I just noticed one of my total post, Mako posted last night, hit..!!! Hope everyone was on it!!!
-
Comment -
summative here is pretty easy...need translation let me know.Originally posted by JMonComment -
Knew to this can you help translate. Don't mean to be a pain,....you guys got me intrigued ....new to NBA betting.Comment -
friend.. let's see what you come up first and then I'll help.Originally posted by comon kryptoniteComment -
Just another day using sdql! Potential is huge..if one takes the time to learn it!
WON: TOT UND 604 Raptors/Pistons under 206½ (-110) risk 220.00 win 200.00 (NBA) Score: 101-87 03/12/14 17:03:19 $200.00 #28846534
WON: TOT UND 606 76ers/Kings under 216½ (-110) risk 220.00 win 200.00 (NBA) Score: 98-115 03/12/14 17:03:19 $200.00 #28846534 WON: 611 Knicks -4 (-110) risk 220.00 win 200.00 (NBA) Score: 116-92 03/12/14 17:03:19 $200.00 #28846534 Comment -
Got one pending
615 Mavericks -4½ (-110) risk 220.00 win 200.00 (NBA) 03/12/14 17:03:19 #28846534 Comment -
Amazing JMon. Great day so far even if the Mavs play doesn't get up for you. Quick question, did you just download the SDQL manual and learn from that and how do you decide on which games to pick for the day? Im not even sure where to start with the SDQL queriesComment -
Only problem I have is understanding tS(ou margin, N=5) >= 30Originally posted by JMonComment -
going over the total by 30 or more points in their last five games. Now look at the summative ...and compare it ...pretty easy eh?Originally posted by cofagaComment -
go Mavs!Comment -
MLB is my best sport using SDQL..
Mako it's your thread. shall we keep it or start another one?Comment -
Yeah I get what it means now but how often do you use this parameter? Don't exactly know when it would be appropriate to useOriginally posted by JMonComment -
contrarian, I'v stated my approach many times. Look at what Vegas is going to do afterOriginally posted by cofagaComment -
Mavs winner....4-0Comment -
It's hard to say. I have lost a great deal of money using sdql; learning that is. Been at this for over 3.5 year . That last year in half, I'm generating 500-1000 a week using such. But I have worked at it; learned it.Originally posted by FortySix
Leaning: Google group is a must (search) , Bible that killersports put out helps you learn (free). Sports breakers tip sheet helps you learn as well.
It's hard to say. It will come. Mako will say the same thing. Learning and practice.Comment -
cavs ml+300 winnnerOriginally posted by JayHorne3Mako,
Can you check the following SDQL because this seems to good to be true: If correct it is saying 32-0 ATS with a play tomorrow night
AD and A(W)<=0.500 and p:L and pp:L and op:L and opp:L and oA(W)>=0.500 and season>=2005
thanks 
Comment -
Originally posted by JMonwhat are those querys buddy ??Originally posted by JMonGot one pending
615 Mavericks -4½ (-110) risk 220.00 win 200.00 (NBA) 03/12/14 17:03:19 #28846534 Comment -
cant wait for your mlb sdql .Originally posted by JMon
start another one for mlb
Comment -
this are from last nba season
Play against any Good Team as a home favorite coming off of three road games (83-58, 58.9% ATS): Teams returning home from road trips are often lethargic and that has been especially true of Good Teams, as these teams are expected to win and have oftentimes just gone through the motions in their first home game back in an attempt to save some energy. The angle went 0-1 in the last seven days. Keep an eye on: Qualifying plays this week as of now are Denver at Oklahoma City on Wednesday and Washington at the Clippers on Saturday.
Play the ‘under’ in division games if the home team went ‘under’ in its last four games (67-45, 59.8%): Bettors love to bend on ‘overs’ and they tend to overreact to ‘over’ streaks while hardly batting an eye when it comes to ‘under’ streaks. In fact, many are so stubborn that they continue to bet the ‘over’ even when the home team, which more often than not is the team that controls the tempo, has shown a strong propensity for going ‘under’. Also, ‘under’ streaks are more likely to continue in the all-important division games, which are usually played closer to the vest to begin with. Keep an eye on: Believe it or not, there is currently only one NBA team on an ‘under’ streak as long as only two games, with that being the Detroit Pistons.
Play on any road underdog of +6 or more coming off of five ATS losses (75-49-2, 60.5% ATS): Bettors do not like betting on teams that are not covering spreads, and when teams that have been burning money turn up as decided road underdogs, those people cannot wait to get some money down on the home chalk. Well, here is a nice case of regression to the mean, as well as bookmakers shading the lines a bit to give the ugly underdogs value. Keep an eye on: The Sacramento Kings already have a five-game ATS losing streak while the Golden State Warriors are at four games.
Play on any conference road team that has lost its last six games straight up (116-77-3, 60.1% ATS): Bettors also hate playing teams on straight up losing streaks, especially on the road, so again the books can shade their lines a bit. When these teams do rise up and turn in competitive efforts or break their losing streaks outright, it is often vs. familiar conference opponents as this record indicates. This angle went 1-0 in the last seven days with the Bobcats beating the Bulls outright to snap an 18-game losing streak! Keep an eye on: Is there suddenly parity in the NBA? The longest straight up losing streak in the league through January 13th is just three games by the Houston Rockets.
Play against any home team that has won its last three games straight up and is now facing a Bad Team (130-83, 60.8% ATS): This combines two factors that lead to some counterintuitive value, as you are going against a hot team and simultaneously playing on a team that has lost at least 70 percent of its last 30 games and that is usually avoided by bettors, allowing the books to pad the lines a tad. This angle describes the Letdown Theory to a tee, as the streaking team is filled with confidence and feels that it can conserve some energy and still come out on top vs. a Bad Team, especially while playing at home. This angle had another good week going 3-1 over the last seven days. Keep an eye on: teams that qualify as Bad Teams as of January 13th are the Charlotte Bobcats, Cleveland Cavaliers, New Orleans Hornets, Phoenix Suns and Washington Wizards.Comment -
They sure as hell were, that was easy $$$! Thanks JOriginally posted by JMon
Definitely, let's do it! We might as well have a master thread for each sport, eventually they'll grow into archives full of great queries and scenarios, will go start one in the MLB area now.Originally posted by JMon
EDIT: The SDQL thread for MLB is live, cheers all:
I can only speak for myself, but I can definitely say that Jmon has accelerated all of our learning curves tremendously in this thread alone, saving thousands of dollars of experimentation that otherwise would have had to happen to get sharp at this technique. It's one thing to be able to find and/or develop queries, but it's a whole other game learning when and why they'd don't work, or begin to fail.Originally posted by JMon
That's expensive as hell to go through and rediculously time consuming as each season ticks by without results... and it's why most of the major betting message boards have hardly any threads about SDQL research despite it being available for years...because 90%+ of the people who chase it, really pursue it, either fail outright or barely scrape 50% over time.
There's a true art to it. Thanks again to Jmon and to all the others who are contributing their knowledge here as well, this is easily the best concentrated group working in this area online currently. Rock and roll!
Comment -
Intriguing, rewarding system...
But I'm lost.Comment -
tS(W, N=6)>=5 and AF and p:L and line>=-4 and WP>60 and rest=1
Over play, lemme what you guys think. It has a pretty high rateComment -
I have been trying to write in SDQL, but can't understand how I can check - Bulls games at home after conceding more than 100 points at home in previous game (that they lost would be a better option).
Can some one show me what should I write to get this checked please?Comment -
My golden state / clipper post on page 12 yesterday was a winnerComment -
Originally posted by dmitean
team=Bulls and p:HL and po: points>100
Team bulls and home loss and previous opp scored 100+
Is that what you're asking for ?
((Take out the space in between po: p ))Comment -
Yes, thanks!
Just added Bulls playing at home tonight as well.
Bulls managed to stop their opponent below their team's total on 4 out of 6 home games in the last two seasons after home loss in which rival scored 100+ points.
In one of the two times the opponent went Over his total, Bulls still won and covered (against the Knicks).Comment -
Nice jobOriginally posted by NBACover. We need some better organization of queries in the MLB thread. I am losing track of everyone's work 
Comment -
Originally posted by Mako-SBRThey sure as hell were, that was easy $$$! Thanks J
Definitely, let's do it! We might as well have a master thread for each sport, eventually they'll grow into archives full of great queries and scenarios, will go start one in the MLB area now.
EDIT: The SDQL thread for MLB is live, cheers all:
I can only speak for myself, but I can definitely say that Jmon has accelerated all of our learning curves tremendously in this thread alone, saving thousands of dollars of experimentation that otherwise would have had to happen to get sharp at this technique. It's one thing to be able to find and/or develop queries, but it's a whole other game learning when and why they'd don't work, or begin to fail.
That's expensive as hell to go through and rediculously time consuming as each season ticks by without results... and it's why most of the major betting message boards have hardly any threads about SDQL research despite it being available for years...because 90%+ of the people who chase it, really pursue it, either fail outright or barely scrape 50% over time.
There's a true art to it. Thanks again to Jmon and to all the others who are contributing their knowledge here as well, this is easily the best concentrated group working in this area online currently. Rock and roll!
Comment -
not bad, three losing seasons in a row is troublesome with a restrictive query like this.Originally posted by cofagaComment -
thanks for the "learning curve' gentlemenComment -
A little late but I tweaked it to get this for the fade play, which i was going for originally and not the overOriginally posted by JMon
tS(W, N=6)>=5 and AF and p:L and line>=-4 and WP>60 and rest=o:restComment -
tS(A, N=6)=6 and HF and WP<50
Another fade query, really simple oneComment -
what mean tS(A, N=6)=6 ??Originally posted by cofagaComment -
Last 6 games have been AwayOriginally posted by figue
Anyone got a good query for the thunder/laker game? I'm looking at the under atmComment -
today bucks was a winner makos query.
Comment
