OBAMA DESERVES to be RELECTED

[MUHerd37]

That's funny, because your post alluded to measures in place after 9/11.

Apparently, only people who "look Arab" could possibly be a threat. Right?

Actually I said "Had more attention been paid to the middle easterners that hijacked the planes, the ACLU would file suits of racial profiling. Apparently you can't profile against people who want to attack you."

That was before the attacks, not after. You can't profile against the hijackers after they already blew the shit up.

[crustyme]

You can't just focus on middle eastern men! You will be sued by the ACLU and CAIR.

so when clinton received a memo warning of middle eastern men hijacking planes, he ordered the searching of 90 year olds and babies instead?

[MonkeyF0cker]

Pilot cabin locked and unavailable to passangers. Easy to do. You dont see police front seat available to rear end passengers, do you?

That only solves certain attacks.

I see people in the front seat of taxis all the time.

[MonkeyF0cker]

Actually I said "Had more attention been paid to the middle easterners that hijacked the planes, the ACLU would file suits of racial profiling. Apparently you can't profile against people who want to attack you."

That was before the attacks, not after. You can't profile against the hijackers after they already blew the shit up.

Uhh.

SANCTIONED BIAS: Racial Profiling Since 9/11
Search for that. If Arabs are threatening to blow up an airplane you must of course search a 90 year woman in a wheelchair and a 1 year olds' diaper. Just don't question any that looks Arab. Don't forget CAIR as well.

What now?

[probettor1]

That only solves certain attacks.

I see people in the front seat of taxis all the time.

There are more people in a walmart store that in an airplane, are you going to search every one entering to a walmart store?

[MonkeyF0cker]

There are more people in a walmart store that in an airplane, are you going to search every one entering to a walmart store?

Well, you either want good security or you don't. You can't just search blacks that come into and out of Walmart and say that you have good security.

Personally, I think it's all just overblown, reactionary garbage. I'd be perfectly fine with pre-9/11 levels of security.

[MUHerd37]

Uhh.



What now?

Yes that was talking about the ACLU and CAIR filing lawsuits over racial profiling since 9/11.

[probettor1]

Well, you either want good security or you don't. You can't just search blacks that come into and out of Walmart and say that you have good security.

Personally, I think it's all just overblown, reactionary garbage. I'd be perfectly fine with pre-9/11 security.

Dont be so sensitive, stats apply.

[MonkeyF0cker]

Yes that was talking about the ACLU and CAIR filing lawsuits over racial profiling since 9/11.

Wow. Really?

That's funny, because your post alluded to measures in place after 9/11.

Apparently, only people who "look Arab" could possibly be a threat. Right?

[MonkeyF0cker]

Dont be so sensitive, stats apply.

Right. White people don't steal from Walmart.

[probettor1]

If you are looking for ilegal entry to USA, cubans and mexicans are priority. Stealing in walmart: check the stats.

[MUHerd37]

Wow. Really?

What the fukk are you talking about? Nothing you are trying to say makes sense at all.

[probettor1]

If you are looking for ilegal entry to USA, cubans and mexicans are priority. Stealing in walmart: check the stats.

is about stats, preventing a 95% and spending 90% less money might be wise.

[MonkeyF0cker]

If you are looking for ilegal entry to USA, cubans and mexicans are priority. Stealing in walmart: check the stats.

Where are the stats? I wasn't aware that Walmart made public record of the race of suspected or even convicted thieves.

[MonkeyF0cker]

What the fukk are you talking about? Nothing you are trying to say makes sense at all.

You can't speak English?

You're defending racially profiling people for "security." My original question is in the last sentence of the post below. If you can't make sense of it, I can't help you.

That's funny, because your post alluded to measures in place after 9/11.

Apparently, only people who "look Arab" could possibly be a threat. Right?

[MUHerd37]

You can't speak English?

You're defending racially profiling people for "security." My original question is in the last sentence of the post below. If you can't make sense of it, I can't help you.

I made 2 posts about before and after 9/11. You apparently can't understand that. Racial profiling is necessary. If Arabs are wanting to blow up planes, you concentrate on Arabs. Exactly who else has been blowing up planes? If there is information saying a whit supremacy group is trying to blow up planes then you concentrate on people who look like they fit that part. It's pretty simple.

[MonkeyF0cker]

Still waiting on those stats, probettor. Surely, you must have a quick link (outside of KKK.com).

[probettor1]

moneyfocker are you black? you are getting the profiling thing too seriously.

[probettor1]

I said check the stats, you are a white hater black. Arent you?

[probettor1]

There is no racist people in usa any more, we elected a black. Stop whinning.

[MonkeyF0cker]

I made 2 posts about before and after 9/11. You apparently can't understand that. Racial profiling is necessary. If Arabs are wanting to blow up planes, you concentrate on Arabs. Exactly who else has been blowing up planes? If there is information saying a whit supremacy group is trying to blow up planes then you concentrate on people who look like they fit that part.

No. You apparently can't understand English. My post explicitly said AFTER 9/11. Is it that hard for you to understand?

Securing an airport does not mean concentrating on anything or anyone. EVERYONE is a potential threat. Racially profiling is a good way to MISS THE THREAT. Why on Earth do you assume that because Arabs have hijacked planes that they're the only threat in the future? It's idiotic, backwards, reactionary drivel.

[MonkeyF0cker]

I said check the stats, you are a white hater black. Arent you?

I'm trying to check the stats, but you're not giving them to me.

Where are they?

[MonkeyF0cker]

I said check the stats, you are a white hater black. Arent you?

You're really close.

You're a very bright, insightful person, probettor.

[crustyme]

I made 2 posts about before and after 9/11. You apparently can't understand that. Racial profiling is necessary. If Arabs are wanting to blow up planes, you concentrate on Arabs. Exactly who else has been blowing up planes? If there is information saying a whit supremacy group is trying to blow up planes then you concentrate on people who look like they fit that part. It's pretty simple.

two words: timothy mcveigh

still waiting on how clinton was able to get away with his increased airport security yet bush was too frightened of aclu to institute his.

[MUHerd37]

No. You apparently can't understand English. My post explicitly said AFTER 9/11. Is it that hard for you to understand?

Securing an airport does not mean concentrating on anything or anyone. EVERYONE is a potential threat. Racially profiling is a good way to MISS THE THREAT. Why on Earth do you assume that because Arabs have hijacked planes that they're the only threat in the future? It's idiotic, backwards, reactionary drivel.

Who the fukk else is blowing up planes? Lockerbie, 9/11, and 2 attempts since 9/11. All Muslims. No white or black people blowing up planes. No Asians blowing up planes. No 1 year old kids hiding bombs in their diapers. If you have information on a certain group wanting to do something, you profile that group. The memo said that Bin Laden wanted to hijack planes so Arabs should have been profiled. Muslim crazy asses still want to commit terrorist attacks so we should profile them. Why are we checking 1 year olds?

[probettor1]

who cares man, the stats might change from place to place, maybe in texas are mexican, in miami black people and in arizona americans stealing in walmart. The stats count. That's it.

[MUHerd37]

two words: timothy mcveigh

still waiting on how clinton was able to get away with his increased airport security yet bush was too frightened of aclu to institute his.

If we had information pointing to someone like McVeigh don't you think we should have profiled for someone like him? When did Clinton use profiling?

[probettor1]

moneyfocker might be arab too. Those are motherfockers no matter the stats but they dont steal in walmart, they blow air planes.

[probettor1]

If you see a cuban 30 miles from USA do you think he is a lost fisherman or a possible illegal alien? What if you see an american 30 miles from cuba?

[MonkeyF0cker]

Who the fukk else is blowing up planes? Lockerbie, 9/11, and 2 attempts since 9/11. All Muslims. No white or black people blowing up planes. No Asians blowing up planes. No 1 year old kids hiding bombs in their diapers. If you have information on a certain group wanting to do something, you profile that group. The memo said that Bin Laden wanted to hijack planes so Arabs should have been profiled. Muslim crazy asses still want to commit terrorist attacks so we should profile them. Why are we checking 1 year olds?

Uhh. We're well past the memo. It's 2012 in case you haven't noticed. So, you can quit going back to that nonsense.

Everyone should be checked with equal probability or nobody at all. Period.

Just because you only know about Arabs hijacking planes doesn't make it true.

Educate yourself if you're going to speak about topics.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_aircraft_hijackings

[MonkeyF0cker]

If you see a cuban 30 miles from USA do you think he is a lost fisherman or a possible illegal alien? What if you see an american 30 miles from cuba?

How do you know he's Cuban?

[MonkeyF0cker]

moneyfocker might be arab too. Those are motherfockers no matter the stats but they dont steal in walmart, they blow air planes.

Might be. Might not. Never know.

I've never been to an SBR Bash or had my picture taken.

[MUHerd37]

Uhh. We're well past the memo. It's 2012 in case you haven't noticed. So, you can quit going back to that nonsense.

Everyone should be checked with equal probability or nobody at all. Period.

Just because you only know about Arabs hijacking planes doesn't make it true.

Educate yourself if you're going to speak about topics.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...aft_hijackings

No, we shouldn't check everyone equally. You check the people that are most likely planning to do something. Right now it's Muslims. 9/11, the dumb fukk shoe bomber, the underwear bomber, the ink printer cartridges. All Muslims. Not white people etc.

[probettor1]

handicappers are a fraud, is this profiling? No that is stats.

[MonkeyF0cker]

No, we shouldn't check everyone equally. You check the people that are most likely planning to do something. Right now it's Muslims. 9/11, the dumb fukk shoe bomber, the underwear bomber, the ink printer cartridges. All Muslims. Not white people etc.

Yep. And tomorrow if a group of Buddhists, Christians, or chimpanzes got through your security and blew up a plane because all of your efforts were made to concentrate on Muslims, it'd be them.

I'm just glad you're not in charge of (after it already happened) security.