A -415 NHL side

[Vegas39]

Then it is bullshit. If there was no whistle it is a goal. Toronto should have reviewed it, no if ands or buts around it, esp in OT.

Was shocked no review, sharks announcers were losing mind over fact replay official from Toronto in building

[Vegas39]

yeah am not arguing that...I beleive the puck was still live (no whistle) at the moment of crossing the line...would have to wait for a better video online with some sound to confirm that

Watched it live no whistle til batted back out

[Sam Odom]

You've gotta be fvcking kidding me.

Don't cry for me Argentina


.

[Russian Rocket]

Don't cry for me Argentina


.
[ATTACH]61770[/ATTACH]

books should void this fukking bet for everybody and give refunds back to Sharks bettors

[Simon Gruber]

NHL network hasn't shown a single highlight of this game since it ended. Nothing on espn.com or any tweets about this. League is probably begging people not so say anything about this.

[nyplayer33]

possibility game was fixed??? for the record i bet sharks minus 1.5 and don't care..fading buffalo is gold thus far

[Sam Odom]

books should void this fukking bet for everybody and give refunds back to Sharks bettors

+380 is a great #

[Vegas39]

books should void this fukking bet for everybody and give refunds back to Sharks bettors

Like this fiasco

[ZdenoK]

books should void this fukking bet for everybody and give refunds back to Sharks bettors

So books should void every 2nd soccer match too because half of the goals get scored from offside?

[Russian Rocket]

So books should void every 2nd soccer match too because half of the goals get scored from offside?

don't compare fukking non reviewable soccer offside goals to reviewable goals in NHL
NHL has a special place in Toronto designated to catch shit like this...this people are trained to do just that...nothing else

[Simon Gruber]

So books should void every 2nd soccer match too because half of the goals get scored from offside?

How can u compare something that happens every second match, to something that hasn't happened in the NHL since the replay system was implemented?

[DennisGreen]

-300 or higher favorite in NHL = auto play on opposition +1.5 PL. Seems to never lose

[Vegas39]

don't compare fukking non reviewable soccer offside goals to reviewable goals in NHL
NHL has a special place in Toronto designated to catch shit like this...this people are trained to do just that...nothing else

Its karma

[Sam Odom]

$$$ is what makes the world go around... Cannot discount a 'fix' -- The dog payoff was too big

[Russian Rocket]

Its karma

[ATTACH]61774[/ATTACH]

now that was a great hockey play

[Vegas39]

now that was a great hockey play

Another refs missed

[Sam Odom]

If Sammy had to choose... Take the + and go Ov 5 1/2

Wish Sammy took his own advice

[ZdenoK]

How can u compare something that happens every second match, to something that hasn't happened in the NHL since the replay system was implemented?

There is no review for high-sticking and often the refs will miss it, screwing over teams for PP. Do you remember Briere's offside goal in Flyers-Penguins playoff series 2 years ago? Or Douchene's offside goal last year? In the world championship Finland scored a goal under the netting to beat USA about 3-4 years ago. Shit like that happens in hockey even with cameras from every possible angle. There would be more void matches than you think. If the score is official, books shouldn't do shit about it. It's up to the league to take actions against morons overlooking stuff or referees making the bad calls.

PS: I was being sarcastic when I wrote half of the soccer goals get scored from offside, I don't know the number but watching some Champions League playoff matches last season there were many offside goals. I don't really care much about soccer

[ZetaPsi808]

the more i watch these games the more i think games are fixed

[jjgold]

A good lesson for all of us about betting heavy chalk

Nothing is a guarantee

Big favorites do in a gambler not big underdogs

[SEAHAWKHARRY]

LOL took Buffalo just for fun...hit it just for 50 but feels great

[rainman416]

Was on BUF in Reg.. lol at +600!! wake up to see they had a 3-1 lead in 3rd and blew it!! .. covered bet with a mini-ML bet.. but the only profit wouldda been from an In Reg. win..

NEVER catch me laying more than -250 on a ML play.. and even those would only sneak into a parlay or two... Hockey is a toss up game, no value in heavy chalk over -250 imo..

As buffalo proved last night...

[forthewin]

It doesn't matter how bad one team may be or how good the other team seems. No team ever is deserving of a ML over -250 being set on a hockey game. And never count out any team that is desperate for a win. Inflated lines and losing streak combinations in any one game are best to stay away from.

[Sam Odom]

Good thread men... Sharp advice from most

But it is time to move on --- New Day & New Games

[No coincidences]

$$$ is what makes the world go around... Cannot discount a 'fix' -- The dog payoff was too big

So why in god's name would you play SJ in any way, shape or form?

You're no spring chicken. You should know better than having to make a bailout hedge play on the BUF ML.

[VegasInsider]

What about taking Buffalo +1.5 (EV)

I like those odds.

BOOM!

[TonyTall]

deuce such a doush