John Morrison 2011 MLB

[dlunc3]

lookin like a great night Wallco

[Wallco99]

lookin like a great night Wallco

Milwaukee blew a good lead, but then again, Washington had a 6 run 7th. Not bad overall so far.

[SkivChef]

as a life long cub fan........................

[oklahoma]

brewers open as dogs so no -1.5 rl bet as of now unless we take the alternate.

[knugen]

À really nice night ... Thx wallco

[oklahoma]

now that all games are done..great picks wallco

[1gamer]

CASH PLU$$$ tonite Nicely done buddy!

[peeiempee]

Nice nite, just need to clear that Brewers/Cubs Runline and we'll be good

[Wallco99]

Wallco MLB PLU$$$
2011 System to date: 94-6
System profit/loss: +26.41 units (finished series)
Since my first post: +6.14 units (79-6) (fin. series)
Current open series: 1 (-3.00 units)

(6/14/11) Colorado (M/L) (B) – Win
(6/14/11) Colorado (-1½) (B) – Win
(6/14/11) Chicago Cubs (-1½) (B) – Loss
(6/14/11) Philadelphia (M/L) (A) – Win
(6/14/11) Philadelphia (-1½) (A) – Win
(6/14/11) Washington (M/L) (A) – Win
(6/14/11) San Francisco (M/L) (A) – Win


(A) 49-48
(B) 20-25
(C) 12-13
(D) 7-6


Games for (6/15/11):
Milwaukee @ Chicago Cubs (-1½) (C) (8:05 pm EDT)


** Do not place any wagers on teams unless the word “Official” appears next to the game. All lines and standings are based on final lines from ScoresandOdds.com. Some of the unofficial plays may change to the other team by game time. Official plays will not change. Keep checking for updated posts until all games are marked “official”. If your book is offering (+1½) on the (-1½) plays above, buy the alternate line for (-1½) on the team I have listed at (-1½), not the other team. NEVER PLAY (+1½) LINE ON ANY GAME IN THIS SYSTEM.
System backtest can be found in post #3446.

[bauerranch]

Sorry I was traveling and missed the good night yesterday- Congrats

[dlunc3]

The Hedge Chase

http://forum.sbrforum.com/baseball-handicapping/1123921-hedge-chase-totals-system-p3.html

6/15


SD *OVER* - 15:10 EST (C bet)
Cincy *OVER* - 15:10 EST (A bet)
Texas *OVER* - 19:05 EST (A bet)
Cleveland *OVER* - 19:05 EST (C bet)
SL *UNDER* - 19:05 EST (A bet)
Boston *OVER* - 19:10 EST (A bet)
Milwaukee *UNDER* - 20:05 EST (A bet)
Oakland *UNDER* - 22:05 EST (B bet)


Record: 5-1
+1.25 units
3 series pending

**Plays are on the game totals, not team totals

Best of luck on all your plays today

[mikey360]

Great night Wallco, completely cleared up my A&B Line last night, very nice.

[pagodo]

Brilliant stuff, Wallco!

[thelimit0310]

Great night last night only 1 JM series and 1 Wallco series to clear up. I'm still down from the 4 D bet losses, hopped on board before I could get any profit to absorb them, but the system itself is back up and recovered and that's great. Awesome job Wallco and Hagball!

[IceBet]

Games for (6/15/11):
Milwaukee @ Chicago Cubs (-1½) (C) (8:05 pm EDT)


** Do not place any wagers on teams unless the word “Official” appears next to the game. All lines and standings are based on final lines from ScoresandOdds.com. Some of the unofficial plays may change to the other team by game time. Official plays will not change. Keep checking for updated posts until all games are marked “official”. If your book is offering (+1½) on the (-1½) plays above, buy the alternate line for (-1½) on the team I have listed at (-1½), not the other team. NEVER PLAY (+1½) LINE ON ANY GAME IN THIS SYSTEM.
System backtest can be found in post #3446.

Hey Wallco,

Didn't I just read a discussion that Cubs have never won more than 2 straight all season? So far they won the A & B bet, so why the C bet?

I trust in your system and will play as you post but just a thought.

IceBet

[hagball52]

JM MLB System

2011 Official season series record 11-1 (v1) 1 series pending
(A) 8-5
(B) 2-2
(C) 1-1
V2 plays 1-1
V3 system 1-1
Unofficial series 6-0

Next Plays

Official
(6/14/2011) Detroit (.515)v Cleveland (.511) M/L (A) Win
(6/14/2011) Arizona (.505)v San Francisco (.516) M/L (A) Loss

Next Plays
Official
(6/15/2011) Arizona (.505) v San Francisco (.518) M/L (B) (6/16 (C) if necessary)

Upcoming Plays
(6/17/2011) Oakland v San Francisco

Notes: First off, notice that I recorded a loss on the V2 plays. All of us were so busy we didn't realize that the Yankees (C) bet was a V2 play because they lost the (B) bet by more than 3 runs. Here's the rules from page 1:
Similarly, you want to increase your stake on the [C] level when these 2 criteria are met:
1. The team you’re betting on is playing at home.
2. The [b] bet that you made resulted in your team losing by 3 or more runs.
Luckily we didn't up our bet size. Today ARI is a slight favorite again, this time I think the line will move in their direction but monitor it anyway. Also have 2 possible sweeps today, will update in the morning. Have not received an email from JM yet but as you can see the rpi is changing. However, he did assure us that these 2 current plays would not be like the last. (LOL)

[hagball52]

Just got the email from Morrison. Nothing special, no "boldly declared" statements.

Good job last night Wallco. Very impressive.

[h00dini]

Good job wallco

[bruce0]

Wallco MLB PLU$$$ - Plays for 6/14/11
2011 System to date: 88-6
System profit/loss: +19.73 units (finished series)
Since my first post: -0.54 units (73-6) (fin. series)
Current open series: 3 (-3.65 units)

Milwaukee (-1 ½) @ Chicago Cubs (B) *Official* (8:05 pm EDT)

Wallco your official play yesterday was for Milwaukee -1.5, not Chicago. I really hope today's play is not Cubbies for the sweep.

[peeiempee]

Wallco your official play yesterday was for Milwaukee -1.5, not Chicago. I really hope today's play is not Cubbies for the sweep.

It's a system. Did you think Boston would sweep yankess 7 games in a row. Or Twins would sweep Royals at a 4 game home stand. That's what system plays are play with no emotion

[thelimit0310]

Wallco your official play yesterday was for Milwaukee -1.5, not Chicago. I really hope today's play is not Cubbies for the sweep.

2 things:

1. DO NOT quote official play posts, they cause confusion when posted more than once.
2. If the play falls under criteria, then it's a play. If we took all these different factors into account we would be no better than your average gambler.

[IceBet]

2 things:

1. DO NOT quote official play posts, they cause confusion when posted more than once.
2. If the play falls under criteria, then it's a play. If we took all these different factors into account we would be no better than your average gambler.

[bruce0]

2 things:

1. DO NOT quote official play posts, they cause confusion when posted more than once.
2. If the play falls under criteria, then it's a play. If we took all these different factors into account we would be no better than your average gambler.

My question was for Wallco, who listed yesterday's loss as being on the Cubs -1.5, not you.

I deliberately cutoff the quote from yesterday and left in the date so it would not be confused with his typical plays. If someone mistakes what is clearly not a complete Wallco post for today well...

Wallco's play was in the wee hours of the morning so I want to make sure it's not a mistake like his reference to yesterday's play being on the cubs. I'm surprised no one else mentioned that. I think I have that right to ask that without catching a lecture.

[thelimit0310]

Wallco was the one who originally said not to quote official play posts. You don't want to confuse people, I was caught off guard until I saw the date in your quote, other people may not be so cautious. Besides, if you've followed the system at all you would know the plays sometimes switch teams throughout a series. Not trying to start another argument on this thread so i'll just say nothing is set in stone until it is *Official*. The pick switching happens often. Hope that answers your question.

[bruce0]

Like I said just want make sure he's given it a second look since the previous play from yesterday was recorded inaccurately. Only wallco answered that question. I'm in the same boat as you by jumping on at the downfall so want to be especially sure.

[bruce0]

Like I said just want make sure he's given it a second look since the previous play from yesterday was recorded inaccurately. Only wallco can answere that question. No worries I'm in the same boat as you by jumping on at the downfall so want to be especially sure.

[knugen]

What u guys think about Arizona game, Will they stay as favs, or do u play them RL?

[1gamer]

Great a V1, V2, and V3 Loss already for JM. So much for a undefeated season.

[Bugs Bunny]

Like I said just want make sure he's given it a second look since the previous play from yesterday was recorded inaccurately. Only wallco can answere that question. No worries I'm in the same boat as you by jumping on at the downfall so want to be especially sure.

just chill and relax guys

[thelimit0310]

Arizona's -1.5 line is a huge + money bet because San Fran won by 1 run yesterday. I played money line because the line was -112, easy juice to swallow if it loses. But taking -1.5 may be the best bet. Up to you all and good luck

[oklahoma]

Arizona's -1.5 line is a huge + money bet because San Fran won by 1 run yesterday. I played money line because the line was -112, easy juice to swallow if it loses. But taking -1.5 may be the best bet. Up to you all and good luck

arizonas been swept on the runline only twice all year. in theyre giants and mets series. considering theyre one of the best runline teams out there this should be an interesting game and plus +181 odds are to good to pass up.

[G's pks]

Maybe wallco should be the only one that quotes his plays for the record..some of you guys are causing to much confusion...starting to think you wear dresses!

To many systems...to many experts...cut the thread back down to JM and Wallco...amd for those of you that have something negative to say....I do not care...so do not clog the thread you mushes...

[BCC585]

Maybe wallco should be the only one that quotes his plays for the record..some of you guys are causing to much confusion...starting to think you wear dresses!

To many systems...to many experts...cut the thread back down to JM and Wallco...amd for those of you that have something negative to say....I do not care...so do not clog the thread you mushes...

I have to agree.
Dont get me wrong guys, I really do like some of these new systems that just came in but I feel like there is so many conflicts about which one is better or drama in general.
It's like clash of the systems in here.
I think if everyone made their own thread it would be less cluttered and less drama filled.

[ITSNOT]

Hey wallco, havent really been following you or JM since basketball, good luck on your new system, ima start betting small on it, I see you got some losses already so hopefully this is a good time to jump in.
My question is if you have ever backtested JM system but taking the ML on dogs and RL for favs, I know you will have more losses but most plays would be + odds so maybe it would even out. This is how I plan on doing it for baseball for now.
Sorry if this has been discussed here but just way too much bs to sift through on this thread, wish it was more like the JM/Chase110 thread you guys had for basketball. Anyways thanks for the picks and all that.

[simonk83]

Interesting, will be keeping an eye on this thread