Why is Wagerweb a C grade after scamming people???

[Thremp]

Waiting 60 wagers is ridiculous. Taking this type of shot and expecting no consequences is equally ridiculous.

[louis]

They'll soon be at D or lower

It won't be long before they are at D or lower, anyhow. Any sportsbook that holds a player responsible for their management, is not going to remain at C or higher for too long. There is absolutely nothing wrong with taking this type of shot. If the book allows a bet, and it is advantageous, it is not the players job to refrain from making the bet. This argument by wagerweb is absolutely ridiculous and outrageous and they will soon be out of business, I hope.

[michael777]

they stole $3,000 from me a few weeks ago,**** THEM!!

[Rand790]

WagerWeb is awful - they stole $42,000 from me!

Keep away from them!

[Thremp]

Because they are far far far better than most D+ books?

[bigboydan]

I Am Still Confused Why Sbr Has Wagerweb A C Grade? Are You Joking Me? Wagerweb Should Be At Least Lower Than A D+.

I have nothing to do with the SBR ratings at all. So needless to say I can't answer that question at all.

[datek23]

I Am Still Confused Why Sbr Has Wagerweb A C Grade? Are You Joking Me? Wagerweb Should Be At Least Lower Than A D+.

[bigboydan]

maybe the player found a loophole in their system. Why is the player at fault? Wagerweb should have been on top of their game for this to happen. AS i RECALL ON TAXES AND EVERYTHING ELSE, lOOPHOLES ARE TECHNICALLY LEGAL

Yes, The player did find a loophole in the s/w. However, I agree 100% with you in regards of the "on top of their game" part.

As Justin did point out before though. From his observations at some of the offshore books he's vistited, he said that those clerks are bored and don't care if a player past posts (something to that effect). If that is the case...Then clearly it's WagerWeb's fault for hiring customer service reps, and should be held liable for their actions.

[datek23]

We pretty much covered this case from top to bottom in this thread.

I agree the player should be paid and all, however make no mistake about it that he was a shot taker. Then again WagerWeb took the ultimate shot.

maybe the player found a loophole in their system. Why is the player at fault? Wagerweb should have been on top of their game for this to happen. AS i RECALL ON TAXES AND EVERYTHING ELSE, lOOPHOLES ARE TECHNICALLY LEGAL

[bigboydan]

We pretty much covered this case from top to bottom in this thread.

I agree the player should be paid and all, however make no mistake about it that he was a shot taker. Then again WagerWeb took the ultimate shot.

[SBR Lou]

SBR is well respected and a great site, they have more power than they think in forcing sportbooks to pay.

They're well aware of their influence.

[Thremp]

Umm... Theres a solid argument in that case about the player scamming.

Wagerweb should clearly play, but the player is not beyond repute for his behavior.

[datek23]

After over 35k being stolen by Wagerweb why in the world did they get downgrades from B- to C? Something like this means this company is in major trouble, Wagerweb. SBR should give it a grade at least D+. To many sportbooks are suckering people and SBR has not taken a strong stance like they used to on these scamming sportbooks. SBR is well respected and a great site, they have more power than they think in forcing sportbooks to pay.