Not a market trend exactly, more of a book trend. I get what your saying
In what sense? Books don't decide the odds on that 2-0 bet above for example. Not anymore Matt.
Punters do! On Betfair. And the books are influenced accordingly.
So how can that be "part of the trend"?
I do wish you the best though. Genuinely. If you are in fact betting real money this time I hope you're betting low stakes during this experimental stage.
Comment
matt1216
SBR Posting Legend
10-27-11
14683
#73
Originally posted by JC1186
In what sense? Books don't decide the odds on that 2-0 bet above for example. Not anymore Matt.
Punters do! On Betfair. And the books are influenced accordingly.
So how can that be "part of the trend"?
I do wish you the best though. Genuinely. If you are in fact betting real money this time I hope you're betting low stakes during this experimental stage.
I am, 2-2.25 units max, around 50$. It's actually been hitting decent.
Comment
matt1216
SBR Posting Legend
10-27-11
14683
#74
16. Thiem 1st set 2.25 x 2 units
Comment
matt1216
SBR Posting Legend
10-27-11
14683
#75
YTD: 9-7 +2.5 units
* I made a stupid decision on the Simon 1st set ML, and the over under between Davy/vessly missed by 1 game. 6-1 first set killed it. The first set total for the trend is 11-0 between my last two sets. I went against it with Thiem today... I figure with a set under Thiems belt in France, he would have the upper hand.
Comment
matt1216
SBR Posting Legend
10-27-11
14683
#76
17. Garcia 1st set winner 1.71 x 2 units
18. Vesley 1st set winner 1.87 x 2 units
GL
Comment
matt1216
SBR Posting Legend
10-27-11
14683
#77
19. Simon 1st set winner 1.87 x 2 units
Comment
matt1216
SBR Posting Legend
10-27-11
14683
#78
20. Keys 1st set Winner 1.71 x 2 units
GL
Comment
matt1216
SBR Posting Legend
10-27-11
14683
#79
21. Barthel 1st set winner 1.61 x 3 units
GL
Comment
matt1216
SBR Posting Legend
10-27-11
14683
#80
all of the plays part of the trend this morning.
Comment
matt1216
SBR Posting Legend
10-27-11
14683
#81
YTD: 13-8 +5.8 units
*4-1 today on the first set wager trends. Barthel was the lone loss 4-6..... Svitolina had the same starting 1st set ML as Istomin so maybe I'll take a look at that line as well.
GL
Comment
xauwatroi
SBR High Roller
09-07-13
187
#82
Can you post the plays a bit earlier matt? I missed those play lol. Thanks
Comment
matt1216
SBR Posting Legend
10-27-11
14683
#83
22. Bouchard 2-0 sets 1.67 x 2 units
23. Simon 1st set winner 1.70 x 2 units
GL
Comment
matt1216
SBR Posting Legend
10-27-11
14683
#84
Originally posted by xauwatroi
Can you post the plays a bit earlier matt? I missed those play lol. Thanks
Yeah sorry, was just waiting on books
Comment
matt1216
SBR Posting Legend
10-27-11
14683
#85
YTD: 14-9 +5.2 units
1-1 today.... Bouchard cruised through her match. Simon shit the bed. On to the next
GL
Comment
matt1216
SBR Posting Legend
10-27-11
14683
#86
24. Delbonis Over 111/2 Games won 1.80 x 2 units
25. Puig + Dellaqua/Barty Doubles 1.77 x 2 units
Comment
matt1216
SBR Posting Legend
10-27-11
14683
#87
26. Pliskova Over 10 games won 1.80 x 2 units
27. Puig 2-0 sets 2.10 x 2 units
Comment
matt1216
SBR Posting Legend
10-27-11
14683
#88
Play 25. Does not count***** I posted 3 mins after start time
Comment
SirtySree
SBR MVP
12-19-13
2370
#89
Play 25. Gotta love that typical WTA meltdown one game away from victory. Up a set and 5-1 to lose 6 games straight and then the match tiebreak. Happens over once every 10 matches in the WTA.
Comment
xauwatroi
SBR High Roller
09-07-13
187
#90
What does Over 111/2 in #24 mean?
Comment
kenz
SBR MVP
12-09-12
4879
#91
Originally posted by xauwatroi
What does Over 111/2 in #24 mean?
delboner to win at least 12 game, over 11.5
Comment
matt1216
SBR Posting Legend
10-27-11
14683
#92
Originally posted by SirtySree
Play 25. Gotta love that typical WTA meltdown one game away from victory. Up a set and 5-1 to lose 6 games straight and then the match tiebreak. Happens over once every 10 matches in the WTA.
I know right, WTA, what a rollercoaster
Comment
kenz
SBR MVP
12-09-12
4879
#93
Sh-t Last time I checked Barty/Dellacqua was toast. Wonder what was their ML when down 0-1 on sets and 1-5 in games
Comment
matt1216
SBR Posting Legend
10-27-11
14683
#94
Originally posted by kenz
Sh-t Last time I checked Barty/Dellacqua was toast. Wonder what was their ML when down 0-1 on sets and 1-5 in games
Yeah man, they were getting stomped, then out of nowhere won 6 games in a row
Comment
Hardcoar
SBR Posting Legend
02-17-13
15606
#95
I don't get this thread. What is your interpretation of its title, Matt??
Comment
matt1216
SBR Posting Legend
10-27-11
14683
#96
Originally posted by Hardcoar
I don't get this thread. What is your interpretation of its title, Matt??
There plays HC, when was my last trend play? 3 days ago. This thread was mainly for my trends, but I also want to post plays that I feel have a great chance. I'm not posting my usuall 10 a day lol. I've cut it down considerably.
Comment
Hardcoar
SBR Posting Legend
02-17-13
15606
#97
I don't understand what you mean by "There plays HC, ..." (honestly).
Are you saying the title only applies to a small portion of the bets posted within?
Wouldn't it be less misleading, and just generally speaking better to post the bets that don't apply to this thread, in another thread?
Comment
matt1216
SBR Posting Legend
10-27-11
14683
#98
YTD: 16-10 +8.5 units
Comment
matt1216
SBR Posting Legend
10-27-11
14683
#99
Originally posted by Hardcoar
I don't understand what you mean by "There plays HC, ..." (honestly).
Are you saying the title only applies to a small portion of the bets posted within?
Wouldn't it be less misleading, and just generally speaking better to post the bets that don't apply to this thread, in another thread?
I tried that, but I get shit on for making new threads... I figured I would just put an asterix by the plays that are part of my trend picks, mainly first setters.
Comment
Hardcoar
SBR Posting Legend
02-17-13
15606
#100
If anyone gives you shit for creating one new thread with good reason... f*ck 'em!
Comment
fitguy67
SBR Hall of Famer
03-13-11
5082
#101
solution:
1. use this NEW thread ONLY FOR the "few and far between" TREND PLAYS (to keep the result of this experiment clear...why you originally set it up)...to do so properly...figure out a "W-L, U" record for that small handout of plays that really belong here, post it...then carry on from there
2. as for all other garden-variety plays designed to make money more than test out an idea...
EITHER either go back to your previous thread = http://forum.sbrforum.com/tennis-bet...-picks-p4.html and update it with all the non-trend plays that have cluttered up this thread since its beginning (probably a big pain in the ass)... OR
start a new one at "0-0, 0u" and carry on from there...if anyone doesn't like it (almost always people who've never taken the trouble to run a thread themselves, let alone account for it accurately)...as HC says, fukk'em...
_________
u'v stored up enough "street cred" around this place to open threads whenever the hell you want...i just suggest that if you're interested in logging the progress of an idea, to the point that you're seriously curious enough about it to bother to set up a new thread to announce it...then, bloody-well keep the new thread restricted to those plays related to this new idea...then the "W-L, U" of the "new idea" thread will mean something and actually satisfy your curiosity
and lump all the plain-vanilla "plays to make money" in a separate thread with their own "W-L, U" that also means something
Comment
matt1216
SBR Posting Legend
10-27-11
14683
#102
Originally posted by fitguy67
solution:
1. use this NEW thread ONLY FOR the "few and far between" TREND PLAYS (to keep the result of this experiment clear...why you originally set it up)...to do so properly...figure out a "W-L, U" record for that small handout of plays that really belong here, post it...then carry on from there
2. as for all other garden-variety plays designed to make money more than test out an idea...
EITHER either go back to your previous thread = http://forum.sbrforum.com/tennis-bet...-picks-p4.html and update it with all the non-trend plays that have cluttered up this thread since its beginning (probably a big pain in the ass)... OR
start a new one at "0-0, 0u" and carry on from there...if anyone doesn't like it (almost always people who've never taken the trouble to run a thread themselves, let alone account for it accurately)...as HC says, fukk'em...
_________
u'v stored up enough "street cred" around this place to open threads whenever the hell you want...i just suggest that if you're interested in logging the progress of an idea, to the point that you're seriously curious enough about it to bother to set up a new thread to announce it...then, bloody-well keep the new thread restricted to those plays related to this new idea...then the "W-L, U" of the "new idea" thread will mean something and actually satisfy your curiosity
and lump all the plain-vanilla "plays to make money" in a separate thread with their own "W-L, U" that also means something
Thats a good idea. What I might just do is keep two records within the thread. One for regular plays one for trends. Thanks again Fitguy