Originally posted by durito
-
Total landed on 204 (115-89).Comment -
I don't think it was stipulated that he had to actually enter the wagers in at a book for them to be counted. Just that, he must pick x% winners working within the parameters you've outlined.Comment -
ur right 21-16-1Originally posted by duritoComment -
Originally posted by rjt721
I see the same thing. I guess it will be ok , though, next week when he makes it up and picks his 6 overs, 0 unders, 5 favorites and 1 dog
Comment -
I think I am going to set something up next year with Durito or Raiders like this and see if I can hit 60%.....seems like it could be fun if done for a small amountComment -
Must have had a wrong score -- final was 115-89 (204) you had over 206Originally posted by robzilla
20-17-1Comment -
Originally posted by BuddyBear
You'll have to see if Raiders will do it. Your smart enough to beat me.Comment -
Originally posted by crazyl
Right. I don't care if bets games or not. He's allowed to use any line from sbrlines. As Ganchrow pointed out that could give him some great value opportunities, but he chose not to pursue that strategy. What I find funny, is that he used a worse line than was available on several of his picks yesterday. Any serious handicapper understands the value of a 1/2 pt (and in this case, that is a free 1/2pr or even 1pt in some cases) and one would think he would take the few seconds required to find that best line.
13 picks left, only have to go 10-3 (76.9%) Thats about his claimed long term win rate, so it shouldn't be an issue.Comment -
pats vs. Balt. under 46.5 -113 matchbookComment -
dallas vs. Columbus over 5.0 +105Comment -
i think i lost those last 2 games...that would put me at 20-19-1 i think.
Washington -3 -107Comment -
lol.....i don't know about that. I'd like to think i've gained a lot of experience over the years but 60% is near impossible.Originally posted by durito
Just to show you how smart I am, i've picked more winners than losers this year and when I log into my accounts my balances don't seem to reflect that
Comment -
Any picks today?
Need to go 9-1 to win. One of those 16-0 days you have so often should do the trick.Comment -
I think the pro gambler wishes you would just go away duritoOriginally posted by durito
Comment -
Miami Buffalo over 34.5
St. Louis +10Comment -
20 out of 22 books at SBRLINES have the MIA/BUF total at 34, yet you chose over 34.5
If that's not a demonstration that you are as far from a professional player as possible, I don't know what is.Comment -
How about having chosen the over 35? Or the over 48? Or the over 116?Originally posted by durito
Comment -
Originally posted by GanchrowHow about having chosen the over 35? Or the over 48? Or the over 116?
At this rate, over 116 has a shot in this game.
Hey Ganchrow, if you don't mind me asking: Why don't you bet football?Comment -
23-19-1 (54.76%)
Pretty good record actually.
I don't mean to keep bumping this, but it's been a week since you've made a pick Rob. I know it was a slow week, but even I had a few bets this week.Comment -
Baltimore -1.5 1H -105
New Orleans -2.5 1H -115
Pittsburgh -2.5 1H + 105
new orleans - arizona Under 24.0 1H +107
GB - STL Over 22.5 1H -115
Dallas -6.5 1H -115
Det. - Oak Under 23.0 1H -107
Phi Dallas - Under 24.5 1H -113Comment -
Detroit plays San Diego and Oakland plays IndianapolisComment -
that was supposed to be det - SDOriginally posted by duritoComment -
Baltimore -1.5 1H -105
New Orleans -2.5 1H -115
Pittsburgh -2.5 1H + 105
new orleans - arizona Under 24.0 1H +107
GB - STL Over 22.5 1H -115
Dallas -6.5 1H -115
Det. - Oak Under 23.0 1H -107
Phi Dallas - Under 24.5 1H -113
26-21-1Comment -
27-23-1 54%
Would you like to amend your statement that you win at 75% or would you like to do another bet (for real money this time)?Comment -
wheres the restComment
