Seeing Rod lose probably made VI's week
loser is a points bettor and wishes he got attention like Rod
loser is a points bettor and wishes he got attention like Rod
-
Comment -
You know, the ones that consists of air bets and no screen shots.
Originally posted by GreeksterComment -
lol alert im picking winners in hockey at a 50% clip, the same as a blind monkey, and i will keep posting like i know what the **** im talking about.Originally posted by GreeksterComment -
"must bet game" gimme a freakin breakComment -
I know only reason he was pulling for stars... now he's opie's bffOriginally posted by Sunde91Comment -
why not just keep it real and say hey it looks like it has a decent shot, play figures...must bet game..gtfoComment -
Rod is on a cold spell. Lay off and wait til he starts winning again.
Comment -
Yep...massive points bettor, that's all. Never wager cash. Ever. I'm a loser.
Why would I care if Rod loses? It doesn't effect my life.
It's bad karma to root for others to fail.Comment -
I think we were definitely on the ride side here, just didn't get the breaks...Originally posted by mh217Comment -
Fukk me. Im buriedComment -
What's up with all the hate tonight? I've never even heard of you two guys hating on me.Originally posted by Louisvillekid1
a) I'm a huge hockey fan and enjoyed that game...one of the best I've seen all year.
b) I didn't agree that Phx was worth of a 3 unit play...not that it wasn't the right side.
So much hate, you guys have issues.Comment -
Lock of the century tomorrow. Philly ML -138 over Montreal. Trust me, I am Canadian lolComment -
i guess...im just mad at myself..i looked at the hockey card for 2 mins before i blindly bet this shit and the game that stood out as a lock to me was the penguins over the islanders..and i won a 100 on that but i lost 600 on this...im the freakin idiot of the year.Comment -
Exactly.Originally posted by Greekster
This season iv been taking a bunch of games ranging from +110 to as high as +170 that i think are pretty much coin flips. Been hitting 50% and making a really nice profit.
Ofcourse, you have to look for value and take favorites too. I try not to go above -130 or -140 for ML, otherwise maybe a regulation bet. But yeah, def. look into underdogs, thats the way to go.
And dont bet against goalies that are 6-0 lol.Comment -
oh well now its gonna be freakin hours of tennis betting coming up..shit never endsComment -
You did 6 units on a play just because Rod liked it? Well, you know it was dumb. I don't need to say anything. I'd rather make my own huge wagers because at least then I can be mad at myself.Originally posted by mh217Comment -
It probably was the right side, mh217Originally posted by mh217
Phx held the lead until one minute left....I bet with 90 seconds left you thought it was a good play.
It's all relative. Rod is going to get hot, multiple times this year, so you gotta stick with him.Comment -
no hate at all, it just seems like you have something against rod... your all good in my book bro, i always check your threads out....Originally posted by VegasInsiderComment -
don't start chasing, you'll get 'em back... we got the series tomorrow....Originally posted by mh217Comment -
canadian with a penn st logo, touting philly as a lock... lol, can't follow this one...Originally posted by GreeksterComment -
It happens. Lesson learned, right?Originally posted by mh217
Losing a pick that you blindly follow is a much worse feeling then the good that comes from winning a pick you blindly follow IMO.
Atleast you hit the Pens game, which was def. an easy/smart play. Was on that too...
Rod is usually sharp with hockey, still really curious why he liked this game. When i looked at it, first thing i thought was that it was the most 50/50 game out there. Two overachieving teams, you gotta favor the home team, but Stars had a huge goalie advantage. Just sucks that you guys were that close to cashing big.Comment -
i never tail anyone..i always pick my own stuff..but i seen this freakin confidence the kid had in the game and i had a good amount of cash in the acct so i just said **** it hope he's right...i mean its a bitter loss but trust me if you see me post something like that its gonna win by so much its not even funny..win or lose this was no lock.Originally posted by priskilla22Comment -
I have nothing against Rod, he's a good hockey handicapper and knows his stuff. We actually chat quite a bit in the chat room about different hockey stuff (locker room talk, interviews, injuries, etc)
My biggest problem is with guys that blindly follow, have no idea about hockey and then get upset if the play loses. If the play wins, Rod is a genius. If it loses, Rod is on a cold streak. It's why I don't post my plays very often, anymore.Comment -
I'll admit i blindly follow spot hockey plays, but never blame the person im following... I don't follow hockey that much, but it was an entertaining last few hours watching the game... just got some bad luck... Turn the page, my friend...Originally posted by VegasInsiderComment -
-140 is way too much juice to lay for a game in Montreal. Yea, the Canadiens are struggling this year, but they are still a decent team and more importantly at home. Its tough to play there, they wont keep losing there. PHI is going to be a huge public play tomorrow, though i think its another one of these 50/50 games. Not worth the -140.Originally posted by Greekster
Avs might be decent value if you can get them around +110. They have been lights out on the road.Comment -
people just seem to throw the words lock and must bet around too easily..but in the end its no ones fault but my own im a big boy..but guys i can tell you this if you see me post something and im screaming lock..its a 95% winner..and 95% of the time its a blowoutComment -
this game was winnable of course and prob should have won..but it was never a must bet or a lock..it was just a gameComment -
Price should be back in net tomorrow night after he rested in the loss to Florida. Philly is playing real fukking good right now and scoring goals in bunches. I'm not sure Montreal's offense can score enough. Should be a battle.Originally posted by Cicima6709Comment -
well neways its been fun, goodnight fellas... gl on your plays tom, all im on is texas +108 and u7.5 both for 4 units...
if you guys got anything solid for pucks tom let me know....Comment -
Aboslutely agreed. IMO it was the toughest game on the board today, along with TB/BUF.Originally posted by mh217
Yeah, but a team is usually never as bad as they appear during a losing streak, nor as good as they appear during a winning streak.Originally posted by VegasInsider
Canadiens are desperate, and their players/coaches are approaching as much of a must-win game as there can ever be in October. Im not saying the Flyers lose, but -140 is too much to lay on a game like this.Comment -
Originally posted by VegasInsiderPhx 1-8 in the shootout
Made Lehtonen look like Patrick Ray
Roy pronounced Wahhh
Any hockey sharp should know this...Comment -
Rod buries the forum...AGAIN and in the process temporarily takes top spot of biggest clown at SBR from daimosausage...UnrealComment -
Okay, so you state Philly is a huge public play and -140 is too much, then you turn around and take a dog b/c you assume getting + points = sharp, yet avs are obviously going to be a bigger public play here:Originally posted by Cicima6709
Percentages broken down of current bets on both games:
Game 1:
Flyers: 70%
Montreal: 30%
Game 2:
Avalanche: 84%
Calgary: 16%
So, it is more square to take Philly @ 70% on the ML, but it's totally sharp to take Avs +110 @ 84%
******* mush just refuses to lay juice but tries to make agreeable 'sharp' picks yet he's completely in denial about where the money is obviously going to go.
Comment -
What happened, Rod?Comment -
Rod bets too many DOGS..that does not workComment
