Drain the Swamp

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Nitrogen
    SBR MVP
    • 08-15-16
    • 1972

    #1
    Drain the Swamp
    As of today

    Department of Defense is being run by a Boeing executive
    Health Services being run by a Pharmacy lobbyist
    The EPA is being run by a Coal lobbyist
    Dept of Interior being run by an Oil lobbyist
  • khicks26
    SBR Aristocracy
    • 09-16-06
    • 44208

    #2
    Trump drained the swam & found his cabinet on the bottom.
    Comment
    • brooks85
      SBR Aristocracy
      • 01-05-09
      • 44644

      #3
      Originally posted by Nitrogen
      As of today

      Department of Defense is being run by a Boeing executive
      Health Services being run by a Pharmacy lobbyist
      The EPA is being run by a Coal lobbyist
      Dept of Interior being run by an Oil lobbyist
      and things are going great as proven by the data and you have no idea what I'm talking about. Trends.
      Comment
      • keely85
        SBR MVP
        • 01-04-15
        • 4296

        #4
        Dude. There’s scandals and cronyism is tons of departments now. 100 ppl have already left their posts. Let’s not say things are going well bc the markets are up.
        Comment
        • brooks85
          SBR Aristocracy
          • 01-05-09
          • 44644

          #5
          Originally posted by keely85
          Dude. There’s scandals and cronyism is tons of departments now. 100 ppl have already left their posts. Let’s not say things are going well bc the markets are up.
          so one watches too much MSM


          notice you believe in global warming too.

          Trends man, trends. Gotta learn to spot them if you want to win at life.
          Comment
          • keely85
            SBR MVP
            • 01-04-15
            • 4296

            #6
            So someone like Zinke was just setup by MSM?
            Comment
            • brooks85
              SBR Aristocracy
              • 01-05-09
              • 44644

              #7
              Originally posted by keely85
              So someone like Zinke was just setup by MSM?
              oh no, another guy they will investigate and find nothing related to what they started the investigation for!!

              man you really got me there!


              it's almost like people in government have lied before.. crazy right??!?!?
              Comment
              • DwightShrute
                SBR Aristocracy
                • 01-17-09
                • 101240

                #8
                Originally posted by Nitrogen
                As of today

                Department of Defense is being run by a Boeing executive
                Health Services being run by a Pharmacy lobbyist
                The EPA is being run by a Coal lobbyist
                Dept of Interior being run by an Oil lobbyist
                better than the last 2 decades .
                Comment
                • khicks26
                  SBR Aristocracy
                  • 09-16-06
                  • 44208

                  #9
                  Originally posted by DwightShrute
                  better than the last 2 decades .
                  OH Thank God your here. Brooks has been making a mess of the place.

                  Can you do something about that?
                  Comment
                  • vitterd
                    Restricted User
                    • 09-14-17
                    • 59265

                    #10
                    Originally posted by khicks26
                    OH Thank God your here. Brooks has been making a mess of the place.

                    Can you do something about that?
                    Lmao. How bad is brooks when dopey Dwight is a happy sight
                    Comment
                    • keely85
                      SBR MVP
                      • 01-04-15
                      • 4296

                      #11
                      Off the top of my head Lewandowski, that dude who was banging Hope Hicks that beat his girlfriends, Hope Hicks for a slew of things, Hatch Acts against Conway/Sanders/Ivanka, Ivanka getting relief on her sweatshops in China, Ivanka (and all trumps for not being fully divested from businesses), Old Wilbur selling stocks he claimed he didn’t have, Pruitt sending money on dumb shit like trips and soundproof booths to not work in (that other congressman who blamed his wife for spending his campaign money I know that’s not on trump but I love that story)

                      Then in regards to crimes your obvious players like Manafort/Stone/Flynn, Epstein and his sex workers (by extension Alan Dershowitz trumps biggest legal defender) Trumps businesses committing fraud the past 3 decades, Fred Trump, Kushner in regards to the Middle East (pick any of his crimes that prob happened from murder to money laundering)

                      I’m sure more will come to me but these are just a few things that MSM didn’t just report on but are actual investigations. So not sure how that isn’t real?
                      Comment
                      • brooks85
                        SBR Aristocracy
                        • 01-05-09
                        • 44644

                        #12
                        Originally posted by keely85
                        Off the top of my head Lewandowski, that dude who was banging Hope Hicks that beat his girlfriends, Hope Hicks for a slew of things, Hatch Acts against Conway/Sanders/Ivanka, Ivanka getting relief on her sweatshops in China, Ivanka (and all trumps for not being fully divested from businesses), Old Wilbur selling stocks he claimed he didn’t have, Pruitt sending money on dumb shit like trips and soundproof booths to not work in (that other congressman who blamed his wife for spending his campaign money I know that’s not on trump but I love that story)

                        Then in regards to crimes your obvious players like Manafort/Stone/Flynn, Epstein and his sex workers (by extension Alan Dershowitz trumps biggest legal defender) Trumps businesses committing fraud the past 3 decades, Fred Trump, Kushner in regards to the Middle East (pick any of his crimes that prob happened from murder to money laundering)

                        I’m sure more will come to me but these are just a few things that MSM didn’t just report on but are actual investigations. So not sure how that isn’t real?
                        so you have nothing important here. Check.

                        then you have guys who got in trouble FOR NOTHING THEY WERE ORIGINALLY investigated for.
                        Comment
                        • keely85
                          SBR MVP
                          • 01-04-15
                          • 4296

                          #13
                          Zinke 100% gave relief to lobbyists and things that benefitting himself. Wtf are you talking about “they didn’t investigate for that”. It was the exact thing they looked for and easily found? Honestly what are you talking about
                          Comment
                          • keely85
                            SBR MVP
                            • 01-04-15
                            • 4296

                            #14
                            Lol so what were they originally looking at Manafort for? It’s hard to know with the 30 different things he’s indicted for directly relating to trump.
                            Comment
                            • keely85
                              SBR MVP
                              • 01-04-15
                              • 4296

                              #15
                              Originally posted by brooks85
                              so you have nothing important here. Check.

                              then you have guys who got in trouble FOR NOTHING THEY WERE ORIGINALLY investigated for.
                              You have people using their positions for personal gain? Check.
                              Comment
                              • brooks85
                                SBR Aristocracy
                                • 01-05-09
                                • 44644

                                #16
                                Originally posted by keely85
                                Lol so what were they originally looking at Manafort for? It’s hard to know with the 30 different things he’s indicted for directly relating to trump.
                                they were very clear. You should have been paying attention.

                                And where did they land?

                                exactly.
                                Comment
                                • keely85
                                  SBR MVP
                                  • 01-04-15
                                  • 4296

                                  #17
                                  So let’s say they didn’t find what they started looking for with Manafort. You saying it’s okay he did all the other crimes he did?
                                  Comment
                                  • khicks26
                                    SBR Aristocracy
                                    • 09-16-06
                                    • 44208

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by vitterd
                                    Lmao. How bad is brooks when dopey Dwight is a happy sight
                                    I know right. Like an old friend coming home from war.
                                    Comment
                                    • brooks85
                                      SBR Aristocracy
                                      • 01-05-09
                                      • 44644

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by keely85
                                      So let’s say they didn’t find what they started looking for with Manafort. You saying it’s okay he did all the other crimes he did?
                                      I'm saying what he did has been done by nearly everyone at that level which is why sheep like you took the bait.


                                      So it 100% matters. They started investigation with NO evidence.
                                      Comment
                                      • keely85
                                        SBR MVP
                                        • 01-04-15
                                        • 4296

                                        #20
                                        Here I find myself saying the same facts and actual things that are happening in real life. And Brooks laughs them away as if happening in Narnia or something. Maybe if he laughs hard enough the indictments and investigations will go away?
                                        Comment
                                        • vitterd
                                          Restricted User
                                          • 09-14-17
                                          • 59265

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by khicks26
                                          I know right. Like an old friend coming home from war.
                                          Ehhhh....friend is a stretch....weirdo sitting in his garage you got used to just being there in the morning is more like it.
                                          Comment
                                          • brooks85
                                            SBR Aristocracy
                                            • 01-05-09
                                            • 44644

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by keely85
                                            Here I find myself saying the same facts and actual things that are happening in real life. And Brooks laughs them away as if happening in Narnia or something. Maybe if he laughs hard enough the indictments and investigations will go away?
                                            says the sheep who just proved my point


                                            Originally posted by brooks85
                                            oh no, another guy they will investigate and find nothing related to what they started the investigation for!!

                                            man you really got me there!


                                            it's almost like people in government have lied before.. crazy right??!?!?
                                            Comment
                                            • keely85
                                              SBR MVP
                                              • 01-04-15
                                              • 4296

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by brooks85
                                              I'm saying what he did has been done by nearly everyone at that level which is why sheep like you took the bait.


                                              So it 100% matters. They started investigation with NO evidence.
                                              So you’re saying they just went “ummm this guy! Let’s hope he did something bad”

                                              And in no way had any reason to suspect Manafort for any crimes?
                                              Just clarifying
                                              Comment
                                              • brooks85
                                                SBR Aristocracy
                                                • 01-05-09
                                                • 44644

                                                #24
                                                Originally posted by keely85
                                                So you’re saying they just went “ummm this guy! Let’s hope he did something bad”

                                                And in no way had any reason to suspect Manafort for any crimes?
                                                Just clarifying
                                                exactly. Were you not watching the news as this happened? Any angle they could take at trump. Fact.

                                                how is it you just started posting about this today?


                                                again, trends man. They say a lot about you sheepy.
                                                Comment
                                                • khicks26
                                                  SBR Aristocracy
                                                  • 09-16-06
                                                  • 44208

                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by vitterd
                                                  Ehhhh....friend is a stretch....weirdo sitting in his garage you got used to just being there in the morning is more like it.
                                                  LOL
                                                  Comment
                                                  • keely85
                                                    SBR MVP
                                                    • 01-04-15
                                                    • 4296

                                                    #26
                                                    Originally posted by brooks85
                                                    exactly. Where you not watching the news as this happened?

                                                    how is it you just started posting about this today?
                                                    Just checking. Literally all/any lawyers would probably disagree with you. The smocking gun (as DT calls it) is not a thing. The amount of evidence to bring 30+ charges against a person would disagree with you. But what do I know? I am not a blogger.
                                                    Comment
                                                    • brooks85
                                                      SBR Aristocracy
                                                      • 01-05-09
                                                      • 44644

                                                      #27
                                                      Originally posted by keely85
                                                      Just checking. Literally all/any lawyers would probably disagree with you. The smocking gun (as DT calls it) is not a thing. The amount of evidence to bring 30+ charges against a person would disagree with you. But what do I know? I am not a blogger.
                                                      no they wouldnt which is why countless were on CNBC saying exactly what I said.


                                                      Again, nice work proving you're a sheep who only watches MSM. Fact


                                                      don't be a coward and answer the question; how is it you just started posting about this today?

                                                      I know how. You were not paying attention before and now you're just repeating old MSM articles lol
                                                      Comment
                                                      • keely85
                                                        SBR MVP
                                                        • 01-04-15
                                                        • 4296

                                                        #28
                                                        I’m sorry was he NOT guilty on all the first wave of charges? Oh maybe one was not confirmed bc an admitted MAGA wouldn’t agree on 1 of the first 15 charges. But I’m sure Paul will fare better next time in court.
                                                        Comment
                                                        • keely85
                                                          SBR MVP
                                                          • 01-04-15
                                                          • 4296

                                                          #29
                                                          Please post all these lawyers (other than Alan Dershowitz) they agree with you.
                                                          Comment
                                                          • brooks85
                                                            SBR Aristocracy
                                                            • 01-05-09
                                                            • 44644

                                                            #30
                                                            Originally posted by keely85
                                                            Please post all these lawyers (other than Alan Dershowitz) they agree with you.
                                                            how can I post something that happened LIVE ON TV you clown lol


                                                            try using google you fool

                                                            again; don't be a coward and answer the question; how is it you just started posting about this today?

                                                            I know how. You were not paying attention before and now you're just repeating old MSM articles lol
                                                            Comment
                                                            • vitterd
                                                              Restricted User
                                                              • 09-14-17
                                                              • 59265

                                                              #31
                                                              Originally posted by brooks85
                                                              no they wouldnt which is why countless were on CNBC saying exactly what I said.


                                                              Again, nice work proving you're a sheep who only watches MSM. Fact


                                                              don't be a coward and answer the question; how is it you just started posting about this today?

                                                              I know how. You were not paying attention before and now you're just repeating old MSM articles lol
                                                              Wait?? You are quoting CNBC? Aren’t they the enemy that always lie? Can you tell us when main stream media is telling the truth and when they aren’t?

                                                              Do you know how dumb you sound?
                                                              Comment
                                                              • keely85
                                                                SBR MVP
                                                                • 01-04-15
                                                                • 4296

                                                                #32
                                                                LMAO

                                                                brooks in all threads: “show me data”

                                                                Brooks in this thread: “ I can’t prove what I said. You go google it”

                                                                Lmao broke dik
                                                                Comment
                                                                • brooks85
                                                                  SBR Aristocracy
                                                                  • 01-05-09
                                                                  • 44644

                                                                  #33
                                                                  Originally posted by vitterd
                                                                  Wait?? You are quoting CNBC? Aren’t they the enemy that always lie? Can you tell us when main stream media is telling the truth and when they aren’t?

                                                                  Do you know how dumb you sound?
                                                                  told you day 1 all I need to do is get you posting and youll prove youre an idiot. CNBC is the BEST channel for real news, bar none.

                                                                  nice work idiot!!



                                                                  Originally Posted by vitterd
                                                                  250 is the limit insured you dummy and rich people will spread out between two accounts and earn 5 percent you dipshit. Plenty of us do just that.




                                                                  lying broke dick fuk
                                                                  Comment
                                                                  • brooks85
                                                                    SBR Aristocracy
                                                                    • 01-05-09
                                                                    • 44644

                                                                    #34
                                                                    Originally posted by keely85
                                                                    LMAO

                                                                    brooks in all threads: “show me data”

                                                                    Brooks in this thread: “ I can’t prove what I said. You go google it”

                                                                    Lmao broke dik
                                                                    notice how Ive forced you to post like a moron just like vitter


                                                                    trends man
                                                                    Comment
                                                                    • keely85
                                                                      SBR MVP
                                                                      • 01-04-15
                                                                      • 4296

                                                                      #35
                                                                      Lmao go google my answer hahah

                                                                      When asked to prove your point u penetrating caved. Gtfo moron
                                                                      Comment
                                                                      Search
                                                                      Collapse
                                                                      SBR Contests
                                                                      Collapse
                                                                      Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                                                                      Collapse
                                                                      Working...