Murray Will Be Number 1 Within 1 Year

[yisman]

I thought Del Potro would be the new number 1 but watching Murray he has the whole package and unreal court speed. Fed was hammering the corners and Murray got to most of him. If he won third set I think he would of won match.

Coach knows his tennis!

[yisman]

Another good one...

[jjgold]

He wins this I will be right again

So close already

I am sharpest tennis guy here

[Smoke]

Derrick Rose will never be a dominant player

[Smoke]

How'd that go for you??????????? huh

[Smoke]

27K on OKC thunder after game 1 in finals

How'd that go for you??????????? huh

[yisman]

nole?

I like Murray and Djokovic the most because of what they have proven and because of their age.

Del Potro and Cilic could be up there, but the next year should tell the story.

Then there will be new youngsters on the rise.

bumping my old Djokovic posts.

http://forum.sbrforum.com/tennis-betting/222299-best-handicap-bet-us-open-2009-a.html#post2191101

don't sleep on Djokovic. I'm feeling a breakthrough one of these days.

Maybe Ball covers, but I see Djoker advancing deep.

http://forum.sbrforum.com/players-talk/216442-djokovic-vs-federer-post2142522.html#post2142522

[yisman]

I thought Del Potro would be the new number 1 but watching Murray he has the whole package and unreal court speed.

...

[jjgold]

2 majors
Gold medal
Dead on

[yisman]

Since you posted this four years ago, I don't think he's been ranked higher than third.

del Potro was never ranked higher than fourth.

[JustSomeCash]

NBA....Tennis....

This man talking bullshit anywhere, anytime....

just wow...each penetrating thread, not even close to shit, and has no clue

How can you be so disaster

[rankslash]

Since you posted this four years ago, I don't think he's been ranked higher than third.

del Potro was never ranked higher than fourth.

Murray was number 2 (behind Federer) in August 2009. He was 22 years old at the time.

[yisman]

Murray was number 2 (behind Federer) in August 2009. He was 22 years old at the time.

Yes, I am aware of that. Please re-read what I wrote.

[homie1975]

Djoko had 5 of his 6 slams while Andy was getting 2. Rafa had 4 of his 13 slams during that time

[matt1216]

Andy was number 2 in spring 2013

[yisman]

Still waiting on this and the other thread:

http://forum.sbrforum.com/players-talk/228582-welcome-new-number-1-tennis-player-next-year-del-petro-09-a.html

[EmpireMaker]

4 years

[Seto]

Looks like it may never happen for Andy.

I'm not too upset about it tbh, winning slams is way more important than being #1. The whole concept of being #1 was kinda ruined when we had a succession of losers being #1 in the WTA 3-5 years ago. I guess it still somewhat has prestige in the mens' game but I'd rather win 1 slam and be #3 for the year than make 3 slam finals and win 3 Masters 1000 and be #1 for the year (random example).

[jjgold]

I think Murray win 2 grand slams after I started this thread

Tsonga a failure his whole career

[yisman]

I think Murray win 2 grand slams after I started this thread

Tsonga a failure his whole career

It wasn't whether Murray will win a grand slam. I thought that was pretty obvious, and I said he would.

It was whether he'd be number 1. Much more difficult than winning a grand slam.

Looks like it may never happen for Andy.

I'm not too upset about it tbh, winning slams is way more important than being #1. The whole concept of being #1 was kinda ruined when we had a succession of losers being #1 in the WTA 3-5 years ago. I guess it still somewhat has prestige in the mens' game but I'd rather win 1 slam and be #3 for the year than make 3 slam finals and win 3 Masters 1000 and be #1 for the year (random example).

I'd probably rather win the GS, but the truth is it's more difficult to maintain excellence over a year (consistently reaching semis), than it is to win one GS tournament.


Before Federer/Nadal/Djokovic took over, you had several guys win a major without ever being number 1, and recently we've had del Potro and Murray.

[thirtytwo]

Still waiting on this and the other thread:

http://forum.sbrforum.com/players-ta...etro-09-a.html

del petro

[Seto]

I'd probably rather win the GS, but the truth is it's more difficult to maintain excellence over a year (consistently reaching semis), than it is to win one GS tournament.


Before Federer/Nadal/Djokovic took over, you had several guys win a major without ever being number 1, and recently we've had del Potro and Murray.

I somewhat agree but seeing Wozniacki be world number 1 for basically 2 years reaching 1 grand slam semi and 0 finals in those 2 years completely discredited the whole concept of being #1 for me (and people like Federer and Serena would agree with me). Not to mention all the other series of losers we had as #1s (Ivanovic, Jankovic...) Now I understand that's the WTA and only big time guys have been #1 in the ATP in recent memory but still, to me the rankings are pretty much just what determines who gets easier draws in slams.

[Seto]

I think Murray win 2 grand slams after I started this thread

Tsonga a failure his whole career

Yeah and he's still only 27 so I guess he has time.

Tsonga has become such a joke it's sad. Him and Berdych are the 2 biggest jokes on tour as of now.

[pavyracer]

I thought Del Potro would be the new number 1 but watching Murray he has the whole package and unreal court speed. Fed was hammering the corners and Murray got to most of him. If he won third set I think he would of won match.

What happened to Murray?

[Brock Landers]

What happened to Murray?

Hip injury, he accomplished a ton for a while

[beefcake]

Hey he beat Nick the dikk today.If he can beat Berrentini tomm he might be seeded for wimbledon!

[jjgold]

JJ you know the game

Thanks