THIS is why he was found NOT GUILTY
Watching ESPN June 17th special and I wonder...
Collapse
X
-
Brock LandersSBR Aristocracy
- 06-30-08
- 45359
#36Comment -
stealthyburritoSBR Posting Legend
- 05-12-09
- 21562
#37Originally posted by hoopster42deuce's original question: "Why didn't OJ get charged for alluding and evading officers?"
obamaismydaddy's response: "the answer is jonnie cochran".
obama misspells mr. cochran's first name, and gives the wrong answer!
there are some stupid, ignorant, uneducated people on this forum!!
ok, ok if you really want to get technical then fine.
man you really do need a break from here.Comment -
Brock LandersSBR Aristocracy
- 06-30-08
- 45359
#38American History X
"its opportunism at its worst"Comment -
Justin7SBR Hall of Famer
- 07-31-06
- 8577
#39I've seen the evidence. He was innocent.Comment -
Brock LandersSBR Aristocracy
- 06-30-08
- 45359
#40Originally posted by Justin7I've seen the evidence. He was innocent.Comment -
stealthyburritoSBR Posting Legend
- 05-12-09
- 21562
#41Originally posted by Justin7I've seen the evidence. He was innocent.Comment -
ronjon619SBR MVP
- 09-06-09
- 3675
#42"if the glove don't fit, you must acquit."Comment -
hoopster42Restricted User
- 02-12-08
- 6099
#43Originally posted by Justin7I've seen the evidence. He was innocent.Comment -
Grind HouseSBR MVP
- 01-01-10
- 1405
#44Don't know what the fuk ya'll talking about, the man is innocent of murder. The police should go look for the real killers.Comment -
Justin7SBR Hall of Famer
- 07-31-06
- 8577
#45Originally posted by hoopster42you are either the dumbest human on earth or you did not see all of the evidence. which is it?
Calling him innocent is a statement of fact and law, not an opinion. My opinion is he is a murderer, and got away with it.Comment -
hoopster42Restricted User
- 02-12-08
- 6099
#46Originally posted by Justin7Perhaps both?
Calling him innocent is a statement of fact and law, not an opinion. My opinion is he is a murderer, and got away with it.Comment -
Brock LandersSBR Aristocracy
- 06-30-08
- 45359
#47Originally posted by hoopster42the correct term is "not guilty". "innocent" means cleared of all charges through proof of evidence that does not implicate him. OJ was found "not guilty", not "innocent". And if you think the evidence proves him "innocent", then you need to get yourself an education, specifically in biology where you can learn how dna is a genetic fingerprintComment -
hoopster42Restricted User
- 02-12-08
- 6099
#48Originally posted by Brock Landerstoo bad double jeopardy excludes him from being tried properly..Comment -
brooks85SBR Aristocracy
- 01-05-09
- 44709
#49sublime album beginning to end, ****ing amazingComment -
brooks85SBR Aristocracy
- 01-05-09
- 44709
#50i would of love for those rats to try and jack my ride. They would be breakdancing under my car.Comment -
BadNinaSBR Posting Legend
- 11-27-07
- 10491
#51the way the evidence was presented in that case, I would have had to vote not guilty as well. The DA's office did a horrible job. They were outmanuevered by Cochran and Shapiro.Comment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code