What good books would you like to see rated by SBR?

[redski22]

in every case SBOBET.

[robmpink]

Definately agree that Heritage deserves a bump to A- or A.

Ive dabbled in a book called Northbet...They actually seem pretty good.

I've dabbled with them as well, hesitant at first, but things are ok with Northbet.

[Coldpimpin]

I still like Sportsbooks.com, (not Sportsbook.com). I haven't had to fax them documentation in over 2 years now. It did take a month to get paid recently but they paid. Bodog should wake up and stop making long time customers fax in documents for every new withdrawal. Me no play with them no more!

[HedgeHog]

how can you rate a book which selectively chooses who can play ?

With this criteria, then MB and Pinny should be unrated--they choose to shun Americans. Personally I think this argument is ridic. It's much more important that they pay--could care less who they accept. That said, Heritage is a better Book than MB and almost as good as Pinny (financially speaking).

[dark star]

Betislands & Betm&m

[Hareeba!]

With this criteria, then MB and Pinny should be unrated--they choose to shun Americans. Personally I think this argument is ridic. It's much more important that they pay--could care less who they accept. That said, Heritage is a better Book than MB and almost as good as Pinny (financially speaking).

don't blame Pinnacle, Matchbook, Betfair etc for not allowing Americans to play when doing so could result in your government slamming the owners in gaol.

what justification does Heritage have for not permitting me to open an account there?

[HedgeHog]

don't blame Pinnacle, Matchbook, Betfair etc for not allowing Americans to play when doing so could result in your government slamming the owners in gaol.

what justification does Heritage have for not permitting me to open an account there?

You miss the point. All Books have the right to choose who they allow--for whatever reason. And this should have absolutely no bearing on their rating.

[Hareeba!]

You miss the point. All Books have the right to choose who they allow--for whatever reason. And this should have absolutely no bearing on their rating.

Other than Heritage I think there are only a couple which do that?

Sure they might have the "right" if they are permitted to make the rules but there's no "right" in unjustified discriminatory practices. In several countries such discrimination would be illegal.

[robmpink]

Betislands & Betm&m

They got on the betislands train. C something. What I don't understand is their website says something like paying people since 1994. Hmmmmm, one guy steps in and now after 12 some years they are rated? I'm not knocking the book, but I don't get it.

[robmpink]

Other than Heritage I think there are only a couple which do that?

Sure they might have the "right" if they are permitted to make the rules but there's no "right" in unjustified discriminatory practices. In several countries such discrimination would be illegal.

I know northbet isn't heritage, but they told me they are invite only, at this point.

[HedgeHog]

Other than Heritage I think there are only a couple which do that?

Sure they might have the "right" if they are permitted to make the rules but there's no "right" in unjustified discriminatory practices. In several countries such discrimination would be illegal.

Who exactly are they discriminating against? Name them and bring a class action lawsuit against this "evil biggot" named Heritage. Didn't realize I was betting with the KKK.

[HedgeHog]

I know northbet isn't heritage, but they told me they are invite only, at this point.

You can thank Cory1111 for that. They are trying to weed out scam artists.

[cory1111]

thats funny i was invited at heritage, we all cant be an honest moron like u hedgehog.

[xstud]

You can thank Cory1111 for that. They are trying to weed out scam artists.

Thanks cory. The reason why processors fall and books tighten restrictions is because of people like you. Do you ever see the books that you do charge backs with come on a forum and bash you? Do you realize that when you charge back a book the damage it truly does?

[cory1111]

must be another busy night at Ez. do ever see what people like Alex Powers does to sportsbooks. The reason we have SBR and OSGA excluding fixed forums such as RX , are because of sportsbooks like you.

[xstud]

must be another busy night at Ez. do ever see what people like Alex Powers does to sportsbooks. The reason we have SBR and OSGA excluding fixed forums such as RX , are because of sportsbooks like you.

Must not be a busy night for you huh? Cause nobody will take your action. Time to start hitting up the D- rated books for the next possible chargebacks.

[HedgeHog]

thats funny i was invited at heritage, we all cant be an honest moron like u hedgehog.

Now there's the admission I've been waiting for Cory. Either you're an honest moron (your words) or a smart cheater like yourself. Can't win unless you know how to scam--right? The more you post, the more I don't mind EZ screwing you. How'd you hustle Northbet, buddy? And you got SBR to do all your dirty work on that one. Pure genius! How smart are you feeling now with your current hustle. This one is ending badly, Cory--no matter how many threads you start.

[cory1111]

that would be easystreetsports.com then d-, can i use some of my 46,000 dollars please
?

[HedgeHog]

I've seen some requests for SBObet. What other books do you think SBR should list at A- or higher?

Your thread got hijacked by the EZ scandel; I apologize for any part I inadvertently played in it. Back to topic, what keeps Heritage from breaking through the A ceiling? Is it, as has been suggested, their selectiveness in choosing their clientele?

[MarlinsFan2212]

Bodog from an A to B+
Worse book than Justbet and Heritage. (except Justbet has really low betting limits.)

[vitalyo]

HedgeHog
robmpink
xstud

Guys you can sign up with Northbet here https://www.northbet.com/join
It's all good .
I would recommend you to blame Cory for bet911 and parleymakers fiasco .
Heritage sportsbook won't take me ! Any advice from you on whom should i blame ?

LOL.

[justonetime]

Have to agree with everyone that said SBObet. A+

[jozomir]

188bet,sbobet,betdaq

[Fishhead]

188.bet

[Fishhead]

Definately agree that Heritage deserves a bump to A- or A.

Ive dabbled in a book called Northbet...They actually seem pretty good.

[Fishhead]

Heritage deserves a small raise from B+ to A- IMO

[tofuman]

How about betmaker? With Matchbook out of picture for US players, many want/have moved there, seems like they should be reviewed.

i second this.

[VTranX]

how can you rate a book which selectively chooses who can play ?

agreed

[HedgeHog]

agreed

Disagree. If you own a Book, you have every right to choose your clientele and their limits.

[halleBB]

Disagree. If you own a Book, you have every right to choose your clientele and their limits.

That's true but then you'll have only complaints from users who don't have access to your Book, so you'll get bad reviews, e.g. ibcbet- is the best bookmaker I've used until now but due to their register restriction, or some unlucky customers and fraud agents, everyone is complaining about them (that's why you should use a master agent as asianconnect or bet-ibc, instead of ones that have customer support and contact detail on free email services).

[Scooter]

If you are rating/reviewing SBO Bet, take note of the micro limits for many of their non-Soccer offerings.

[hankcream]

Any rating on GTBets (formerly VIP) they gave me $100 fp that I pissed away, but they seemed like a decent 4th or 5th out.

[RonPaul2008]

Lowvig.com

[tommygun]

I'm all for the agreement that heritage should not be an A book.

They only let losers play there.

[RonPaul2008]

I'm all for the agreement that heritage should not be an A book.

They only let losers play there.

Not true.