Unfair behaviour from Betonline

[pimike]

YW... "A" book that is very quick to limit and slow, tedious way of processing payouts. There's no reason for them to be so slow and have such low payout limits. If they think they're getting people to blow their balances in the mean time, OK maybe, but people wise up to that and then it backfires because bettors will withdraw as soon as they win a bet because they know if they keep winning they can't get it all out at once if they want.

BetUS has incredible promos, fantastic payouts, great odds if you pay attention, but will limit you if you bet a good # and win (but not if you lose lol). Very underrated book. Why do you think they'll fold aside from the fact they're a smaller shop?

Years of bad reputation. Nobody is promoting them. Where they going to get new customers after this?

[Jared Brooks]

If you're talking about Nitrogen in particular, I wasn't aware of any reason to play there since they copy Pinn but add vig. I can imagine some reasons for other types of bettors, but not me.

Well limit bets move the lines at Pinnacle, so you could hit Pinnacle and Nitrogen simultaneously. Not sure if that qualifies as "chasing steam", which is a pretty amorphous concept to me.

I just don't see any reason for a book to be a BTC book. It transfers the currency risk to the bettor and rec bettors consistently hate that. Most want to bet on sports, not a currency. A competent book manager can easily assume that risk and either assume some of it or hedge it entirely. BTC is fantastic for funding books, but there's no reason to have the bets denominated in BTC.

Yeah, well said. The problem for me is I'm running out of fiat books that I feel comfortable with. Maybe I should try some of those that you listed. The problem is I doubt they can match the limits of Nitrogen/Fairlay/Cloudbet/Betcoin.