 12 months) capital gains rates, I'm talking about short term. Short term is treated as regular income when you pay taxes on it. Again, if you buy a house for 400k and sell it 10 years later for 480k, is that 80k income?

Its still making money without doing the work. No matter how many stories you make up. LOL

How is some people staving less than others a justification for the obscene wealth divide in the world? Very twisty.

[brooks85]

Its still making money without doing the work. No matter how many stories you make up. LOL

How is some people staving less than others a justification for the obscene wealth divide in the world? Very twisty.

[khicks26]

Those groups collectively didn't have the influence to push those racist laws in the 1920s, so using your definition, they weren't racist.



How much did the driver pay for the truck? He is making money off of my property, and you're saying he owes me nothing. If workers can't use someone elses' property to make money, you're going to have few workers. People paid into SS, but if I pay money into a bank account, it doesn't give me a right to take out 2 times what I put in. I never said anyone should work until they're dead, but if they need money and can contribute to society, they should.

Yes, there isn't enough money to go around. The only reason those people have so much wealth is because they didn't spend it, they saved it. Also, many people in America have negative net worth, but they're not in danger of starvation. You're living the life compared to a person who is going to starve to death in the next 24 hours. Considering 49 million people pay over $10 a month just for HBO, we could end world hunger if people just cancelled their subscriptions and gave the money to the hungry.

You're talking about long term (held at least 12 months) capital gains rates, I'm talking about short term. Short term is treated as regular income when you pay taxes on it. Again, if you buy a house for 400k and sell it 10 years later for 480k, is that 80k income?



I wasn't talking about that, I was talking about your claim that the middle class and poor pay more in taxes than the rich. Considering the richest 1% pay 45% of the income taxes and own most of the stock, therefore paying most of the capital gains taxes, I'd love to see you back up that claim.


I don't twist anything. Poor people in America are likely to have air conditioning, cable TV, the internet, a computer, microwave, etc. People around the world would love to only be a crisis away from having trouble with food, they already have that problem.



Where was it better for the average person at the time, and why did they move here and not there?

The funny thing is you're saying is was terrible, yet it was rapidly improving because they rejected the policies that you endorse. Places with those polices you like saw people moving away from there to America, not the other way around.

As for the rest, we have been over this. It won't make a dam bit of difference what I tell you.

[khicks26]

See brooks knows all about not working & taking the money.

[brooks85]

^I sure do but the funny part was how normally only kids 14ish and under are dumb enough say what you posted. It is obvious what a lack of education has done over time has your boy zappa pointed out.

As for the rest, we have been over this. It won't make a dam bit of difference what I tell you.

no penetrating shit, you're a proven liberal; a low IQ liar.


telling people that coal workers can build skyscrapers and that blacks can't be racist in USA then wondering why no one respects anything you say... lol

[khicks26]

[QUOTE=brooks85;26955408]



no penetrating shit, you're a proven liberal; a low IQ liar.


telling people that coal workers can build skyscrapers and that blacks can't be racist in USA then wondering why no one respects anything you say... lol[/QUOTE]

This sounds a lot like you Brooks.

[BarstoolProphet]

I just do not think that you or I ,Brooks, will ever see eye to eye on anything. At times , I can not distinguish if you are trolling or simply arguing just to argue. We all have our moments. You just seem to have more of them.

[khicks26]

^I sure do but the funny part was how normally only kids 14ish and under are dumb enough say what you posted. It is obvious what a lack of education has done over time has your boy zappa pointed out.








no penetrating shit, you're a proven liberal; a low IQ liar.


telling people that coal workers can build skyscrapers and that blacks can't be racist in USA then wondering why no one respects anything you say... lol

Zappa was talking about people like you. Systems manager clowns. Parasites that live off the work of others, as you just admitted.

Funny how you think a dork like you knows what Zappa is saying.

[brooks85]

Zappa was talking about people like you. Systems manager clowns. Parasites that live off the work of others, as you just admitted.

Funny how you think a dork like you knows what Zappa is saying.

lol lying about your own meme's, a new low for you.

[khicks26]

lol lying about your own meme's, a new low for you.

Standard useless do nothing DORK reply. Zappa was right about you.

[brooks85]

^excellent non-response but doesn't change the fact that lying about your own memes is an hilariously new low for you.

[khicks26]

^excellent non-response but doesn't change the fact that lying about your own memes is an hilariously new low for you.

and you voted for Trump. LOL

[brooks85]

...

another example of my second to none game theory skills... is complimenting me your new tactic?

[khicks26]

...

another example of my second to none game theory skills... is complimenting me your new tactic?

Complimenting You? You are stupid.

[brooks85]

yes...

and you voted for Trump. LOL

[khicks26]

yes...

Yes? You are stupid?

[brooks85]

Complimenting You? You are stupid.

lol proving you can't read again isn't going to help you. Which one of those sentences is a question?...


so again, yes. Your new tactic of complimenting me is an interesting one.

[khicks26]

lol proving you can't read again isn't going to help you. Which one of those sentences is a question?...


so again, yes. Your new tactic of complimenting me is an interesting one.

I know your stupid. Just wanted to know if you agree with that, it looks like you do. You think its a compliment.

[brooks85]

lol proving you can't read again isn't going to help you. Which one of those sentences is a question?...


so again, yes. Your new tactic of complimenting me is an interesting one.

lol 2x in a row


again complimenting me is an odd tactic, you can't run from it. You just did it. Post history. No surprise tho since you did say you'd vote for me for president.

common theme as always

facts vs your lies

reality vs your wonderland

[khicks26]

lol 2x in a row


again complimenting me is an odd tactic, you can't run from it. You just did it. Post history. No surprise tho since you did say you'd vote for me for president.

common theme as always

facts vs your lies

reality vs your wonderland

OK but your the one who agreed with yourself being stupid. Post History.

[brooks85]

OK but your the one who agreed with yourself being stupid. Post History.

lol the level of desperation. First you lie about your own meme then you lie about something on the very same page of the thread that proves it is a lie. Again you are proving why no one respects you khicks. Just a clown.

[khicks26]

lol the level of desperation. First you lie about your own meme then you lie about something on the very same page of the thread that proves it is a lie. Again you are proving why no one respects you khicks. Just a clown.

I said you are stupid. You replied YES. Not much else to it brooks.

You voted for a guy that fried the guy doing an investigation on him. If that doesn't say I'm stupid & guilty. Nothing does.

[brooks85]

it's not working for you khicks

Complimenting You? You are stupid.

lol proving you can't read again isn't going to help you. Which one of those sentences is a question?...


so again, yes. Your new tactic of complimenting me is an interesting one.

again, thank you for the compliments tho.

[khicks26]

it's not working for you khicks









again, thank you for the compliments tho.

What's not working?

Never mine, just shut up

[brooks85]

What's not working?

Never mine, just shut up

your constant lying khicks, it's not working


again, thank you for the compliments.

[khicks26]

your constant lying khicks, it's not working


again, thank you for the compliments.

So when I compliment you its a lie?

WTF are you talking about?

[brooks85]

lol it is hilarious how you confuse yourself.


Again, thanks for the compliments on my game theory skills by saying I voted trump.


also, lying about your own meme was a new low for you

[guitarjosh]

You mean like the US having segregation in the south, but not in the whole country. The Laws & workings of the American South was also something that the Nazi's admired

Like I said they would be Bigots. But anti semitism was around before the Nazi's. They were also not the only group to blame the Jews for the lose of WWI. Anti Semitism was also not isolated to Germany. To say they weren't racist would be a stretch.

The Nazis didn't have zones where their laws were in place in 1920s Germany. There are plenty of people in America that blame whites for the world's ills, but according to you, since those people lack power to do anything about it, they're only bigots, not racists. If your absurd belief about bigots vs racists were correct, racist laws wouldn't have increased as the Nazis' power and influence increased. The reason those laws weren't in place in the 1920s is because the Nazis had less power than blacks currently have in America, and therefore weren't racists, according to your definition.

Its still making money without doing the work. No matter how many stories you make up. LOL

How is some people staving less than others a justification for the obscene wealth divide in the world? Very twisty.

And they're still making money off of using the property of other people. It's not that you're against "free rent" as you put it, you're just the group you like to get it, and the group you hate to pay for it.

It isn't obscene. There is also the issue of productivity inequality that is the biggest driver of income inequality.

As for the rest, we have been over this. It won't make a dam bit of difference what I tell you.

We haven't been over long term capital gains vs short term, nor where in history it was better for the average person up until late 1800s America. Those 2 are so glaringly obvious you would lose there too, but we can go over them if you'd like.

[khicks26]

The Nazis didn't have zones where their laws were in place in 1920s Germany. There are plenty of people in America that blame whites for the world's ills, but according to you, since those people lack power to do anything about it, they're only bigots, not racists. If your absurd belief about bigots vs racists were correct, racist laws wouldn't have increased as the Nazis' power and influence increased. The reason those laws weren't in place in the 1920s is because the Nazis had less power than blacks currently have in America, and therefore weren't racists, according to your definition.

Nazi or not. Anti Semitism was in Germany. So your whole thing about laws. 1920's, & my definition carry's no weight. Its a BS analogy because you only count people that were Nazi's & not the fact Anti Semitism was part of German culture & racist.

Your twisting shit around. Stick to the facts.

[brooks85]

Nazi or not. Anti Semitism was in Germany. So your whole thing about laws. 1920's, & my definition carry's no weight. Its a BS analogy because you only count people that were Nazi's & not the fact Anti Semitism was part of German culture & racist.

Your twisting shit around. Stick to the facts.

the proven liar telling someone to stick to the facts


thanks for the compliments by the way.

[khicks26]

And they're still making money off of using the property of other people. It's not that you're against "free rent" as you put it, you're just the group you like to get it, and the group you hate to pay for it.

It isn't obscene. There is also the issue of productivity inequality that is the biggest driver of income inequality.



We haven't been over long term capital gains vs short term, nor where in history it was better for the average person up until late 1800s America. Those 2 are so glaringly obvious you would lose there too, but we can go over them if you'd like.

Josh your putting words in my mouth as you always do.

Sure we can go over the other stuff if you like.

The 1800's had slavery, child labor, the civil war, the robber barons, & no regulations. You could anything you wanted into a product, if it killed people or not, Native American slaughter. So maybe it would have been great for someone that thinks like you.

It was not great for the average person or labor. The years after WWII were much better for working people. The New Deal.

People still pay less of a tax on capital gains. Long or short. Most people with capital gains income have a pro doing their tax's. They pay no were near what labor is taxed at.

How do you think guys like Sorro's can make the statement that he pays a lower % than his secretary.

You are an apologist for the rich. Just own it.

[khicks26]

the proven liar telling someone to stick to the facts


thanks for the compliments by the way.

WOW fence post. You are boring the fuk out of me.

Post something good or shut up.

[brooks85]

WOW fence post. You are boring the fuk out of me.

Post something good or shut up.

lol the proven liar who has been beaten every step of the way against me telling me to post something good... khicks it isn't going to work.

The fact you can even post in this thread still is hilarious. And, as usual, josh is kicking your ass and your responding with loosely connected thoughts that mean nothing because the facts and logic are never on your side.

[rkelly110]

Meanwhile Trump's approval rating still remains dismal. Congress' approval rating is even worse.

Doesn't look good for Repub candidates coming up for re election. After 8 years of feet up, fukking off,
they lost their ability to lead. One of those cases of use it or lose it. Boy have they lost it.