Your name is Barack. You’re rattled. And it shows.

[MonkeyF0cker]

Nervous? How so? This woman has no experience and no credibility. It will be pretty easy to discredit her.

[JRS21386]

Then why are they focusing so much on her? She is (as we speak) pulling once potential Obama supporters away simply because she is a woman. Women whom supported Hillary did so because they were advocates for better wages and rights for women... This is what those women think Palin will do now..

[ryanXL977]

nobody who supports hillary will support her
wait about 10 days till everyone finds out what this woman thinks, rest assured she is 180 degrees from everything hillary stands for

once she tells everyone that abortion should be illegal even in the case of rape and incest, and that the end of the world will come when all the jews are united in israel, that global warming is made up, etc

she wont have too many hilalry supporters, thats pretty much for sure

[JRS21386]

nobody who supports hillary will support her
wait about 10 days till everyone finds out what this woman thinks, rest assured she is 180 degrees from everything hillary stands for

once she tells everyone that abortion should be illegal even in the case of rape and incest, and that the end of the world will come when all the jews are united in israel, that global warming is made up, etc

she wont have too many hilalry supporters, thats pretty much for sure

I think you're right.. But what about all the White women obama supporters? While me and you arent religious nuts, the majority of society is in some sense

[ryanXL977]

well then we are ****ed if these religious nuts determine our domestic and foreign policy

and, i might add, GO UNC

[JRS21386]

well then we are ****ed if these religious nuts determine our domestic and foreign policy

and, i might add, GO UNC

Ha, Im on em tonight too! When is game time? I've been at work all day out of touch with the rest of the world, except for ofcourse, SBR...

[ryanXL977]

2.5 hrs baby

kansas tmrw too

[MonkeyF0cker]

And they'll find out quickly, if they aren't intelligent enough to have figured it out already, that the Republican platform is not going to be their savior in that regard. Anyone who was voting for Hillary for those reasons should know that the Democratic Party has the platform that supports those policies. In fact, it is more white males who are contributing to the recent bounce in the polls. Her policies do not deviate from the Republican platform with regard to women. She is staunchly religious and an avid pro-lifer. Palin is not their answer.

[JRS21386]

You may be right... I guess we will see come November..

[JRS21386]

Ill just be happy to get ANY new administration in there...

[durito]

I love how they've modeled Obama who grew up poor into someone that lived some sort of life of privilege . It's typical republican nonsense.

Up until 5 years ago he had no money. Contrast to Mr. McCain who can't remember how many houses he owns.

[SBR Lou]

and, i might add, GO UNC

Brilliant!

[SBR Lou]

Up until 5 years ago he had no money. Contrast to Mr. McCain who can't remember how many houses he owns.

Do you really want someone who was broke 5 years ago to be the next President of the United States?

[JRS21386]

I love how they've modeled Obama who grew up poor into someone that lived some sort of life of privilege . It's typical republican nonsense.

Up until 5 years ago he had no money. Contrast to Mr. McCain who can't remember how many houses he owns.

Which would be mostly in thanks to his Wife, Cindy...

[durito]

Do you really want someone who was broke 5 years ago to be the next President of the United States?

Wtf does money have to do with anything?

Obama was President of Harvard Law Review, he had his choice of top highly paid legal positions anywhere in the world. Instead he went to Chicago to do poorly paid work helping poor people.

I like that 100x more than GWB who lived his whole life off family money.

The Clintons didn't have much money until after Bill's presidency.

[JRS21386]

Wtf does money have to do with anything?

Obama was President of Harvard Law Review, he had his choice of top highly paid legal positions anywhere in the world. Instead he went to Chicago to do poorly paid work helping poor people.

I like that 100x more than GWB who lived his whole life off family money.

The Clintons didn't have much money until after Bill's presidency.

Hell id take the money and run!

[MonkeyF0cker]

Do you really want someone who was broke 5 years ago to be the next President of the United States?

Are you insinuating that being able to relate on a first hand basis to the daily grind of the vast majority of the American public and their struggles just to make ends meet is somehow a liability for a Presidential candidate?

[SBR Lou]

Are you insinuating that being able to relate on a first hand basis to the daily grind of the vast majority of the American public and their struggles just to make ends meet is somehow a liability for a Presidential candidate?

I'm just saying that being President of the United States is more than a huge responsibility is all, and you'd prefer someone with a little more experience and time under his belt in politics. Not some guy that was barely recognized by his own party a few years back.

[pavyracer]

I will not trust the nuclear suitcase to an old crunky high tempered man. This is what Putin wants.

[frostno98]

The GOP base will not be fired up for this election and it will reflect at the polls come November, that's why the Palin/McCain ticket going down in flames.

[MonkeyF0cker]

So if we want change, we should make sure that our Presidential candidates have had as many years as possible in the political machine to corrupt and distort any fresh visions they may have had for this country before being elected President? Sounds fairly self defeating to me...

[SBR Lou]

So if we want change, we should make sure that our Presidential candidates have had as many years as possible in the political machine to corrupt and distort any fresh visions they may have had for this country before being elected President? Sounds fairly self defeating to me...

It's politics, it's just a matter of who you're worse off with. That fresh vision stuff and change BS is just political jargon, don't buy in. It's about saying what people want to hear like anything else, Obama is just a little more wet behind the ears and that's not a quality one really wants in their leader.

[topgame85]

Write in Ron Paul so you can sleep at night

[JRS21386]

It's politics, it's just a matter of who you're worse off with. That fresh vision stuff and change BS is just political jargon, don't buy in. It's about saying what people want to hear like anything else, Obama is just a little more wet behind the ears and that's not a quality one really wants in their leader.

I agree... Im the same way i don't favor one candidate or the other.. Nobody has "blown me away" per se.. I just want someone that i believe will be more experienced.. That doesnt make me wrong, or you right...

[MonkeyF0cker]

It's politics, it's just a matter of who you're worse off with. That fresh vision stuff and change BS is just political jargon, don't buy in. It's about saying what people want to hear like anything else, Obama is just a little more wet behind the ears and that's not a quality one really wants in their leader.

So you really don't think that a fresh face has a greater chance of mending fences and getting things accomplished in Washington? That someone can actually bring something of their own to the table by coordinating compromises between the two parties? Do you think an old stodgy Senator who has been engrained in his ways for years has a better chance of accomplishing this? Since experience forgoes all other aspects in your mind, what in the Senate is learned in the 5th through the 25th year of service that provides so much more ample executive decision making experience? And what happens if that candidate does indeed pass away during his term and we are left with the most inexperienced candidate of all, one who two years ago was the mayor of a town of 9000 people, making such important decisions as which day garbage collection should fall on? And if that candidate which has such great experience does indeed maintain the status quo as his campaign seems to be exuding, even though the status quo seems to be a path toward self destruction, is experience still the number one deciding factor? How much worse could things get by bringing in a new face? I honestly don't understand that rationale...

[daggerkobe]

Can't wait for the debates......

Obama will massacre the old coot....

Palin will look like Miss South Carolina trying to answer questions about Troopergate and Pregnantat17gate.

[ryanXL977]

i am most curious because i have a theory

that theory is: when bush ran vs kerry or bush vs gore, the same people now who take issue with baracks lack of experience never brought up bush's lack of experience

and the texas governor has , possibly, less control over the state than any of state gov

[ms61853]

The GOP base will not be fired up for this election and it will reflect at the polls come November, that's why the Palin/McCain ticket going down in flames.

That's where you are now wrong. I post on a lot of political forums and blogs and the Palin choice has absolutely galvanized the base behind McCain/Palin. The constant petty attacks on Palin have furthered galvanized the base. Even many former Paultards who despised Mccain have come on board.

If Mccain had chosen Romney or Ridge etc, your analysis may have been correct.

5 days ago, Intrade had Obama as a 60-40 favorite to become President. McCain now leads. these are people who have to put their money where their mouth is.

[ryanXL977]

people will learn about this woman and they will be toast
nobody knows anything about her.

[ryanXL977]

That's where you are now wrong. I post on a lot of political forums and blogs and the Palin choice has absolutely galvanized the base behind McCain/Palin. The constant petty attacks on Palin have furthered galvanized the base. Even many former Paultards who despised Mccain have come on board.

If Mccain had chosen Romney or Ridge etc, your analysis may have been correct.

5 days ago, Intrade had Obama as a 60-40 favorite to become President. McCain now leads. these are people who have to put their money where their mouth is.

so you would prefer a 1.5 year governor of the smallest state in the country over two governors of fairly decent sized states, because she is anti choice? is there any actual qualification she has? besides going to the university of idaho and having a 17 year old who is pregnant and about to have a shotgun marriage. some family values. 2% of all teens with kids graduate college and somehting like 75% of all marriages started before 23, end in divorce

thats wonderful parenting

[durito]

That's where you are now wrong. I post on a lot of political forums and blogs and the Palin choice has absolutely galvanized the base behind McCain/Palin. The constant petty attacks on Palin have furthered galvanized the base. Even many former Paultards who despised Mccain have come on board.

If Mccain had chosen Romney or Ridge etc, your analysis may have been correct.

5 days ago, Intrade had Obama as a 60-40 favorite to become President. McCain now leads. these are people who have to put their money where their mouth is.

Want to bet $5,000 straight up?

[smitch124]

Sometimes I wonder how much "experience" just means well immersed in business-as-usual politics, to me experience is overrated.

[ryanXL977]

i just want to know why these peoplw ill use any excuse not to vote for a black man or a democrat

as if a democrat will somehow be worse than the last decade

was clinton bad? was the usa really bad off during the 1990s? compared to now, which decade is better? these people will use any excuse for their reasons, its just insane

[JRS21386]

I think we'll be surprised in the debates

[JRS21386]

i just want to know why these peoplw ill use any excuse not to vote for a black man or a democrat

as if a democrat will somehow be worse than the last decade

was clinton bad? was the usa really bad off during the 1990s? compared to now, which decade is better? these people will use any excuse for their reasons, its just insane

I think dem or rep would do better than last decade... wouldnt be hard..