Watching ESPN June 17th special and I wonder...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Brock Landers
    SBR Aristocracy
    • 06-30-08
    • 45359

    #36
    THIS is why he was found NOT GUILTY

    Comment
    • stealthyburrito
      SBR Posting Legend
      • 05-12-09
      • 21562

      #37
      Originally posted by hoopster42
      deuce's original question: "Why didn't OJ get charged for alluding and evading officers?"

      obamaismydaddy's response: "the answer is jonnie cochran".

      obama misspells mr. cochran's first name, and gives the wrong answer!

      there are some stupid, ignorant, uneducated people on this forum!!



      ok, ok if you really want to get technical then fine.

      man you really do need a break from here.
      Comment
      • Brock Landers
        SBR Aristocracy
        • 06-30-08
        • 45359

        #38
        American History X



        "its opportunism at its worst"
        Comment
        • Justin7
          SBR Hall of Famer
          • 07-31-06
          • 8577

          #39
          I've seen the evidence. He was innocent.
          Comment
          • Brock Landers
            SBR Aristocracy
            • 06-30-08
            • 45359

            #40
            Originally posted by Justin7
            I've seen the evidence. He was innocent.
            bloody gloves and socks on his property, pretty tough to beat that evidence.
            Comment
            • stealthyburrito
              SBR Posting Legend
              • 05-12-09
              • 21562

              #41
              Originally posted by Justin7
              I've seen the evidence. He was innocent.
              Comment
              • ronjon619
                SBR MVP
                • 09-06-09
                • 3675

                #42
                "if the glove don't fit, you must acquit."
                Comment
                • hoopster42
                  Restricted User
                  • 02-12-08
                  • 6099

                  #43
                  Originally posted by Justin7
                  I've seen the evidence. He was innocent.
                  you are either the dumbest human on earth or you did not see all of the evidence. which is it?
                  Comment
                  • Grind House
                    SBR MVP
                    • 01-01-10
                    • 1405

                    #44
                    Don't know what the fuk ya'll talking about, the man is innocent of murder. The police should go look for the real killers.
                    Comment
                    • Justin7
                      SBR Hall of Famer
                      • 07-31-06
                      • 8577

                      #45
                      Originally posted by hoopster42
                      you are either the dumbest human on earth or you did not see all of the evidence. which is it?
                      Perhaps both?

                      Calling him innocent is a statement of fact and law, not an opinion. My opinion is he is a murderer, and got away with it.
                      Comment
                      • hoopster42
                        Restricted User
                        • 02-12-08
                        • 6099

                        #46
                        Originally posted by Justin7
                        Perhaps both?

                        Calling him innocent is a statement of fact and law, not an opinion. My opinion is he is a murderer, and got away with it.
                        the correct term is "not guilty". "innocent" means cleared of all charges through proof of evidence that does not implicate him. OJ was found "not guilty", not "innocent". And if you think the evidence proves him "innocent", then you need to get yourself an education, specifically in biology where you can learn how dna is a genetic fingerprint
                        Comment
                        • Brock Landers
                          SBR Aristocracy
                          • 06-30-08
                          • 45359

                          #47
                          Originally posted by hoopster42
                          the correct term is "not guilty". "innocent" means cleared of all charges through proof of evidence that does not implicate him. OJ was found "not guilty", not "innocent". And if you think the evidence proves him "innocent", then you need to get yourself an education, specifically in biology where you can learn how dna is a genetic fingerprint
                          too bad double jeopardy excludes him from being tried properly..
                          Comment
                          • hoopster42
                            Restricted User
                            • 02-12-08
                            • 6099

                            #48
                            Originally posted by Brock Landers
                            too bad double jeopardy excludes him from being tried properly..
                            the burglary and kidnapping sentence in vegas was basically his punishment for murder. 33 yrs in prison and the earliest he gets out is after 9 year, yeah man, believe me, that was basically a murder sentence and payback time and they threw all the books at him not just one
                            Comment
                            • brooks85
                              SBR Aristocracy
                              • 01-05-09
                              • 44709

                              #49
                              sublime album beginning to end, ****ing amazing
                              Comment
                              • brooks85
                                SBR Aristocracy
                                • 01-05-09
                                • 44709

                                #50
                                i would of love for those rats to try and jack my ride. They would be breakdancing under my car.
                                Comment
                                • BadNina
                                  SBR Posting Legend
                                  • 11-27-07
                                  • 10491

                                  #51
                                  the way the evidence was presented in that case, I would have had to vote not guilty as well. The DA's office did a horrible job. They were outmanuevered by Cochran and Shapiro.
                                  Comment
                                  Search
                                  Collapse
                                  SBR Contests
                                  Collapse
                                  Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                                  Collapse
                                  Working...