Tar Heels and Bruins to advance with ease

[mofome]

He's a good guy. You just have to understand his style. But all in all you have to give him credit for posting his picks, keeping an honest record, and sharing his insights on games. Most guys don't do that.... I am slightly surprised you and him don't get along. I would have thought for sure you two would get along easy.




Well, a guy says that UCLA and UNC are going to win with ease and then says Xavier +6.5 and UL +6 are real good bets too. You tell me if there is a problem?

ive known him for many years, through his stiffing and so on. he is, simply put, the most insecure guy on the boards. 1 day he says im one of the best couple handicappers on here, the next im not good. one day he asks me to defend him on the rx because he's being ripped, and today im no good. he used to post under my name and use my picture as his avatar before i had ever heard of this forum. he talks trash, but cant take it if you reply. lets make this clear, there are zero things that he can do better than i; i just hope i dont receive any more of his emails asking me to defend him from carolina kid and i hope he doesn't sign up as 'mofome' on any other forums. i dont ask for much.

[Red_Sux]

good call. i was thinking baout doing the same thing too. didn't have the guts to pull the trigger

[mofome]

He's a good guy. You just have to understand his style. But all in all you have to give him credit for posting his picks, keeping an honest record, and sharing his insights on games. Most guys don't do that.... I am slightly surprised you and him don't get along. I would have thought for sure you two would get along easy.




Well, a guy says that UCLA and UNC are going to win with ease and then says Xavier +6.5 and UL +6 are real good bets too. You tell me if there is a problem?

you referenced my name, that is what i was asking. im not exactly sure what you were talking about. so, you tell me.

[BuddyBear]

you referenced my name, that is what i was asking. im not exactly sure what you were talking about. so, you tell me.

I am talking about how Pavy said UCLA would win with ease and that your Xavier +6.5 was a good bet. I was just questionning how he could offer to opinions that were clearly mutually exclusive. There was nothing more to it than that.....you just happened to bet Xavier....

[pavyracer]

Dude, the title of the thread referred to my confidence in both games being won with ease for ML's since they were my best Final Four choices.

Watching how the NC game went the +6 wasn't a bad choice by mofome. That doesn't mean he capped the game wrong.

I got beat up badly last week by San Diego +6.5 and Georgetown -4 where San Diego was up by a point and lost by nine with 4 min left and Georgetown was up by 19 points early 2nd half. Does this mean I was a bad capper and I didn't know what I was doing?

Quit being mister know everything and quit criticizing everyone's plays. If you want to play it mucho post your picks before the games start, don't come after the fact and say you are on the other side and we don't know what we are doing.