I did prove the 100k to be a loan & not a gift, by waiting to see if Tat was going to return the 100k or keep his gift. If Tat didn't return the 100k, I would have honored the wager. By me already knowing it was a loan & not a gift, I knew it was just a matter of time before Tat crumbles & returns the 100k to Downmouth. When Tat eventually paid back the 100k loan, then Downmouth was able to pay dngf the 13k loan he solicited from him.
Not having access to Tat's PM's, forced me to gather this evidence in another simple way:
If Tat didn't return the 100k in a years time, then I would agree the 100k was truly a pathetic gift to win a 72k bet. Netting Downmouth a 28k loss.
But when Tat returned the 100k like I knew he would, that made the poorly disguised gift an obvious loan. Which unfortunately broke the no loan rule, voiding the wager.
The thread by Downmouth only demonstrated what a loser the guy is. By ignorantly attempting to extort 72k from Waves, with his pathetic attempt to circumvent rule in our bet. Tat was so ashamed of Downmouth's disgusting cheating attempt, the poor guy repaid his 100k loan & left the forum.