2012 NCAA picks

[No coincidences]

Please don't make another about this game because you are on the wrong side coin........

Remember controlling emotions starts by not showing them.............

The wrong side that you were bragging about being the right side early? Or was that just more lies? I just can't keep your bullshit straight anymore.

[hondo5]

You're a clown Pauly. You're broke ass needs to find something to do.

[Vortexx00]

[PAULYPOKER]

The wrong side that you were bragging about being the right side early? Or was that just more lies? I just can't keep your bullshit straight anymore.

I ignore losses and wins..........

[No coincidences]

I ignore losses and wins..........

Obviously.

[PAULYPOKER]

Obviously.

Remenber Coin,

losing your emotions is key to having any chance,

it does not matter what others think of you,

this forum is a faceless tool,

treat it as such..............

[No coincidences]

Remenber Coin,

losing your emotions is key to having any chance,

it does not matter what others think of you,

this forum is a faceless tool,

treat it as such..............

You are so full of shit I can smell it through my computer screen.

So let me get this straight: you're a big winner away from SBR (the typical "if I told you, you wouldn't believe me" line), yet you spend a ton of time trolling around here, you're points broke (you're even paying on a loan), you won't post plays (and when you had a thread you melted down and left the forum), and you've resorted to the "LOCK!!!" jinx threads that are just that when they win (Packers yesterday) but the exact opposite when they lose (GT today). Do I have all of that right?

[suicidekings]

What are you doing with LSU tonight, NC?

Earlier in the day, when the line dropped back to -4.5, I was thinking of taking -7 (+140). I think the revitalized DL is going to make it very tough on Boyd to work out of the pocket. In 4 games against comparable defenses this season (FSU, Auburn, VTech, SC), he got sacked 17 times. Metzenberger and his WRs will have worked hard on execution in practice, and I think he probably has his best game of the year tonight.

[PAULYPOKER]

You are so full of shit I can smell it through my computer screen.

So let me get this straight: you're a big winner away from SBR (the typical "if I told you, you wouldn't believe me" line), yet you spend a ton of time trolling around here, you're points broke (you're even paying on a loan), you won't post plays (and when you had a thread you melted down and left the forum), and you've resorted to the "LOCK!!!" jinx threads that are just that when they win (Packers yesterday) but the exact opposite when they lose (GT today). Do I have all of that right?

No I am using this forum to my advantage and nothing more,

you are my largest case study since you are not afraid to let it all hang out...............

[No coincidences]

No I am using this forum to my advantage and nothing more,

you are my largest case study since you are not afraid to let it all hang out...............

You are clearly certifiable.

I'm done with this. What a waste of time. Peace.

[No coincidences]

What are you doing with LSU tonight, NC?

Earlier in the day, when the line dropped back to -4.5, I was thinking of taking -7 (+140). I think the revitalized DL is going to make it very tough on Boyd to work out of the pocket. In 4 games against comparable defenses this season (FSU, Auburn, VTech, SC), he got sacked 17 times. Metzenberger and his WRs will have worked hard on execution in practice, and I think he probably has his best game of the year tonight.

LSU or nothing for me.

[Dexter]

You are so full of shit I can smell it through my computer screen.

So let me get this straight: you're a big winner away from SBR (the typical "if I told you, you wouldn't believe me" line), yet you spend a ton of time trolling around here, you're points broke (you're even paying on a loan), you won't post plays (and when you had a thread you melted down and left the forum), and you've resorted to the "LOCK!!!" jinx threads that are just that when they win (Packers yesterday) but the exact opposite when they lose (GT today). Do I have all of that right?

NC - check your PM

[No coincidences]

NC - check your PM

Yeah, I just saw it.

[PAULYPOKER]

You are clearly certifiable.

I'm done with this. What a waste of time. Peace.

What I meant was,

I read your posts to help myself know what not to be in the gambling sense of mind.......................

[No coincidences]

LSU -210 (8.4U to win 4)
LSU PK/over 52.5 tease (3.3U to win 3)
LSU TT over 31.5 (2.4U to win 2)

[thetrinity]

Become A Pro!Join Date: 01-18-10
Posts: 44,074
SBR Points: 4887

Message Me

Clemson plays zero D, and their offense can score in bunches.

I wouldn't touch this personally. I think LSU wins like 31-24, which is way too close for my comfort.

so why are u on the tt over 31.5 -120

[CBASS]

Gl to us No coin...I'm on LSU ML as well.

[No coincidences]

Gl to us No coin...I'm on LSU ML as well.

I'm pretty sure they win, but it wouldn't surprise me if Clemson covers or comes very close.

[No coincidences]

Become A Pro!Join Date: 01-18-10
Posts: 44,074
SBR Points: 4887

Message Me

Clemson plays zero D, and their offense can score in bunches.

I wouldn't touch this personally. I think LSU wins like 31-24, which is way too close for my comfort.

so why are u on the tt over 31.5 -120

Because the line is screaming over on the game total, and I also like playing TT's when they're a hook above a key number.

[paco]

Come on now, Clemson had no shot to begin with. Sec domination

[PAULYPOKER]

Come on now, Clemson had no shot to begin with. Sec domination

This

[No coincidences]

Come on now, Clemson had no shot to begin with. Sec domination

Well, I'm not really sure what to say about this game. As I pointed out in another thread, it was a lot like Oregon State/Texas -- the better team was in control until they started playing like they were trying to lose and sure enough, they lost.

[No coincidences]

Well, it's do or die time for me and this thread today.

Wisconsin +6 (9.4U to win 8)
Nebraska +9 (5.5U to win 5)
Purdue +17.5 (2.2U to win 2)
Northwestern +1 (1.1U to win 1)
South Carolina -190 (1.9U to win 1)

[No coincidences]

Well, it's do or die time for me and this thread today.

Wisconsin +6 (6.9U to win 6)
Nebraska +9 (5.5U to win 5)
Purdue +17.5 (2.2U to win 2)
Northwestern +1 (1.1U to win 1)
South Carolina -190 (1.9U to win 1)

Adding:

Northwestern ML (2.4U to win 2)
Nebraska +10 (3.75U to win 3)

[BigDofBA]

Brutal beat with LSU yesterday. I too under 28.5 for the second half but almost went Big on LSU.

It seems like they had no business losing that game up doubled digits under 4 minutes with one of the best defenses in the country. When Clemson converted 4th and 16th it was a lock they were going to win. It never fails.

I'm not sure why Miles decided to throw the fall on 2nd and 4rd downs in short yardages situations. LSU has one of the best o-lines in the country and their strength is running, not passing. That was just baffling. They had two plays to get like three yards and the game was over. Instead they throw two incomplete passes.

Good luck today and Happy New Year.

[sarasmith]

Pauly did have his own thread in NCAA tourney this year...until his lost 40 units on one play before it had barely got underway . Guy has NEVER EVER posted a screenshot of a winning ticket. He is so pathetic I can only assume he is a shill paid by SBR in points just to generate traffic.

[Shark]

good luck no coincidences. I cant believe the wisky line is down to 3.5 from the initial 7. Almost no value anymore.

[PAULYPOKER]

[No coincidences]

Nebraska. How did I know that 4Q was coming?

WIS +11/under 54 tease (4.4U to win 4)
WIS/STAN under 48 (2.2U to win 2)

[t-wizzle]

Nebraska. How did I know that 4Q was coming?

WIS +11/under 54 tease (4.4U to win 4)
WIS/STAN under 48 (2.2U to win 2)

You paid extra to beat the closer though.

[No coincidences]

You paid extra to beat the closer though.

What do you mean? With the side I locked in hours ago? I'd rather have the +6 than anything less if that's what you're talking about.

[t-wizzle]

What do you mean? With the side I locked in hours ago? I'd rather have the +6 than anything less if that's what you're talking about.

With nebraska +10 -115.

[No coincidences]

WIS/STAN under 48 (2.2U to win 2)

Adding 10U to this. It's 46 at Pinnacle -- I can't pass on that difference.

Let's go D.

[No coincidences]

With nebraska +10 -115.

Well it wound up being irrelevant anyway.

I meant the 4Q collapse -- never said I beat the closer there, which I didn't.

Do you not have anything better to do than stalk me these days?

[t-wizzle]

Well it wound up being irrelevant anyway.

I meant the 4Q collapse -- never said I beat the closer there, which I didn't.

Do you not have anything better to do than stalk me these days?

Lol relax. Is your thread off limits or something?

You were going on and on about how unimportant it is to beat the closer yet you paid -115 juice on nebraska and now you're taking the Under in the Rose Bowl because, admittedly, you're getting a great number.