A -415 NHL side

[Sam Odom]

Most ridiculous thing I've ever heard...

[Sam Odom]

jeeeesus

Heritage -440

[firedawg]

Agreed

[jayc88]

i would never lay -400 in hockey, even if i knew the line would be off

[Sam Odom]

Three things...

#1. It is Buffalo
#2. It is SJ on Home Ice
#3. SJ are 0-2 last two (losing 3 in a row !?)

i would never lay -400 in hockey...

But you are correct

[Russian Rocket]

Three things...

#1. It is Buffalo
#2. It is SJ on Home Ice
#3. SJ are 0-2 last two (losing 3 in a row !?)




But you are correct

they're not 0-2...they're 0-0-2...losing in OT or shootout is a lot different in hockey than losing in regulation time

[Sam Odom]

they're not 0-2...they're 0-0-2...losing in OT or shootout is a lot different in hockey than losing in regulation time

True in the way the NHL scores it... Sammy believes they are 10-1-3 but psychologically they are 0-2 last two. At least that is the way the sports press are writing it

[jjgold]

I would risk $40,000 if I had it Sammy on this

Its a sure thing

[Sam Odom]

I would risk $40,000 if I had it Sammy on this

Its a sure thing

Considering all things... you are mostly right

[Russian Rocket]

True in the way the NHL scores it... Sammy believes they are 10-1-3 but psychologically they are 0-2 last two. At least that is the way the sports press are writing it

actually psychologically they are 0-0-2...I'm not sure if you followed those games or not, but Sharks were on a verge of winning them both. The loss to LA in OT is legit...but losing to Yotes in shootout is a flip coin, so I'm not sure how you can put any weight on them going 0-2 here.

[jayc88]

i've heard brock landers needs this one badly to make up for the Packers debacle yesterday.

[Sam Odom]

Not even Brock would do this one... Would he ?

[Smoke]

So do we bet the doggy

[VegasInsider]

What about taking Buffalo +1.5 (EV)

I like those odds.

[Vegas39]

What about taking Buffalo +1.5 (EV)

I like those odds.

If playing a side probably best option. Or be ballsy and bet buff in regulation

[Russian Rocket]

If playing a side probably best option. Or be ballsy and bet buff in regulation

I know Vegas is sprinkling some on that line today

[Sam Odom]

actually psychologically they are 0-0-2...

Dan Boyle believes they lost against Phx. He said it felt good getting back to playing but went on to say "It's unfortunate we got the loss. We probably deserved better."


AP Sports wrote today:

A visit from the lowly Buffalo Sabres might provide the San Jose Sharks with a good opportunity to end their minor rough patch.

They'll look to avoid a third straight loss while trying to halt their recent struggles against the Sabres by handing them a fifth consecutive defeat Tuesday night

[Vegas39]

I know Vegas is sprinkling some on that line today

tempting since as Sammy said your boys were dominated last 2 games

[Sam Odom]

What about taking Buffalo +1.5 (EV)

maybe the best option... other than the Total

[Vegas39]

maybe the best option... other than the Total

which side of total is better

[Russian Rocket]

Dan Boyle believes they lost against Phx. He said it felt good getting back to playing but went on to say "It's unfortunate we got the loss. We probably deserved better."

AP Sports wrote today:

A visit from the lowly Buffalo Sabres might provide the San Jose Sharks with a good opportunity to end their minor rough patch.

They'll look to avoid a third straight loss while trying to halt their recent struggles against the Sabres by handing them a fifth consecutive defeat Tuesday night

"It's unfortunate we got the loss. We probably deserved better." ---they deserved better because they were dominating that game
-- good luck with your hockey bets if you base them off of AP Sports articles

[Russian Rocket]

which side of total is better

Vegas take Buffalo under 1.5

[Sam Odom]

which side of total is better

If Sammy had to choose... Take the + and go Ov 5 1/2

[VegasInsider]

Sharks TT O3.5 (+110) looks juicy, if you think the -400 is really warranted

[Sam Odom]

-- good luck with your hockey bets if you base them off of AP Sports articles

You seem to be confused...

You said losing a game in OT/SO really isnt losing psychologically

Sammy used being 0-2 as a motivational edge (ranked 3rd) for SJ to WIN tonight.

Simple as that

[easyliving]

Sabres+1.5 @+106 is the bet here

[Vegas39]

You seem to be confused...

You said losing a game in OT/SO really isnt losing psychologically

Sammy used being 0-2 as a motivational edge (ranked 3rd) for SJ to WIN tonight.

Simple as that

It it isn't the same. Team still gets a point.

Just hope playoff time San Jose shows up

[Russian Rocket]

You seem to be confused...

You said losing a game in OT/SO really isnt losing psychologically

Sammy used being 0-2 as a motivational edge (ranked 3rd) for SJ to WIN tonight.

Simple as that

Don't twist this shit Sammy

your original post:
#3. SJ are 0-2 last two (losing 3 in a row !?) -- that's you're talking about SJ winning tonight? give me a fukking break here

[Sam Odom]

#3. SJ are 0-2 last two (losing 3 in a row !?)

-- that's you're talking about SJ winning tonight?

Yes... No other way to read post #5 otherwise... Sammy was making the case for SJ being -415

Rocket... You went off on a tangent then got lost in the weeds

[Russian Rocket]

Yes... No other way to read post #5 otherwise... Sammy was making the case for SJ being -415

Rocket... You went off on a tangent then got lost in the weeds

The most retarded reply Rocket read the entire day.
Rocket wishes you luck with your hockey betting this year!

[Vegas39]

The most retarded reply Rocket read the entire day.
Rocket wishes you luck with your hockey betting this year!

that only means jay Vegas and seaweed haven't posted today

[Sam Odom]

Rocket one word: Interrobang

[firedawg]

no bet for me..............

[Russian Rocket]

that only means jay Vegas and seaweed haven't posted today

[Russian Rocket]

Rocket one word: Interrobang

I'm glad you brought this up - you obviously don't know when to use a fukking interrobang