How in the hell is Utah only -2?

MrShrink · 02-08-11, 12:46 AM

well... here we are jazz backers... and ONLY jazz backers, i'm sure....

dannyt76 · 02-08-11, 12:47 AM

Congrats Jazz backers. Yet another classic Kings 2H collapse. Painful to watch as a fan so at least I learned how to profit from my team's misfortune. Onto to tomorrow.

politicin · 02-08-11, 12:47 AM

... atleast they could say they are sharps though!! Boy it sucks to be us squares!!

demens · 02-08-11, 12:58 AM

Originally posted by politicin

... atleast they could say they are sharps though!! Boy it sucks to be us squares!!

Your square plays have you in the red tonight, so what exactly are you celebrating, that 1 of them squeaked by by 1 point? Congrats. I guess if home = road in your brain, then down must = up.

politicin · 02-08-11, 01:16 AM

This idiot thinks sports betting is a day to day thing

see how angry he is?

yeah boston found an L in charlotte and caught me in the red for the day... OH NO!!

11-4?

TERRIBLE RECORD

keep reaching... anytime you want to take me up on the offer of putting up money and seeing who makes more units from here until the playoffs... you let me know sweetie

*CRICKETS CRICKETS

politicin · 02-08-11, 01:27 AM

* crickets crickets

Inspirited · 02-08-11, 01:27 AM

lol what a joke

cannot believe the kings gave that away

politicin · 02-08-11, 01:28 AM

How could deze wefs allow dis!!?!?

Omggg stern iz gonna be mahddd!!

politicin · 02-08-11, 01:37 AM

Originally posted by MendozaLine

Do you not know what a trap is? Clearly Utah is a better team than Sacramento, so why are they only 2 point faves? Vegas feeds off of square bets like these.

whoops... fell right into the trap!!

classic example of... the WANNABE

lunchbawks · 02-08-11, 01:42 AM

i win?

politicin · 02-08-11, 01:43 AM

us squares have won!! YAYYYY

good game bawks...

you know the deal $$$$$

BetaB · 02-08-11, 01:47 AM

wow just 1 point cover.

SBRMAN23 · 02-08-11, 02:08 AM

They jus covered wow

vcj16 · 02-08-11, 03:31 AM

wrong side of the point spread covers again

politicin · 02-08-11, 03:46 AM

obvious easy pick

hawley · 02-08-11, 03:55 AM

Originally posted by politicin

obvious easy pick

nice cash anyway

politicin · 02-08-11, 03:59 AM

lmao i'm just busting people's balls obviously... the game would have been a bigger win if wills wrist wasnt jacked up... good cover however

JOHON8 · 02-08-11, 04:58 AM

Jazz came from behind, they were the right pick anyways, who can seriously trust Sacramento to hold a lead?

vyomguy · 02-08-11, 07:04 AM

lol this idiot actually thinks he is good for winning the squarest play on the board

.

Kings got 90% of the 50/50 calls in the game...jazz were damn lucky to win that game. The fix was in big time. You will know that if you actually watched the game. Even the commentators kept saying kings were getting all the calls....it was so obvious.

Keep betting the way you do and by the end of the season you will be in negative units.

Oh...and how many games did public win and how many did books win?.......public lost like 90% of their bets tonight. Books pretty much cleaned up tonight.

William Walters · 02-08-11, 11:00 AM

Originally posted by vyomguy

lol this idiot actually thinks he is good for winning the squarest play on the board

.

Kings got 90% of the 50/50 calls in the game...jazz were damn lucky to win that game. The fix was in big time. You will know that if you actually watched the game. Even the commentators kept saying kings were getting all the calls....it was so obvious.

Keep betting the way you do and by the end of the season you will be in negative units.

Oh...and how many games did public win and how many did books win?.......public lost like 90% of their bets tonight. Books pretty much cleaned up tonight.

vyomguy......."politicin" cashed his ticket. A win is a win. Let it go.

"squares".."joe public"..."sharps"....blah, blah, blah...........they all win....they all lose.

cleaveland · 02-08-11, 11:10 AM

Originally posted by vyomguy

lol this idiot actually thinks he is good for winning the squarest play on the board

.

Kings got 90% of the 50/50 calls in the game...jazz were damn lucky to win that game. The fix was in big time. You will know that if you actually watched the game. Even the commentators kept saying kings were getting all the calls....it was so obvious.

Keep betting the way you do and by the end of the season you will be in negative units.

Oh...and how many games did public win and how many did books win?.......public lost like 90% of their bets tonight. Books pretty much cleaned up tonight.

I think it was Jerry Sloan's constant complaining and staring the refs down that made the refs call the game fairer in the last half of the fourth. He gave the refs the evil eye several times and he complained a lot, he's got to have a lot of clout, I think he scared the refs straight but it was just enough for the Jazz to win.

About the 50/50 all going the Kings' way, what about the phantom calls? I laughed out loud a couple of times like when two Kings players tripped over each other and AK-47 was called for the foul while he was standing under the basket...

Or when Millsap touched no one and he had a basket taken away, he got in the ref's face and he said "Bullshit" a couple times and there was no tech so I think the ref's were admitting there was no foul... it truly was BS.

BillyGoat · 02-08-11, 11:39 AM

nice job politicin, we made a some cash

politicin · 02-08-11, 12:06 PM

Originally posted by vyomguy

lol this idiot actually thinks he is good for winning the squarest play on the board

.

Kings got 90% of the 50/50 calls in the game...jazz were damn lucky to win that game. The fix was in big time. You will know that if you actually watched the game. Even the commentators kept saying kings were getting all the calls....it was so obvious.

Keep betting the way you do and by the end of the season you will be in negative units.

Oh...and how many games did public win and how many did books win?.......public lost like 90% of their bets tonight. Books pretty much cleaned up tonight.

LOL @ biggest square play on the board

you sir are the definitive wannabe capper, you know nothing about sports or capping and you think you know it all because you post on a forum full of dweebs

I've been profitable for 4+ years sports betting... who the hell are you?

So I'll be in the red by the end of the year... put 200 points on it?

no? you dont want to?

k ill keep making money... as i always do... currently 11-4 since i started tracking on this forum...

and you'll continue to be broke and lame

politicin · 02-08-11, 12:09 PM

Originally posted by BillyGoat

nice job politicin, we made a some cash

stefank · 02-08-11, 12:11 PM

Geez, i watched the score when i woke up, for sure if i was watching the game i would have blown the monitor. I was on Jazz last night and 4th quarter seemd they rised from the dusk. Close to lose that bet.

politicin · 02-08-11, 12:13 PM

we got it stefan... good pick

$$$$$$$

ParlayJunkie · 02-08-11, 12:52 PM

Nice hit. I wish played it bigger. I went 3-0 yesterday though. GL

vyomguy · 02-08-11, 12:59 PM

Originally posted by politicin

LOL @ biggest square play on the board you sir are the definitive wannabe capper, you know nothing about sports or capping and you think you know it all because you post on a forum full of dweebs I've been profitable for 4+ years sports betting... who the hell are you? So I'll be in the red by the end of the year... put 200 points on it? no? you dont want to? k ill keep making money... as i always do... currently 11-4 since i started tracking on this forum... and you'll continue to be broke and lame

LOL...you dont want to know how much money I have made this NBA season....let me give you an idea....You put all four years of your winnings...and multiply it by like 20 or 30 times. You will roughly have the figure I am up this year.....capish

.

DIRTYDIRTY · 02-08-11, 01:04 PM

Thanx bro get it up lovin ur picks.

politicin · 02-08-11, 01:13 PM

love ya dirty...

MrShrink · 02-08-11, 01:48 PM

Originally posted by MrShrink

the nba IS fixed... to a degree... Like Donaghy said, he favored who he thought the powers that be would want to win. If you want to keep getting assignments, you try your best (as inconspicuosly as possible) to not give away the books' $$$ w/o being TOOO obvious. It's that simple. The nba doesn't have to SAY this to their refs, they just get it.... or they stop getting assignments. That being said, sometimes it's just beyond their control. They did everything they could at the end of the game to not pay off that Dallas ml in Boston the other day, just couldn't stop 'em w/o putting the ball in the hoop for Boston themselves. I'm sure the "powers" appreciated the effort, though, and that's all they WANT. Any more would blow their cover and they'd have to heed calls for refs being ousted. So they concede the loss and go on to the next one. Has anybody ever found any stat trends of refs prior to their firing/"retirement"/downtrend in assignments?

Same thing happened last night with the jazz, as i expected. Yes, it was an obvious, "too good to be true" kind of line. In other words a square play that looked like a setup. BUT... if you understand HOW the nba is fixed (SEE ABOVE) and are conscience of that in this situation and STILL feel like that team will overcome this... voila! SHARPNESS.

Therefore, if you chose the jazz to cover and deny that this was a square play at all, especially after watching how it was reffed... IT WAS A SQUARE PLAY!! If you were CONSCIENCE of the squareness/fixedness of the situation, and felt that the jazz would OVERCOME THAT, it was a sharp play.

Likewise, it was a square play if you jumped on SAC solely because UTA was the "setup" pick without giving any consideration to UTA's ability to overcome this.

There were square plays on both sides and sharp plays on both sides. Either way, it's a moot point. If you won, you won... If you lost, you lost... Only you know where your heart was when you made the bet and only you will make more/lose more with those winnings.

MrShrink · 02-08-11, 01:49 PM

oh.... and no.... jerry sloan's stare did NOT "fix the fix".

politicin · 02-08-11, 01:52 PM

God these guys are embarrassingly gullible...

you remember game four of the 96 finals? I remember michael jordan did this double step... i think if he hadn't done that the refs would have given the game to Seattle!!

i bet these idiots believe in reptilian tongue david icke people and robotic government enforcers... such comedy

MrShrink · 02-08-11, 02:34 PM

Originally posted by politicin

God these guys are embarrassingly gullible... you remember game four of the 96 finals? I remember michael jordan did this double step... i think if he hadn't done that the refs would have given the game to Seattle!!

i bet these idiots believe in reptilian tongue david icke people and robotic government enforcers... such comedy

What? Is that your response to me? Even though you didn't say anything that directly addresses anything I said, i'm going to assume it was...

If so, you are being extremely naive. ANYWHERE in the world where there are ungodly amounts of commerce flowing, THERE IS CORRUPTION. It's just that simple. Whether it's gambling on sports, the FDA telling you what's good/bad for you, brokers on wall street, cocaine in the ghetto... doesn't matter. IT'S CORRUPT. There are people all over the world that will eat their own children for the right price... but none that would attempt to steal your gambling $$$?

GET REAL.

Just as i tried to explain that there were sharps/squares on both sides of last night's game, there are sharps/square on both sides of this argument. Anybody that says that there is no corruption at all is just as dumb as the people that talk about reptiles and robots.

politicin · 02-08-11, 02:35 PM

no that was my response to the idiot who thinks Jerry Sloan reversed "the fix" by giving the evil eye...

you don't need to teach me about corruption... i'm very hip to the agenda