College Football Week 3 AI Predictions: ATS Picks & Score Projections for Top 25 Games
Last Updated: September 17, 2026 10:19 AM EDT • 13 minute read X Social Google News Link
With the regular season underway, the college football AI predictions for Week 3 feature score projections and against-the-spread picks for 25 of the best games on the slate.
Week 3 features several intriguing conference and non-conference matchups, headlined by No. 7 LSU visiting No. 8 Ole Miss on Saturday night. No. 5 Miami travels to Wake Forest on Friday, while Florida State visits No. 10 Alabama and No. 16 SMU faces No. 23 Louisville on Saturday afternoon.
The ChatGPT AI model considers performance through the first two weeks, advanced metrics, roster and coaching changes, injuries, matchup advantages, home-field edge, and current market movement. All ATS picks below use Kalshi's college football spread markets as of Thursday, Sept. 17.
Follow all of SBR's college football picks throughout the season and check the latest college football odds before kickoff.
College Football Week 3 AI predictions
| Date | Kickoff (ET) | Prediction | ATS pick |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thu., Sept. 17 | 7:30 p.m. | Pittsburgh 30, Syracuse 20 | Syracuse +10.5 |
| Fri., Sept. 18 | 7:30 p.m. | Miami 38, Wake Forest 17 | Wake Forest +20.5 |
| Fri., Sept. 18 | 8 p.m. | Texas Tech 34, Houston 24 | Houston +7.5 |
| Sat., Sept. 19 | Noon | Georgia 42, Arkansas 14 | Georgia -24.5 |
| Sat., Sept. 19 | Noon | Kansas State 31, Tulane 20 | Tulane +20.5 |
| Sat., Sept. 19 | Noon | Arizona State 30, Kansas 27 | Kansas +5.5 |
| Sat., Sept. 19 | Noon | Clemson 27, North Carolina 20 | Clemson -3.5 |
| Sat., Sept. 19 | Noon | North Texas 31, Texas State 27 | North Texas +2.5 |
| Sat., Sept. 19 | 12:45 p.m. | Vanderbilt 27, NC State 24 | NC State +3.5 |
| Sat., Sept. 19 | 3:30 p.m. | Alabama 38, Florida State 20 | Florida State +20.5 |
| Sat., Sept. 19 | 3:30 p.m. | SMU 30, Louisville 27 | SMU +1.5 |
| Sat., Sept. 19 | 3:30 p.m. | Texas A&M 38, Kentucky 17 | Texas A&M -17.5 |
| Sat., Sept. 19 | 3:30 p.m. | Utah 41, Utah State 13 | Utah -27.5 |
| Sat., Sept. 19 | 4 p.m. | Duke 31, Stanford 17 | Duke -9.5 |
| Sat., Sept. 19 | 4:15 p.m. | South Carolina 31, Mississippi State 24 | South Carolina -3.5 |
| Sat., Sept. 19 | 6 p.m. | Florida Atlantic 30, FIU 24 | FIU +9.5 |
| Sat., Sept. 19 | 7 p.m. | Florida 27, Auburn 24 | Florida -2.5 |
| Sat., Sept. 19 | 7:30 p.m. | Northwestern 24, Colorado 20 | Northwestern -3.5 |
| Sat., Sept. 19 | 7:30 p.m. | Virginia 31, West Virginia 20 | Virginia -9.5 |
| Sat., Sept. 19 | 7:30 p.m. | BYU 34, Colorado State 17 | Colorado State +17.5 |
| Sat., Sept. 19 | 7:30 p.m. | LSU 31, Ole Miss 28 | LSU -2.5 |
| Sat., Sept. 19 | 7:30 p.m. | Notre Dame 38, Michigan State 17 | Michigan State +29.5 |
| Sat., Sept. 19 | 7:30 p.m. | Maryland 27, Virginia Tech 24 | Maryland +2.5 |
| Sat., Sept. 19 | 8 p.m. | Texas 38, UTSA 17 | UTSA +30.5 |
| Sat., Sept. 19 | 11 p.m. | UCLA 31, Purdue 20 | Purdue +14.5 |
Syracuse at Pittsburgh AI prediction
| Team | 1Q | 2Q | 3Q | 4Q | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Syracuse | 3 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 20 |
| Pittsburgh | 7 | 10 | 6 | 7 | 30 |
Pittsburgh deserves to be favored at home and has looked like the more complete team through the opening weeks. The Panthers should have an advantage defensively and can make Syracuse work for sustained drives rather than allowing easy explosive plays. Still, laying double digits in an ACC matchup is a sizable ask. Syracuse has enough offensive ability to remain competitive if it protects the football, and a 10-point Pittsburgh victory would be enough for the Orange to sneak inside the number.
ATS pick: Syracuse +10.5
Miami at Wake Forest AI prediction
| Team | 1Q | 2Q | 3Q | 4Q | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miami | 10 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 38 |
| Wake Forest | 3 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 17 |
Miami has looked every bit like a national title contender and followed its impressive start by hanging 77 points on Florida A&M. The Hurricanes have a massive talent advantage here, but Kalshi's spread requires them to win by nearly four touchdowns on the road. Wake Forest doesn't need to seriously threaten an upset to provide value and should be able to slow the game down enough to avoid a complete runaway. SBR's college football lookahead lines also identified this as a potentially tricky spot for Miami.
ATS pick: Wake Forest +20.5
Houston at Texas Tech AI prediction
| Team | 1Q | 2Q | 3Q | 4Q | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Houston | 7 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 24 |
| Texas Tech | 7 | 10 | 10 | 7 | 34 |
Houston enters this ranked Big 12 matchup with plenty of momentum, while Texas Tech has enough offensive firepower to justify being a sizable home favorite. Will Hammond gives the Red Raiders a dangerous option under center, but Houston has enough defensive talent to prevent Texas Tech from consistently creating separation. The Cougars don't need to threaten for the outright win to provide value, and a competitive first half could make a double-digit spread difficult for the Red Raiders to cover.
ATS pick: Houston +7.5
Georgia at Arkansas AI prediction
| Team | 1Q | 2Q | 3Q | 4Q | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Georgia | 7 | 14 | 14 | 7 | 42 |
| Arkansas | 7 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 14 |
Georgia enters Week 3 off a 70-point performance, while Arkansas was thoroughly outplayed in a 43-10 loss to Utah. That sets up a difficult turnaround for the Razorbacks against an even deeper, more physical opponent. Georgia should control both lines of scrimmage and force Arkansas into obvious passing situations once the Bulldogs build an early advantage. The road setting makes laying more than three touchdowns uncomfortable, but the talent gap is substantial enough to justify it. Georgia remains one of the favorites in SBR's college football national championship odds.
ATS pick: Georgia -24.5
Tulane at Kansas State AI prediction
| Team | 1Q | 2Q | 3Q | 4Q | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tulane | 3 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 20 |
| Kansas State | 7 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 31 |
Kansas State has the roster and home-field advantage to win this matchup, but the early Kalshi number requires the Wildcats to create nearly three touchdowns of separation. Tulane is too well-coached and experienced to assume that will happen. The Green Wave can shorten the game with sustained possessions and force Kansas State to earn its points rather than relying on constant short fields. Kansas State gets the straight-up edge, but a competitive first half should make it difficult for the Wildcats to cover such a large number.
ATS pick: Tulane +20.5
Arizona State at Kansas AI prediction
| Team | 1Q | 2Q | 3Q | 4Q | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona State | 7 | 10 | 6 | 7 | 30 |
| Kansas | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 27 |
Both teams are looking to bounce back from disappointing Week 2 performances. Arizona State was overwhelmed at Texas A&M, while Kansas lost the Border War to Missouri at home. The Sun Devils still have the stronger overall profile and should be able to generate explosive plays against the Jayhawks, but getting more than a field goal at home is appealing for Kansas. This matchup looks more like a one-possession Big 12 battle than a comfortable road win, especially if Kansas establishes its running game early.
ATS pick: Kansas +5.5
North Carolina at Clemson AI prediction
| Team | 1Q | 2Q | 3Q | 4Q | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina | 3 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 20 |
| Clemson | 7 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 27 |
Clemson's start hasn't been particularly convincing, and the Tigers now face additional uncertainty with starting quarterback Christopher Vizzina unavailable and freshman Tait Reynolds expected to start. North Carolina can make this competitive by avoiding obvious passing situations and forcing the inexperienced quarterback to sustain drives. Clemson still has the stronger defensive roster and the advantage at Death Valley, but the quarterback change makes laying points less comfortable and should keep this closer than originally projected.
ATS pick: Clemson -3.5
North Texas at Texas State AI prediction
| Team | 1Q | 2Q | 3Q | 4Q | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Texas | 7 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 31 |
| Texas State | 7 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 27 |
North Texas rebounded impressively from its season-opening loss and now gets a Texas State team that has struggled defensively against stronger competition. The Bobcats have home-field advantage and enough offensive talent to turn this into a high-scoring matchup, but North Texas should find opportunities to generate chunk plays throughout the afternoon. With Kalshi making Texas State a slight favorite, the Mean Green don't need much to provide value. This is one of the better outright underdog opportunities among the 25 games.
ATS pick: North Texas +2.5
NC State at Vanderbilt AI prediction
| Team | 1Q | 2Q | 3Q | 4Q | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC State | 7 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 24 |
| Vanderbilt | 7 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 27 |
Vanderbilt deserves the slight edge at home, but this matchup should be much more competitive than a typical SEC-ACC non-conference game. NC State has the defensive personnel to keep Vanderbilt from consistently generating explosive plays, and that creates value beyond a field goal. The Commodores should be more efficient offensively and have a better chance to finish drives, but this projects as a game that stays within one possession deep into the fourth quarter. Taking the points with the Wolfpack is the more attractive ATS position.
ATS pick: NC State +3.5
Florida State at Alabama AI prediction
| Team | 1Q | 2Q | 3Q | 4Q | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florida State | 3 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 20 |
| Alabama | 10 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 38 |
Alabama looked dominant in its first SEC test, beating Kentucky 45-17, and the Crimson Tide should have another significant talent advantage against Florida State. However, the Kalshi line has climbed beyond three touchdowns, which creates a very different betting decision. Florida State has enough athletes on both sides of the ball to generate a few scoring drives and prevent Alabama from completely controlling the margin. The Crimson Tide should win comfortably, but a projected 18-point victory makes taking more than three touchdowns the better ATS position.
ATS pick: Florida State +20.5
SMU at Louisville AI prediction
| Team | 1Q | 2Q | 3Q | 4Q | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMU | 7 | 10 | 6 | 7 | 30 |
| Louisville | 7 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 27 |
This ranked ACC matchup looks much closer to a toss-up than a game where either side should be trusted to create separation. Louisville has home-field advantage and responded well after a narrow loss to Ole Miss, but SMU possesses enough offensive firepower to attack the Cardinals for four quarters. The Mustangs should be able to create explosive plays through the air while forcing Louisville to answer consistently. With Kalshi giving SMU points, there's value in taking the underdog in a matchup it can legitimately win outright.
ATS pick: SMU +1.5
Kentucky at Texas A&M AI prediction
| Team | 1Q | 2Q | 3Q | 4Q | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kentucky | 3 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 17 |
| Texas A&M | 10 | 14 | 7 | 10 | 41 |
Texas A&M made a statement in Week 2 with a 48-20 win over Arizona State, while Kentucky was beaten by four touchdowns at home against Alabama. The Aggies now get another favorable matchup at Kyle Field, where their defensive front should make it difficult for Kentucky to consistently sustain drives. Texas A&M also has enough offensive balance to punish the Wildcats if they begin selling out against the run. A spread above two touchdowns is significant, but the Aggies have the matchup advantages needed to create a comfortable second-half margin.
ATS pick: Texas A&M -17.5
Utah State at Utah AI prediction
| Team | 1Q | 2Q | 3Q | 4Q | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Utah State | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 10 |
| Utah | 10 | 14 | 10 | 7 | 41 |
Utah State showed some fight in a narrow loss at Washington, but the challenge becomes much harder against a Utah team coming off a dominant 43-10 win over Arkansas. The Utes should control the line of scrimmage and lean on their defense to keep giving the offense favorable field position. Rivalry games can produce unexpected results, but a significant physical gap separates these teams. Utah has already shown it can turn favorable matchups into blowouts, and another comfortable victory is likely.
ATS pick: Utah -27.5
Stanford at Duke AI prediction
| Team | 1Q | 2Q | 3Q | 4Q | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford | 3 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 17 |
| Duke | 7 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 31 |
Stanford has struggled to consistently generate offense against quality opponents, and Duke should be able to take advantage at home. The Blue Devils have the more reliable offense and don't need to produce many explosive plays if their defense keeps Stanford in long-yardage situations. Duke can also control possession and gradually wear down a Cardinal defense that may spend too much time on the field. At less than double digits, the Blue Devils have enough advantages on both sides of the ball to cover.
ATS pick: Duke -9.5
Mississippi State at South Carolina AI prediction
| Team | 1Q | 2Q | 3Q | 4Q | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mississippi State | 7 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 24 |
| South Carolina | 7 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 31 |
This SEC matchup should remain competitive, but South Carolina has a significant home-field advantage and the stronger defensive front. Mississippi State can keep it close by avoiding turnovers and staying balanced offensively, but consistently converting long drives in Columbia is difficult. The Gamecocks don't need to dominate to cover a number below a touchdown, and their ability to generate pressure should become more important late if Mississippi State is forced into a pass-heavy game script. South Carolina gets the nod by seven.
ATS pick: South Carolina -3.5
FIU at Florida Atlantic AI prediction
| Team | 1Q | 2Q | 3Q | 4Q | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIU | 7 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 24 |
| Florida Atlantic | 7 | 10 | 6 | 7 | 30 |
Florida Atlantic deserves to be favored at home, but rivalry games are rarely an ideal spot to lay a large number. FIU should know what the Owls want to do and has enough offensive capability to stay within striking distance all night. FAU has the cleaner path to the outright victory and should generate more consistent scoring opportunities, but nearly double digits provide FIU plenty of room to cash without seriously threatening to win. A six-point Owls victory makes the underdog the preferred ATS side.
ATS pick: FIU +9.5
Florida at Auburn AI prediction
| Team | 1Q | 2Q | 3Q | 4Q | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florida | 7 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 27 |
| Auburn | 7 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 24 |
Florida heads into Jordan-Hare Stadium as a short road favorite in a matchup that could come down to quarterback play. Auburn's home-field advantage should keep this competitive, but Florida has the more complete roster and should be able to generate enough pressure without consistently blitzing. That gives the Gators more flexibility against an Auburn offense that will need to avoid obvious passing situations. Neither side looks likely to run away with this game, but laying less than a field goal is reasonable with Florida projected to win by three.
ATS pick: Florida -2.5
Colorado at Northwestern AI prediction
| Team | 1Q | 2Q | 3Q | 4Q | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colorado | 3 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 20 |
| Northwestern | 7 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 24 |
This matchup lacks the offensive firepower of some of Week 3's headliners, but Northwestern has a chance to make the game physical and uncomfortable for Colorado. The Wildcats should be able to control possession, limit drives, and force Colorado to execute consistently rather than rely on explosive plays. That style gives Northwestern a meaningful home-field advantage in what projects as a lower-scoring contest. The spread sits just above a field goal, but a four-point Wildcats win is enough to get there.
ATS pick: Northwestern -3.5
West Virginia at Virginia AI prediction
| Team | 1Q | 2Q | 3Q | 4Q | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| West Virginia | 3 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 20 |
| Virginia | 7 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 31 |
Virginia has climbed into the Top 25 and gets an opportunity to continue its strong start against West Virginia in a neutral-site matchup at Bank of America Stadium in Charlotte. The Cavaliers have been more reliable offensively and should be able to create favorable matchups through the air, but there's no true home-field advantage here. West Virginia can keep things competitive by establishing the run and shortening the game, though Virginia still has more ways to score as the matchup progresses.
ATS pick: Virginia -9.5
BYU at Colorado State AI prediction
| Team | 1Q | 2Q | 3Q | 4Q | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BYU | 7 | 10 | 10 | 7 | 34 |
| Colorado State | 3 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 17 |
BYU enters Week 3 unbeaten after handling Arizona 28-17, and the Cougars have a clear roster advantage against Colorado State. Still, this is a road game with Kalshi asking BYU to cover nearly three touchdowns. Colorado State doesn't have to match the Cougars drive for drive to provide value; a couple of scoring possessions and a slower game script could be enough. BYU should control the matchup and win comfortably, but a projected 18-point margin falls short of the large early-week spread.
ATS pick: Colorado State +17.5
LSU at Ole Miss AI prediction
| Team | 1Q | 2Q | 3Q | 4Q | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSU | 7 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 31 |
| Ole Miss | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 28 |
Week 3's marquee matchup could easily come down to the final possession. LSU has looked dominant defensively through the opening weeks, while Ole Miss has the offensive firepower and home-field advantage to challenge the Tigers for four quarters. LSU's ability to pressure without constantly committing extra defenders is the deciding factor, as it should limit the explosive plays Ole Miss relies on. SBR's college football lookahead lines also highlighted LSU in this matchup. With the spread below a field goal, the Tigers get the edge.
ATS pick: LSU -2.5
Michigan State at Notre Dame AI prediction
| Team | 1Q | 2Q | 3Q | 4Q | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan State | 3 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 17 |
| Notre Dame | 10 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 38 |
Notre Dame has the roster to dominate this matchup and enters Week 3 after shutting out Rice 52-0. The question is whether the Fighting Irish can create enough separation to cover almost 30 points against a Big Ten opponent. Michigan State doesn't need to consistently move the football if it can simply avoid giving Notre Dame short fields and manufacture a couple of scoring drives. The Fighting Irish should win comfortably, but a three-touchdown margin still leaves plenty of room for Michigan State to cover this enormous number.
ATS pick: Michigan State +29.5
Virginia Tech at Maryland AI prediction
| Team | 1Q | 2Q | 3Q | 4Q | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia Tech | 7 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 24 |
| Maryland | 7 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 27 |
Kalshi has Virginia Tech as a short road favorite, but Maryland looks capable of winning this matchup outright. The Terrapins have home-field advantage and should be able to generate enough offense against a Hokies defense that hasn't shown enough consistency to justify laying points away from home. Virginia Tech can keep this close by controlling the line of scrimmage, but Maryland has the more attractive setup in a matchup with very little separating the teams. Getting points with the home side provides extra value.
ATS pick: Maryland +2.5
UTSA at Texas AI prediction
| Team | 1Q | 2Q | 3Q | 4Q | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UTSA | 3 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 17 |
| Texas | 10 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 38 |
Texas is coming off a massive 24-23 victory over Ohio State and now faces a much less imposing opponent at home. The Longhorns should control this game on both sides of the ball, but the early Kalshi spread asks them to win by more than 30 points. UTSA showed enough offensive ability in its win over Texas State to suggest it can manufacture a few scoring drives, particularly once Texas begins rotating players with a comfortable lead. The Longhorns win easily without necessarily covering the enormous number.
ATS pick: UTSA +30.5
Purdue at UCLA AI prediction
| Team | 1Q | 2Q | 3Q | 4Q | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Purdue | 3 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 20 |
| UCLA | 7 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 31 |
UCLA has the offensive advantage and should benefit from playing this Big Ten matchup at home, but Purdue getting nearly two touchdowns creates some value. The Boilermakers can stay within the number if they avoid turnovers and prevent UCLA from consistently producing short scoring drives. The Bruins have enough talent to build a double-digit advantage, particularly after halftime, but this doesn't project as the type of mismatch where Purdue should be completely overwhelmed. An 11-point UCLA victory keeps the Boilermakers narrowly inside the spread.
ATS pick: Purdue +14.5
📃 Affiliate disclosure
Sportsbook Review may receive a commission if you sign up through our links. Not intended for use in MA. Bonuses not applicable in Ontario. 21+ only. (Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER)
Quinn Allen X social