5Dimes - "Bad line" dispute

[Justin7]

The wager was cancelled before the event. So there is no issue here. If it was cancelled after event started than you would be entitled to that price. Simple as that.

It's better that it was canceled before, than after. Then there is no free-roll risk. But books don't get a pass to void wagers just because it is pre-game.

[Justin7]

I'm simply stating every book, including 5Dimes, lists in their terms that they have the right to do exactly what they did here.

Books have the right to void a bet taken as a result an obvious error. Books do not have the right (nor does any decent book claim the right) to void any wager, as long as it is before the match.

[RickySteve]

I've had 5Dimes cancel many similar bets in the past. It's generally better to let Tony have his mulligans and keep pounding him in the shorts than dispute and get 86d.

[Justin7]

I've had 5Dimes cancel many similar bets in the past. It's generally better to let Tony have his mulligans and keep pounding him in the shorts than dispute and get 86d.

I wholly agree, especially when it is voided before the match begins. It might be a party foul, but you lose a lot more EV by bitching about Tony than you would gain by having the voided wager reinstated.

[wrongturn]

the bet lost, so withdraw the complain already.

[bobbywaves]

Only 5 Dimes offers alternative -2.5 run lines? Not true, Bookmaker/DSI has them.

[Vaughany]

the bet lost, so withdraw the complain already.

hahah

[ForgetWallStreet]

Only 5 Dimes offers alternative -2.5 run lines? Not true, Bookmaker/DSI has them.

They don't offer them for underdogs.

[Legions36]

5dimes is good why talk sh-it?