baseball one of the only sports where this line movement means didly squat.... heavy chalk loses everyday. +170 and above hits EVERYDAY.. I was on Zona Early.. Greinke wasn't about to penetrate us two starts in a row. and he pitches well on the road.. never even checked the scoree until after the game.
2017 MLB plays
Collapse
X
-
shocka1212SBR Posting Legend
- 10-06-12
- 16788
#561Comment -
BigDofBASBR Posting Legend
- 09-30-09
- 19313
#562baseball one of the only sports where this line movement means didly squat.... heavy chalk loses everyday. +170 and above hits EVERYDAY.. I was on Zona Early.. Greinke wasn't about to penetrate us two starts in a row. and he pitches well on the road.. never even checked the scoree until after the game.
It seems like paying attention to teams that are hitting or teams that have rested bullpens pays off the most. Teams go on winning streaks and losing streaks.
Ride the streaks. Example, I faded Chicago every game against San Diego. I figure I would lose at some point since the Padres were heavy underdogs....nope. It's not a coincidence either. Some schmuck out there probably chased the Cubs despite the fact that they aren't hitting at all. They're struggling. Why would you back them? With that said, the Books kept making them -175, -190, etc.Comment -
underalSBR High Roller
- 02-27-12
- 224
#563I pay less and less attention to the lines. They're pointless. The people setting them are just trying to entice action.
It seems like paying attention to teams that are hitting or teams that have rested bullpens pays off the most. Teams go on winning streaks and losing streaks.
Ride the streaks. Example, I faded Chicago every game against San Diego. I figure I would lose at some point since the Padres were heavy underdogs....nope. It's not a coincidence either. Some schmuck out there probably chased the Cubs despite the fact that they aren't hitting at all. They're struggling. Why would you back them? With that said, the Books kept making them -175, -190, etc.Comment -
Snake24SBR MVP
- 06-14-14
- 2366
#564Baseball is tough to bet. I had Marlins and Angels last night. Tough beats.Comment -
2daBankSBR Aristocracy
- 01-26-09
- 88966
#565
I just don't get why some ya'll can't respectfully disagree? Different opinions are what makes things interesting. I understand why nc rubs folks wrong way at times but at end of day getting bent out of shape over it and behaving as you are in his thread just comes off as petty and rude. If you have that big a problem with somebody it pretty easy to go on with your life in your own thread.Comment -
2daBankSBR Aristocracy
- 01-26-09
- 88966
#566You really turning this into a dick measuring contest huh? Why anyone is worried with anything other than their own bankroll is incredibly puzzling to me.. I ain't trying to come down on you or take sides, just so happens you the one who littering his thread with this nonsense. What your agenda here?Comment -
Machine ChoiceSBR MVP
- 12-12-08
- 3997
#567@bank: he trolls other people, including me earlier this week. I've always known what he is, but never cared enough to actually call him out. It's about time he gets his own medicine. He's a big boy and can defend himself. His picks suck, he sucks, and he can suck me.Comment -
2daBankSBR Aristocracy
- 01-26-09
- 88966
#568
To me it like this, if someone doesn't like you fine, by all means they entitled to their opinion. Hell i don't like a lot of ppl I just don't see much point spending my time worrying about it!!
Questioning your integrity or track record is insane and completely different story tho. we all know damn well you post and track every season and have been for what 7-8 years? Anyone attacking you in this matter flat out wrong...Comment -
2daBankSBR Aristocracy
- 01-26-09
- 88966
#569@bank: he trolls other people, including me earlier this week. I've always known what he is, but never cared enough to actually call him out. It's about time he gets his own medicine. He's a big boy and can defend himself. His picks suck, he sucks, and he can suck me.Comment -
Machine ChoiceSBR MVP
- 12-12-08
- 3997
#570He talked a big game last night and lost. Meanwhile I spent a whole 5 minutes capping the Twins first five innings and won while drunk on Jack Daniels. So here's the deal. I will leave this prick's loser thread alone so he can keep tracking his Skittles units. I usually mind my own business and do my own thing, but I don't want to ever want to hear from this f\*\*k again. He doesnt rate to address me, in person or digitally. Now here's your thread back, you girls have fun. Bank, good luck to you.Comment -
2daBankSBR Aristocracy
- 01-26-09
- 88966
#571Lol. Well at least that shit was funny!! Personally I don't think I could say I'm better than anyone at this even tho I probably am! Lol. We all lose buddy you know this, none of us have a crystal ball!!
I know this unlike you why it so curious to me, I have no doubt nc make some type snide condescending remark to set you off, he certainly has been known to do so. Just seems incredibly unproductive to spend so much time seeking revenge over it., that just me tho., gl to you as well machine.Comment -
2daBankSBR Aristocracy
- 01-26-09
- 88966
#572The more and more I quit reading too much into these lines, the better I do.
I wanted to take the Yankees too but the Jays seemed favored by too much so I figured there must be something I wasn seeing. Nope. Easy winner.
Same with this game. I had some fortune late but a winner is a winner. I've lost many a games like this where my only consolation was, "well at least I was on the right side."
Who care about that if it loses? Who cares about beating the closer of it loses?
Maybe I'm evolving lol
I disagree with second part tho as a individual game result means very little, we all gonna lose 40-50% of our plays so in the long run it still means a great deal to get better of the closer, not as a predictive quality simply as the effect on our bankroll throughout the season..Comment -
kingdomSBR Posting Legend
- 07-25-10
- 10099
#573Is the chicago money pushing this line? or the idea they have to win at some point? Everybody here likes cards. Hope we all win.Comment -
2daBankSBR Aristocracy
- 01-26-09
- 88966
#574Biggest thing I dislike bout cards is seems everyone on them. Certainly good reason, imo you gotta be freaking insane to lay that number on lackey.Comment -
kingdomSBR Posting Legend
- 07-25-10
- 10099
#575Lol, you're just pissed because the millionth SBR poster has called you out as the fraud douche that you are. Not hard to pick Marlins tonight when DBacks are only averaging 1.4 runs per game on the road vs lefties, but we'll see if it holds up. I would have passed on this game, but if you win...then my congrats for calling it and winning it. Now why don't you do your thing and leave me the f\*\*k alone in my threads so I don't have to come in here and scold you like a step child. Good luckComment -
kingdomSBR Posting Legend
- 07-25-10
- 10099
-
2daBankSBR Aristocracy
- 01-26-09
- 88966
#577I have no problem being on other side of steam. Hell lot of times I am against as it tends to create value on the other team.. The fact there a lot of money on a team doesn't make it the right side. I've always trusted my own capping and simply play when I believe a teams chances are greater than price indicates. Has worked well for me over the years.Comment -
No coincidencesSBR Aristocracy
- 01-18-10
- 76300
#578He talked a big game last night and lost. Meanwhile I spent a whole 5 minutes capping the Twins first five innings and won while drunk on Jack Daniels. So here's the deal. I will leave this prick's loser thread alone so he can keep tracking his Skittles units. I usually mind my own business and do my own thing, but I don't want to ever want to hear from this f\*\*k again. He doesnt rate to address me, in person or digitally. Now here's your thread back, you girls have fun. Bank, good luck to you.
Talk about mentally unhinged.Comment -
No coincidencesSBR Aristocracy
- 01-18-10
- 76300
#579Dude I've never seen him litter someone else's thread with this much junk.. true I've seen him make some condisending type remarks to folks but it doesn't go on and on and on like this.. I ain't here to defend anyone I just don't like threads I enjoy visiting to have conversations be all clustered with this crap. There simply no reason for it. The minute I go in your thread and see pages of this shit I will have the same type comments for whoever ruining your thread. I respect everyone that takes the time to have a season long thread and just don't think anyone doing so should have to deal w their thread taking on all this unwarranted bs..
Comment -
2daBankSBR Aristocracy
- 01-26-09
- 88966
#580Here is the thread he's freaking out about. Talk about thin skin.
https://www.sportsbookreview.com/for...ion-today.html
not even gonna start a argument/discussion about how silly premise of the thread was to begin with. Only bet motivated team? No clue how one would go about determing such a thing during a random single gm of a 162 gm season?? Maybe later on when one team isn't playing for anything, outside of that seems to me be impossible to judge such a thing.Comment -
Machine ChoiceSBR MVP
- 12-12-08
- 3997
#581You girls crack me up. Bank let me help. NATS were 9.5 games up in the division when they faced the weak ass Padres. How pumped do you think the Nats were for that game? You think they were excited about the game, focused in, ready for some good disciplined at-bats? Or maybe just swinging at first pitch thinking the game is in the bag. C'mon man, use some common sense. I've seen these unmotivated teams play out like this all the time. The classic trap game.
Same thing with Boston. You dont think they got a scouting report before the game that told them their opponent was a gas can waiting to destruct? Of course they did. So they swing for the fence on every fastball and say "f\*\*k it, we'll get him next inning." Except it doesn't happen.Comment -
2daBankSBR Aristocracy
- 01-26-09
- 88966
#582I disagree with that. Good teams know picking on bad teams how you make the playoffs. Especially in Red Sox case where they in a ultra competitive division. Don't think you can hindsight it and say since they played poorly they weren't motivated, why they win the other games then? I just don't think trying to determine motivation is anything other than a exercise in futility. But as I say all the time there plenty of ways to go about what we do and just cause I don't think something is worth considering doesn't mean it isn't., just don't believe there any way anyone could start a thread and simply tell us everyday which team motivated and have success on such a premise..
There no need for This whole "you girls" bs. I'm a grown ass man and assume you are as well. You wouldn't come up to me at a bar and call me a bitch so let's keep it respectful here. Thanks..Comment -
Machine ChoiceSBR MVP
- 12-12-08
- 3997
#583Okay, if you say so. Good luck to you guys, do whatever the f\*\*k you want. I'm out of here unless, like the Godfather, NC starts pouting again at me and pulls me back in. I need to go work on my own games. I actually don't think it's hard to spot a trap game. But if you think it is, you've always got good old Coiner to offer you his expert advice from his Obama phone.Comment -
2daBankSBR Aristocracy
- 01-26-09
- 88966
#584i don't believe in traps so feel no need to identify them.. I'll leave all that noise to the line reading experts. I cap the games a way that makes sense to me, play where I see value. To me everything else is just noise.. don't see how hard it is to discuss this stuff in respectful fashion, that what men do where I'm from..gl manComment -
CappinTerpSBR Hall of Famer
- 11-26-09
- 9650
#587Coiner......Relax....these trolls are most likely,deficient in many aspects of their life and are miserable, don't stoop down the their levels!!......................And keep up the great cappin !! ........................................ ..BOLComment -
No coincidencesSBR Aristocracy
- 01-18-10
- 76300
#588TOR +115 (3U to win 3.45)
MIA -113 (3.39U to win 3)
TEX +112 (2U to win 2.24)Comment -
Sam OdomSBR Aristocracy
- 10-30-05
- 58063
#589how long has this sub-forum been running ?
never been down here beforeComment -
Sam OdomSBR Aristocracy
- 10-30-05
- 58063
#591Wowhad no idea
Comment -
2daBankSBR Aristocracy
- 01-26-09
- 88966
#592I don't believe you!Comment -
No coincidencesSBR Aristocracy
- 01-18-10
- 76300
#593OAK +101 (3U to win 3.03)Comment -
pacoSBR Aristocracy
- 05-07-09
- 62873
#594Anyone like the tigers over?Comment
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code