To all liberals,would you bet at a sportsbook Obama owned like he runs the country?

[BrentCrude]

If you were a successful bettor he would force you to by some form of gambling insurance while for the unsuccessful bettors he would let you opt out of buying it.And if you were a broke unsuccessful bettor that wanted bettors insurance,he would give it to you for free on the backs of successful bettors.It would be called Obama betting care.

Then if you were in a special interest group he liked, he would give you back money on losing bets you placed getting that bailout money from people who won on that same game.

Then if you were really a sharp where you were winning all the time,he would insult you all the time saying you were a no good cheat that must have got privileged information on games all your life.He would call you selfish if you didn't give a portion of your winnings to bettors on long losing streaks who made awful bets.


So if you liberals would avoid a sportsbook like that at all cost,why do you think someone like that should run the country?

Then for promotions he would make people in his teachers pets special interest groups only have a playthrough of 4x while for others he didn't like it would be a12x playthrough on 100% free play.

[BrentCrude]

There would be bet abortions where successful bettors would pay a winning bet fee that allowed unsuccessful bettors in special interest groups Obama liked to abort their bets right up till 2 minutes before the game ended.

If you didn't abort the bet by the time the game ended where you lost and it was stll a live bet ,the grading doctor would let that botched losing bet die on the bet aborting table

[Shaudius]

Do you even listen to yourself? But lets spin in around on you. If a Social Conservative ran a sports book.

He wouldn't let you bet on Sundays because that's God's day and therefore you shouldn't be engaging in certain activities (why do you think you can't buy alcohol on Sundays).

He wouldn't let you bet on hockey or football even though you want to bet on hockey or football and you betting on hockey or basketball doesn't prevent anyone else from betting on baseball or basketball, which they want to bet on, because in God's eyes the only sports that are acceptable are those played in warm weather or indoors in warm climates, so I guess you should just learn to love baseball or basketball if you want to bet. (gay marriage).

If you took out a marker with interest and wanted to pay it back after 3 months or less, he wouldn't let you pay it back, even though you wanted to to avoid the interest, then after you paid back the loan after 9 months, which is when he wanted you to pay it back, he would continue to charge you interest for 18 years and tell you that if you didn't want to pay interest for 18 years you never should have taken out the loan in the first place, even if someone forced you to take out the loan on their behalf with a gun to your head. (An equally valid abortion analogy to your crazy abortion analogy).

Beyond that, you wouldn't be able to gamble because gambling is morally wrong and since only his morals matter he wouldn't let you gamble or run the book in the first place.

If instead the bookmaker was a "fiscal conservative" he wouldn't charge any vig, because vig is a form of taxation on your betting in order to ensure that the book makes money, but making money is bad and we shouldn't charge vig, so I guess we won't have any bookmaking businesses because they can't afford to operate without vig.

We can all make ridiculous analogies, but at the end of the day, they're still just ridiculous analogies.

[JohnGalt2341]

If a Libertarian that believed in the Free Market ran a Sportsbook it would probably be pretty similar to Pinnacle.