Wasnt that easy,this guy still lost money....
LB 15 min of forum fame was up along time ago...
LB 15 min of forum fame was up along time ago...
-
Comment -
yes sir that was so easy...
Comment -
Originally posted by dontbuythehookDon't agree with the Bears wager here at all. This isn't a similar circumstance to NBA or a different NFL replacement aside from the QB where someone like Bush on Oakland or the backup for TB when they played Saints @ home weeks ago and end up doing well without the starting players, or in the NBA where you can replace someone like tyreke evans on the Sacramento Kings and still cover ATS on the road vs various good teams (you said it yourself, everyone in the NBA is a pre-madonna one player doesn't matter if they're out). I think Cutler being out will make this have a reverse effect on Chicago's performance. Someone on this board mentioned (forgot who) that a lot of forte's running is because of cutler setting it up, and if it isn't very clean then I can see OAK stopping the run in this game. OAK secondary will without a doubt have two or more picks this game. This is probably going to be the easiest game Palmer has played out of his first 4 and carrying that momentum and in front of his home crowd makes this is a really bad spot for the Bears. In my opinion, I don't think that teams necessarily come out firing after losing their main QB, because I think it tends to take a bit longer for that once they realize the season is literally in jeopardy after two or more losses. The Bears are excellent at stopping the run, so that's +1 for them in that department but if and when OAK comes up with the first touchdown, or defensive turnover leading into a quick TD, then I find it extremely hard for the Bears to pull out a comeback given the injury circumstance. Give me OAK -5.5 right now for 1-2 units.
GTFO you fukkin mush.
Have fun reloading your account. You haven't won a fukkin play this month.
Comment -
I can't for the explanation for this guy. He will say he was really on the other side or it was a typo.
Better yet he bought out of it, or played the middle. Of course none of that will be documented will.
Can'taffordthehook.
Barreled in fuk.
Comment -
I was wrong, however I didn't have OAK -5.5 for the game, this is what I had:Originally posted by billysinkI can't for the explanation for this guy. He will say he was really on the other side or it was a typo.
Better yet he bought out of it, or played the middle. Of course none of that will be documented will.
Can'taffordthehook.
Barreled in fuk.
<table class="title" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td class="headertxtCell">[#xxxxxxxxx] STRAIGHT BET (Risking: 1,000.00 - To Win: 1,100.00) </td><td class="statusimgCell">
</td></tr></tbody></table><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr class="oddRow"><td class="dateCell">11/27/2011 - xx:xx PM</td><td class="idCell">NFL </td><td class="pickCell">[2230] 2H OAKLAND PK+110
Score: 2H CHICAGO(13) - 2H OAKLAND(13)</td><td class="statusimgCell">PUSH</td></tr></tbody></table>Comment -
Rrrrrraaaaaaaiddddderrrrrsssss!!!!Comment -
Only joke I see is the OPComment -
so easy he needed an 81 yd play to get a push for a line he got from a local (made up).
Comment -
Good lord. Why would you say HOU was a pointless game for a wager LB in favor of CHI. Unfathomable...Comment -
SURE YA DID KIDOriginally posted by dontbuythehookI was wrong, however I didn't have OAK -5.5 for the game, this is what I had:
<table class="title" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td class="headertxtCell">[#xxxxxxxxx] STRAIGHT BET (Risking: 1,000.00 - To Win: 1,100.00) </td><td class="statusimgCell"></td></tr></tbody></table><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr class="oddRow"><td class="dateCell">11/27/2011 - xx:xx PM</td><td class="idCell">NFL </td><td class="pickCell">[2230] 2H OAKLAND PK+110
Score: 2H CHICAGO(13) - 2H OAKLAND(13)</td><td class="statusimgCell">PUSH</td></tr></tbody></table>
you had Oakland -5.5 says so right in this thread. Too fukkin stupid to wait for a better line.
Of course you ain't gonna post that ticket are you. All you have to show for recouping your losses is a fukkin push.
With your long winded rant about Tyreke Evans.
He had a lot to do with this one.
Fukkin mush.
**** I forgot my smileys
Comment -
Tyreke Evans? When have I ever posted about Tyreke Evans? You do realize if I was on the computer today I would have taken OAK @ -3 and won, but i had to take 2h cuz I was out watching the games. not covering 2h was complete bullshit tbhOriginally posted by billysink
Comment -
CANTAFFORDTHRHOOK
I gave you Arizona last night I am sure you made that play. It is not often someone who is 8-3-1 on his posted SBR plays tries to help out and azzhole like you is it.
Watch and learn barrel boy. Watch and learnComment -
billysink I would be hardpressed to find anyone on here that gives a shit about what you post or your high school level analysis on games. Why don't you show us some tickets mr. 'couple hundred k'Comment -
A very compelling arguement there Opie. Wrong sport but whatever works for you.Originally posted by dontbuythehookDon't agree with the Bears wager here at all. This isn't a similar circumstance to NBA or a different NFL replacement aside from the QB where someone like Bush on Oakland or the backup for TB when they played Saints @ home weeks ago and end up doing well without the starting players, or in the NBA where you can replace someone like tyreke evans on the Sacramento Kings and still cover ATS on the road vs various good teams (you said it yourself, everyone in the NBA is a pre-madonna one player doesn't matter if they're out). I think Cutler being out will make this have a reverse effect on Chicago's performance. Someone on this board mentioned (forgot who) that a lot of forte's running is because of cutler setting it up, and if it isn't very clean then I can see OAK stopping the run in this game. OAK secondary will without a doubt have two or more picks this game. This is probably going to be the easiest game Palmer has played out of his first 4 and carrying that momentum and in front of his home crowd makes this is a really bad spot for the Bears. In my opinion, I don't think that teams necessarily come out firing after losing their main QB, because I think it tends to take a bit longer for that once they realize the season is literally in jeopardy after two or more losses. The Bears are excellent at stopping the run, so that's +1 for them in that department but if and when OAK comes up with the first touchdown, or defensive turnover leading into a quick TD, then I find it extremely hard for the Bears to pull out a comeback given the injury circumstance. Give me OAK -5.5 right now for 1-2 units.
Actually nothing works for you but what the fuk.
Comment -
Ah, that's right. Yes that is completely true and if you're in this thread to praise CHI backers then rest assured you are confirmed mush. Everyone here who tailed LB lost b/c they got +4.5 or worse for the most part. He buried the thread. Are you willing to show us your CHI ticket, mush? Thought so!
Comment -
For the seeing impaired, added a little Sacramento purple.Originally posted by dontbuythehookDon't agree with the Bears wager here at all. This isn't a similar circumstance to NBA or a different NFL replacement aside from the QB where someone like Bush on Oakland or the backup for TB when they played Saints @ home weeks ago and end up doing well without the starting players, or in the NBA where you can replace someone like tyreke evans on the Sacramento Kings and still cover ATS on the road vs various good teams (you said it yourself, everyone in the NBA is a pre-madonna one player doesn't matter if they're out). I think Cutler being out will make this have a reverse effect on Chicago's performance. Someone on this board mentioned (forgot who) that a lot of forte's running is because of cutler setting it up, and if it isn't very clean then I can see OAK stopping the run in this game. OAK secondary will without a doubt have two or more picks this game. This is probably going to be the easiest game Palmer has played out of his first 4 and carrying that momentum and in front of his home crowd makes this is a really bad spot for the Bears. In my opinion, I don't think that teams necessarily come out firing after losing their main QB, because I think it tends to take a bit longer for that once they realize the season is literally in jeopardy after two or more losses. The Bears are excellent at stopping the run, so that's +1 for them in that department but if and when OAK comes up with the first touchdown, or defensive turnover leading into a quick TD, then I find it extremely hard for the Bears to pull out a comeback given the injury circumstance. Give me OAK -5.5 right now for 1-2 units.Comment -
Actually I have had some great feedback on my posts kid.Originally posted by dontbuythehook
They love em. Shit they are even giving points for them. Which is kinda cool. My kid makes wagers with them.
Maybe you don't like em there Opie. 8-3-1. Maybe you should. I can't find your last winner.
But I am looking around and don't see one ******* person even interacting with you other than me shoving your head in your ass. So don't tell me what folks think about my info. You don't post any.
I am getting pretty good with the smileys eh kid. The really make me feel like I have proven my point.
Just like you Mushman!!!!Comment -
Sorry nice try.Originally posted by dontbuythehookAh, that's right. Yes that is completely true and if you're in this thread to praise CHI backers then rest assured you are confirmed mush. Everyone here who tailed LB lost b/c they got +4.5 or worse for the most part. He buried the thread. Are you willing to show us your CHI ticket, mush? Thought so!
Only one posted play.
Arizona plus 3
Told everyone in this thread I didn't know Caleb Hanie from a rat's ass so I was out.
That guy is a worse QB than you are a gambler.
And that is very, very, very hard to do.Comment -
NiceOriginally posted by BernardMadoff
Comment -
billydink has a child and is on in this thread craving attention Yeah nice play on AZ+3, i'm sure that's what you spent the entire day on sbr and why you are taking your rage out on me 
umadcuzuburiedtoday?
Comment -
First time in my life I ever gave anyone a kick in the face after they lost. This ain't me SBR. Just trying to teach this fukkin idiot a lesson.
He makes a habit out of it.
I will beat him like a rented mule until he quits.Comment -
look how many people are actually taking the time to support your argument: 0
look how many people are pissed off b/c they listened to lakerboy: majority of thread
look at what your life has amounted to: has a child and no friends so he is on SBR raging b/c he's broke. You haven't posted a single ticket once on this forum and I would be shocked if you bet over $100 a game. Brokeboy trying to make mortgage, eh?
Comment -
Originally posted by dontbuythehookbillydink has a child and is on in this thread craving attention Yeah nice play on AZ+3, i'm sure that's what you spent the entire day on sbr and why you are taking your rage out on me
umadcuzuburiedtoday?
Post my losing plays Earl.
You gotta make them up but fuk go ahead.
That is par for your lame ass course.
8-3-1 all documented right here. With tons of information.
And none of it about Tyreke Evans.Comment -
Wait, so you don't even bet $100 a game and you are bragging about being 8-3-1?
Comment -
If that fantasy suits you kid fire away.Originally posted by dontbuythehooklook how many people are actually taking the time to support your argument: 0
look how many people are pissed off b/c they listened to lakerboy: majority of thread
look at what your life has amounted to: has a child and no friends so he is on SBR raging b/c he's broke. You haven't posted a single ticket once on this forum and I would be shocked if you bet over $100 a game. Brokeboy trying to make mortgage, eh?
Argument. I don't see any argument here. Just me handing you your ass.
Anyway I gotta go play hockey so enjoy your evening Musher.
Can you post a link to your last winning play? I can't find one....Comment -
I think we have ourselves another faker guys. Who's ghost are you? Posted record of 8-3-1, yet he doesn't post any tickets. You have a child, but you have made 'probably couple hundred k' off sports? I call bullshit. you're a broke piece of shit, even goat milk claims he has big bets for $200, yet you never post shit b/c I know you would post a ticket if it exceeded those bet sizes. Yup complete bullshit.Comment -
Fakerboy at it again.
Comment -
<table class="title" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td class="headertxtCell">[#xxxxxxxxx] STRAIGHT BET (Risking: 825.00 - To Win: 750.00) </td><td class="statusimgCell">Originally posted by billysink
</td></tr></tbody></table><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr class="oddRow"><td class="dateCell">11/27/2011 - xx:xx AM</td><td class="idCell">NFL </td><td class="pickCell">[223] CAROLINA -4-110
Score: CAROLINA(27) - INDIANAPOLIS(19)</td><td class="statusimgCell">WIN</td></tr></tbody></table>750.00Comment -
Originally posted by dontbuythehookWait, so you don't even bet $100 a game and you are bragging about being 8-3-1?
Oh really. I bet 77,768 a game.
Have some fun with that kid.
Truth is I bet what I bet. You can make up any fukking number you want.
Because at 8-3-1 if I bet 5 fukkin dollars that would still be more than you make.
See you gotta win to get paid there Earl.
And that counts you out.Comment -
So you are admitting that you are broke and just airbetting? guy is a shame artist everyone now let's expose his ass! broke piece of shit and has a child but spent the last two days trying to hold a case against me when he doesn't even wager $100 a game loooooooooool biggest mush ever LOOOOOOOOOOL scrub
Comment -
Here's Mine. Shit we use the same book Mushyboy. I probably bought my new Caddy with your money.. Thanks!!!!
<table class="title" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td class="headertxtCell">[#xxxxxxxxx] STRAIGHT BET (Risking: 82500.00 - To Win: 75000.00) </td><td class="statusimgCell"></td></tr></tbody></table><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr class="oddRow"><td class="dateCell">11/27/2011 - xx:xx AM</td><td class="idCell">NFL </td><td class="pickCell">[223] ARIZONA +3-110
Score: ARIZONA(23) - ST. LOUIS (20)</td><td class="statusimgCell">WIN</td></tr></tbody></table>75000.00
Comment -
Shit my fake ticket looks better than yours.
Comment -
Ya. won't post a ticket because you know the truth. Case is closed, gg mush brokeboy
Comment -
8-3-1
Gotta go!!!!!Comment -
Yup, when you return from the salvation army with food for the week make sure to update your record from 8-3-1 to 9-3-1Comment
